The Middle East takeover

70/30

~
Joined
Jul 4, 2002
Posts
4,001
Don't forget the sunscreen and the gas can, Iraq's just the beginning.

The LaRouchie defector who's advising the defense establishment on Saudi Arabia.
By Jack Shafer
Posted Wednesday, August 7, 2002, at 4:49 PM PT
http://slate.msn.com/?id=2069119

Diplomatic china rattled in Washington and cracked in Riyadh yesterday when the Washington Post published a story about a briefing given to a Pentagon advisory group last month. The briefing declared Saudi Arabia an enemy of the United States and advocated that the United States invade the country, seize its oil fields, and confiscate its financial assets unless the Saudis stop supporting the anti-Western terror network...

According to Newsday, Defense Policy Board Chairman Richard N. Perle, a former Pentagon official and full-time invade-Iraq hawk, invited Laurent Murawiec to brief the group.

below is skeleton of powerpoint presented.

Taking Saudi Out of Arabia

Laurent Murawiec
RAND
Defense Policy Board
July 10, 2002


1

Taking Saudi out of Arabia:
Contents

The Arab Crisis

"Saudi" Arabia

Strategies

2

The Arab Crisis

3

The systemic crisis of the Arab
World

The Arab world has been in a systemic crisis for the last 200 years
It missed out on the industrial revolution, it is missing out on the digital revolution
Lack of inner resources to cope with modern world

4

Shattered Arab self-esteem

Shattered self-esteem
Could God be wrong?
Turn the rage against those who contradict God: the West, object of hatred
A whole generation of violently anti-Western, anti-American, anti-modern shock-troops

5

What has the Arab world
produced?

Since independence, wars have been the principal output of the Arab world
Demographic and economic problems made intractable by failure to establish stable polities aiming at prosperity
All Arab states are either failing states or threatened to fail

6

The Crisis of the Arab world
reaches a climax

The tension between the Arab world and the modern world has reached a climax

The Arab world's home-made problems overwhelm its ability to cope

The crisis is consequently being exported to the rest of the world

7

How does change occur in the
Arab world?

There is no agora, no public space for debating ideas, interests, policies
The tribal group in power blocks all avenues of change, represses all advocates of change
Plot, riot, murder, coup are the only available means to bring about political change

8

The continuation of politics by other
means?

In the Arab world, violence is not a continuation of politics by other means -- violence is politics, politics is violence
This culture of violence is the prime enabler of terrorism
Terror as an accepted, legitimate means of carrying out politics, has been incubated for 30 years ...

9

The crisis cannot be contained to the
Arab world alone

The crisis has irreversibly spilled out of the region
9/11 was a symptom of the "overflow"
The paroxysm is liable to last for several decades
U.S. response will decisively influence the duration and outcome

10

"Saudi" Arabia

11

The old partnership

Once upon a time, there was a partnership between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia

Partnerships, like alliances, are embodied in practices, ideas, policies, institutions, people -- which persist after the alliance has died

12

"Saudi" Arabia

An instable group: Since 1745, 58% of all rulers of the House of Saud have met a violent demise
Wahhabism loathes modernity, capitalism, human rights, religious freedom, democracy, republics, an open society -- and practices the very opposite
As long as enmity had no or little consequences outside the kingdom, the bargain between the House of Saud and the U.S. held

13

Means, motive, opportunity

1973: Saudi Arabia unleashes the Oil Shock, absorbs immense flows of resources -- means
1978: Khomeiny challenges the Saudis' Islamic credentials, provoking a radicalization and world-wide spread of Wahhabism in response -- motive
1979-1989: the anti-Soviet Jihad gives life and strength to the Wahhabi putsch within Sunni Islam -- opportunity. The Taliban are the result

14

The impact on Saudi policy

Wahhabism moves from Islam's lunatic fringe to center-stage -- its mission now extends world-wide
Saudis launch a putsch within Sunni Islam
Shift from pragmatic oil policy to promotion of radical Islam
Establish Saudi as "the indispensable State" -- treasurers of radical, fundamentalist, terrorist groups

15

Saudis see themselves

God placed the oil in the kingdom as a sign of divine approval
Spread Wahhabism everywhere, but keep the power of the al-Saud undiminished
Survive by creating a Wahhabi-friendly environment -- fundamentalist regimes -- throughout the Moslem world and beyond

16

The House of Saud today

Saudi Arabia is central to the self-destruction of the Arab world and the chief vector of the Arab crisis and its outwardly-directed aggression
The Saudis are active at every level of the terror chain, from planners to financiers, from cadre to foot-soldier, from ideologist to cheerleader
Saudi Arabia supports our enemies and attacks our allies
A daily outpouring of virulent hatred against the U.S. from Saudi media, "educational" institutions, clerics, officials -- Saudis tell us one thing in private, do the contrary in reality

17

Strategies

18

What is to be done?

During and after World War I, Britain's India Office backed the House of Saud; the Foreign Office backed the Hashemites. The India Office won
But the entire post-1*** Middle East settlement designed by the British to replace the Ottoman Empire is fraying
The role assigned to the House of Saud in that arrangement has become obsolete -- and nefarious

19

"Saudi Arabia" is not a God-
given entity

The House of Saud was given dominion over Arabia in 1922 by the British
It wrested the Guardianship of the Holy Places -- Mecca and Medina -- from the Hashemite dynasty
There is an "Arabia," but it needs not be "Saudi"

20

An ultimatum to the House of
Saud

Stop any funding and support for any fundamentalist madrasa, mosque, ulama, predicator anywhere in the world
Stop all anti-U.S., anti-Israeli, anti-Western predication, writings, etc., within Arabia
Dismantle, ban all the kingdom's "Islamic charities," confiscate their assets
Prosecute or isolate those involved in the terror chain, including in the Saudi intelligence services

21

Or else ...

What the House of Saud holds dear can be targeted:
—Oil: the old fields are defended by U.S. forces, and located in a mostly Shiite area
—Money: the Kingdom is in dire financial straits, its valuable assets invested in dollars, largely in the U.S.
—The Holy Places: let it be known that alternatives are being canvassed


22

Other Arabs?

The Saudis are hated throughout the Arab world: lazy, overbearing, dishonest, corrupt
If truly moderate regimes arise, the Wahhabi-Saudi nexus is pushed back into its extremist corner
The Hashemites have greater legitimacy as Guardians of Mecca and Medina

23

Grand strategy for the Middle
East

• Iraq is the tactical pivot

• Saudi Arabia the strategic pivot

• Egypt the prize
 
Perles of hawkdom: 'terrorist' finally defined

PERLE: I don't believe that a company would gain from a war. On the contrary, I believe that the successful removal of Saddam Hussein, and I've said this over and over again, will diminish the threat of terrorism. And what he's talking about is investments in homeland defense, which I think are vital and are necessary. Look, Sy Hersh is the closest thing American journalism has to a terrorist, frankly.

BLITZER: Well, on the basis of -- why do you say that? A terrorist?

PERLE: Because he's wildly irresponsible. If you read the article, it's first of all, impossible to find any consistent theme in it. But the suggestion that my views are somehow related for the potential for investments in homeland defense is complete nonsense.

BLITZER: But I don't understand. Why do you accuse him of being a terrorist?

PERLE: Because he sets out to do damage and he will do it by whatever innuendo, whatever distortion he can -- look, he hasn't written a serious piece since "My Lai" [an exposé of American slaughter of women and children in Vietnam].

**********************
"He ignites bombs and I don't think he cares whether the victims are innocent civilians," the former assistant defense secretary declares.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A23380-2003Mar13?language=printer
 
Well, I've said before that many of the "justifications" for invading Iraq were more applicable to Saudi Arabia & Yemen. Now I know why.

Perle is a frightening fellow.
 
For the hardliners: It is about oil, it is about terrorism, it is about quelling fundamental Islam. Making Saudi Arabia vulnerable is the goal--

"The Saudis are active at every level of the terror chain, from planners to financiers, from cadre to foot-soldier, from ideologist to cheerleader. Saudi Arabia supports our enemies and attacks our allies."

It is a mystery what the Egypt is the Prize proclamation refers to--my guess, after the House of Saud falls, then the Islamic regimes will drop like the dominos. I'm also not shocked Perle is a board member of the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs (JINSA).

-------------------------

The softballers might have something to protest about, even if all of them don't know the exact reasons why. Comparisons to Vietnam aren't accurate--this could spread everywhich way, turning Perle's 'enemy of western civilisation' regime into an actual east vs west scenario.

The playing field will be more level, our economic system needs stability to function. Our military needs 100s of billions to function. We also have no staunch military allies besides Israel. Plus there are 1.25billion muslims in the world, most of them are under 40.

Many of them will feel they have nothing to lose and a bunch of virgins in heaven to gain.
 
Thankfully Perle is being shown the door:

WASHINGTON March 28 —
Former Pentagon official Richard Perle resigned Thursday as chairman of a group that advises Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on policy issues, saying he did not want a controversy over his business dealings to distract from Rumsfeld's management of the war in Iraq.

In a brief statement, Rumsfeld thanked Perle for his service and said he was grateful that the former Reagan administration official had agreed to remain a board member. Rumsfeld made no reference to a reason for Perle giving up the chairmanship.

Perle said he was stepping aside voluntarily.

"I have seen controversies like that before and I know that this one will inevitably distract from the urgent challenge in which you are now engaged," Perle wrote in a resignation letter.

In the letter, made public by the Pentagon and dated March 26, Perle assured Rumsfeld that he had abided by rules applying to members of the Defense Policy Board. He has been chairman of the board since July 2001. The position is unpaid but is subject to government ethics rules that prohibit using public office for private gain.

The controversy centers on Perle's deal with bankrupt Global Crossing Ltd. to win government approval of its purchase by a joint venture of two Asian firms. Perle would receive $725,000 for his work, including $600,000 if the government approves the deal, according to lawyers and others involved in the bankruptcy case.

The deal is under review by a government group that includes representatives from the Defense Department.

Perle denied any wrongdoing.

"The guiding principle here is that you do not give advice in the Defense Policy Board on any particular matter in which you have an interest," Perle said in a recent interview. "And I don't do that. I haven't done that."

The Defense Policy Board is a bipartisan group that advises the secretary of defense on a wide range of policy issues. Its 30 members are a mix of former military and government officials. They include former CIA Director James Woolsey, former Vice President Dan Quayle, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and former Air Force Chief of Staff Ronald Fogleman.

Perle wrote in his resignation letter that he could not "quickly or easily quell criticism" in the Global Crossing controversy, adding that it was "based on errors of fact."

Nonetheless, he wrote, "I would not wish to cause even a moment's distraction from" the war effort.

Perle said he was advising Global Crossing that he would not accept any compensation from the pending sale and that any fee for his past services would be donated to the families of American forces killed or injured in Iraq.

In his written statement, Rumsfeld thanked Perle for his service.

"He has been an excellent chairman and has led the Defense Policy Board during an important time in our history," Rumsfeld said. "I should add that I have known Richard Perle for many years and know him to be a man of integrity and honor."

Perle was an assistant secretary of defense during the Reagan administration.

He became involved in another controversy stemming from an article in The New Yorker that said he had lunch in January with Saudi-born businessman Adnan Khashoggi and a Saudi industrialist.

The industrialist, Harb Saleh Zuhair, was interested in investing in a venture capital firm, Trireme Partners, of which Perle is a managing partner. Nothing ever came of the lunch in Marseilles; no investment was made. But the New Yorker story, written by Seymour M. Hersh, suggested that Perle, a longtime critic of the Saudi regime, was inappropriately mixing business and politics.

Perle called the report preposterous and "monstrous."

Perle, 61, was so strongly opposed to nuclear arms control agreements with the former Soviet Union during his days in the Reagan administration that he became known as "the Prince of Darkness."
 
Back
Top