The Sanctity of a Private Message

bg23

motherfuckin'sparklepony
Joined
Jan 20, 2003
Posts
48,190
So you're engaging in a mudslinging contest with someone. Insults are traded, etc, etc...and the other party says, "I'm not going to reply to you anymore."

Minutes later, you find a PM in your box, making a snarky little comment.

This happens to me quite a bit. Sometimes just an apology or whatever, but sometimes a snarky continuation of what was started in the thread.

I think this practice is entirely bullshit. I don't carry on flamewars into PM. If you have something to say to me, say it in public. If you're looking to explain or apologise and you want to be discreet, sure, PM. But if it's to make some snide little comment that you're too afraid of ruining your spotless lit rep for to post in public -- well, either you keep it in public or I'll bring it there myself.

I'm perfectly well aware of the rules regarding posting Private Messages on the board. I've no issues with that -- I have never, and will never, post a private message on the board.

But does this mean I won't allude to your Private Messaging me? Hell no. It's a fact -- that's what you did, that's what I'll say. I'm under no obligation to keep secret the fact that you messaged me.

Does this mean that, should I want to, I'm going to paraphrase the contents of your message as I see fit and post it here? Hell yeah. Again, if we're not on civil terms, I owe you nothing in terms of secrecy or discretion. If you PM me with "You're a stupid bitch", I will say, "Hotgrrl898043278 just PMed me and called me an unintelligent female dog".

I believe in keeping trust and living up to someone's faith in you. But you twits who I'm engaged in a flame with should know better than to expect me to think I owe you anything.

Thoughts?
 
Retrieval said:
Is that a training bra your wearing bg?

is that a strap on sticking out of your ass?

oh my!

you do like to take "being a pussy" to a whole new level, don't you?
 
ForeverNAlways said:
Sounds completely fair.

Esp. this part:



PMs should clarify someone's position for the purpose of engaging in a personal conversaton ~ not exasperate the situation.

exacerbate ;)
 
ForeverNAlways said:
*affronted look*

You could have just pm'd me to point out my misspelling! You didn't have to out me in front of the whole board!
But then what would be the point? Then the entire board couldn't see how smart he is.
 
ForeverNAlways said:
*affronted look*

You could have just pm'd me to point out my misspelling! You didn't have to out me in front of the whole board!


I just PMed to apologize.

Oh no, wait, that's wrong...I commited the offense in public so I need to apologize in public. I'm so confused...I gotta go reread BG's first post, hang on.
 
ForeverNAlways said:
Sounds completely fair.

Esp. this part:



PMs should clarify someone's position for the purpose of engaging in a personal conversaton ~ not exasperate the situation.

exactly.

a PM which is sent in "good faith", with reasonable expectations of trust and discretion, i will treat accordingly.

if someone sends me a PM to say, "hey, this is why i said this, etc etc" it's sent in good faith with the reasonable expectation that i will keep it private.

but we're in a flame war, you send me a snippy comment, you take the flame into PM -- you have no right whatsoever to expect privacy, or to expect me to keep what you said a secret.
 
glamorilla said:
the average pm here has like six readers.

For once I totally agree with you.

Also, for a person calling herself the Co-Nicest GB Poster, it's a wonder that you're into mudslinging and flaming with others in private. Wait, no it's not.
 
bg23 said:
So you're engaging in a mudslinging contest with someone. Insults are traded, etc, etc...and the other party says, "I'm not going to reply to you anymore."

Minutes later, you find a PM in your box, making a snarky little comment.

This happens to me quite a bit. Sometimes just an apology or whatever, but sometimes a snarky continuation of what was started in the thread.

I think this practice is entirely bullshit. I don't carry on flamewars into PM. If you have something to say to me, say it in public. If you're looking to explain or apologise and you want to be discreet, sure, PM. But if it's to make some snide little comment that you're too afraid of ruining your spotless lit rep for to post in public -- well, either you keep it in public or I'll bring it there myself.

I'm perfectly well aware of the rules regarding posting Private Messages on the board. I've no issues with that -- I have never, and will never, post a private message on the board.

But does this mean I won't allude to your Private Messaging me? Hell no. It's a fact -- that's what you did, that's what I'll say. I'm under no obligation to keep secret the fact that you messaged me.

Does this mean that, should I want to, I'm going to paraphrase the contents of your message as I see fit and post it here? Hell yeah. Again, if we're not on civil terms, I owe you nothing in terms of secrecy or discretion. If you PM me with "You're a stupid bitch", I will say, "Hotgrrl898043278 just PMed me and called me an unintelligent female dog".

I believe in keeping trust and living up to someone's faith in you. But you twits who I'm engaged in a flame with should know better than to expect me to think I owe you anything.

Thoughts?

I agree completely. I have never understood this taboo against discussing conversations from pm's that are a result of feuds/flames/troll fests on the open board.

It's just another control thing as far as I'm concerned. I've had people tell me I was WRONG for posting threats that came in a pm. HAHA!!! Like I was bound by some higher moralistic law to not repeat pm words while the messenger was telling me they were gonna send a "visitor" my way because I pissed them off in public.

Humans are strange.
 
Back
Top