gotsnowgotslush
skates like Eck
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2007
- Posts
- 25,720
Hillary Clinton wears pantsuits.
Her pantsuits do not have pockets.
She chooses not to wear a copy of a man's suit, in public.
Why ?
Some say inequality.
Some say the accusation of transvestitism.
As it stands today, there are trolls that accuse H.Clinton of being male, or of being a hermaphrodite.
Is it because H.Clinton wears the pants?
It was a big deal, on Downton Abbey, for the youngest daughter to wear "high fashion pantaloons," at a family gathering.
Women still used a side saddle in a hunt, because they were still required to wear dresses in a dangerous situation.
In 1938, a woman was sent to jail for wearing pants.
A judge was allowed to control what a woman wore in a court of law.
Guerin's contempt citation was overturned by the Appellate Division during a habeas corpus hearing. Hulick was free to wear slacks to court.
http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-california-retrospective-20141023-story.html
The royals did not want anyone of the common population to usurp their power, won by claim of bloodline.
Men did not want women to usurp their power, won by claim of birth.
Hillary Clinton uses a delicate balance, while walking on a tight rope.
Enough education, experience, and practice to make her a formidable challenger.
But, she must present a denial, that she is masquerading.
No pockets.
She has the legal right to earn a place in the political world.
But she must adhere to society's rules and norms, that apply to her position.
H.Clinton stuck her tongue out, and jeered at the limitations and expectations placed on her. When she lost the election, her next media photo was of her with minimal make up and unstructured hair.
She could have been any normal grandmother, driving her grandchildren to an activity.
She was not wearing the hair helmet of M.Thatcher UK, or A. Merkel.
H.Clinton mocked DT The Illegitimate Pretender, because he was wearing an elaborate woman's coiffure, with a salon's worth of hair product, to cover his balding pate. DT was wearing a heavy mask of make up. High definition television demands a make up as thick and pasty as grease make up for the theatre.
Hilary Clinton has the skin and hair that announce her true, youthful grandmother presence. She does not need heavy camouflage.
Unlike DT, that has a disguise that fails him.
DT may complain about unflattering fillm footage.
The camera does not lie, when it is not forced to deceive.
http://www.racked.com/2016/12/5/13778914/pantsuits-history
Her pantsuits do not have pockets.
She chooses not to wear a copy of a man's suit, in public.
Why ?
Some say inequality.
Some say the accusation of transvestitism.
As it stands today, there are trolls that accuse H.Clinton of being male, or of being a hermaphrodite.
Is it because H.Clinton wears the pants?
It was a big deal, on Downton Abbey, for the youngest daughter to wear "high fashion pantaloons," at a family gathering.
Women still used a side saddle in a hunt, because they were still required to wear dresses in a dangerous situation.
In 1938, a woman was sent to jail for wearing pants.
A judge was allowed to control what a woman wore in a court of law.
Guerin's contempt citation was overturned by the Appellate Division during a habeas corpus hearing. Hulick was free to wear slacks to court.
http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-california-retrospective-20141023-story.html
The royals did not want anyone of the common population to usurp their power, won by claim of bloodline.
Men did not want women to usurp their power, won by claim of birth.
Hillary Clinton uses a delicate balance, while walking on a tight rope.
Enough education, experience, and practice to make her a formidable challenger.
But, she must present a denial, that she is masquerading.
No pockets.
She has the legal right to earn a place in the political world.
But she must adhere to society's rules and norms, that apply to her position.
H.Clinton stuck her tongue out, and jeered at the limitations and expectations placed on her. When she lost the election, her next media photo was of her with minimal make up and unstructured hair.
She could have been any normal grandmother, driving her grandchildren to an activity.
She was not wearing the hair helmet of M.Thatcher UK, or A. Merkel.
H.Clinton mocked DT The Illegitimate Pretender, because he was wearing an elaborate woman's coiffure, with a salon's worth of hair product, to cover his balding pate. DT was wearing a heavy mask of make up. High definition television demands a make up as thick and pasty as grease make up for the theatre.
Hilary Clinton has the skin and hair that announce her true, youthful grandmother presence. She does not need heavy camouflage.
Unlike DT, that has a disguise that fails him.
DT may complain about unflattering fillm footage.
The camera does not lie, when it is not forced to deceive.
http://www.racked.com/2016/12/5/13778914/pantsuits-history
Last edited:
