The perfect porn for young women

I can't comment on the TV show, but I did read the first one or two of the books. They were pretty well written with an interesting plot, just not my thing so I didn't finish them, but for the genre they were OK from my POV.

Mike
 
I think I have stumbled upon the perfect porn for young women.
It is the new SyFy paranormal soap opera, "Bitten".

I don't want to turn this into an ad for the show. Let me just summarize the details I know so far:
- There is only one female werwolf. Whenever she gets aroused, she wants to run naked through the city streets and turns into a wolf.
- She is part of a pack (all other male). They also run naked through woods frequently.
- She resists the draw of the Alpha Male, but we all know she is destined to be with him.
- Wear wolves apparently make awesome lovers (like vampires in True Blood), and they are highly coveted. So far, there has been a MFM scene between a human girl and wolves that I'm amazed was shown on basic cable (lots of breasts, butts, and simulated kinky sex including implied double penetration/sandwich - soft core to be sure but boundary pushing)
- The Lead actress has a body double for sex scenes but not other scenes. The entire cast is routinely naked on set particularly for the transformations. Again - one woman with a pack of hunky men.
- The lead actress helped cast the men by evaluating her "chemistry" with them. Apparently, the casting sessions were worth attending even if you didn't get the part.


I say porn for young women because - well - it just is ;)

What about "Lost Girl" with Anna Silk?
 
"Porn" by definition is graphic and focussed on the sexual acts that are central to the plot, if there is one.

A plot that refers to sexuality and sexual activities without actually portraying them-- you can call it erotica if you must, but let's not pretend that near-sex is porn. Naked skin isn't enough.

I have reasons for this nit-picking.

It's received wisdom that women generally dislike graphic sexual portrayals, and therefore, received wisdom that it's not worth trying to cater to women's taste-- women have no taste. So the mainstream companies continue on with the nonsensical chicka-bow-bow films featuring invisible men and Max Factored women making porn faces-- the easy stuff that they already know.

sorry... rant over. :eek:
 
"Porn" by definition is graphic and focussed on the sexual acts that are central to the plot, if there is one.

A plot that refers to sexuality and sexual activities without actually portraying them-- you can call it erotica if you must, but let's not pretend that near-sex is porn. Naked skin isn't enough.

I have reasons for this nit-picking.

It's received wisdom that women generally dislike graphic sexual portrayals, and therefore, received wisdom that it's not worth trying to cater to women's taste-- women have no taste. So the mainstream companies continue on with the nonsensical chicka-bow-bow films featuring invisible men and Max Factored women making porn faces-- the easy stuff that they already know.

sorry... rant over. :eek:

Oh don't apologise, Stella.
Just occasionally, I manage to actually learn something, usually reading your comments.
I presume that the tide is slowly turning, though ?
:rose:
 
Back
Top