The Middle Class in America Is Radically Shrinking.

fgarvb1

We are in for it now.
Joined
Dec 10, 2000
Posts
12,729
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/the-u.s.-middle-class-is-being-wiped-out-here%27s-the-stats-to-prove-it-520657.html?tickers=^DJI,^GSPC,SPY,MCD,WMT,XRT,DIA


The Middle Class in America Is Radically Shrinking. Here Are the Stats to Prove it
Posted Jul 15, 2010 02:25pm EDT by Michael Snyder in Recession
Related: ^DJI, ^GSPC, SPY, MCD, WMT, XRT, DIA


From The Business Insider

Editor's note: Michael Snyder is editor of theeconomiccollapseblog.com

The 22 statistics detailed here prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence in America.

The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer at a staggering rate. Once upon a time, the United States had the largest and most prosperous middle class in the history of the world, but now that is changing at a blinding pace.

So why are we witnessing such fundamental changes? Well, the globalism and "free trade" that our politicians and business leaders insisted would be so good for us have had some rather nasty side effects. It turns out that they didn't tell us that the "global economy" would mean that middle class American workers would eventually have to directly compete for jobs with people on the other side of the world where there is no minimum wage and very few regulations. The big global corporations have greatly benefited by exploiting third world labor pools over the last several decades, but middle class American workers have increasingly found things to be very tough.

Here are the statistics to prove it:

• 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people.
• 61 percent of Americans "always or usually" live paycheck to paycheck, which was up from 49 percent in 2008 and 43 percent in 2007.
• 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans.
• 36 percent of Americans say that they don't contribute anything to retirement savings.
• A staggering 43 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved up for retirement.
• 24 percent of American workers say that they have postponed their planned retirement age in the past year.
• Over 1.4 million Americans filed for personal bankruptcy in 2009, which represented a 32 percent increase over 2008.
• Only the top 5 percent of U.S. households have earned enough additional income to match the rise in housing costs since 1975.
• For the first time in U.S. history, banks own a greater share of residential housing net worth in the United States than all individual Americans put together.
• In 1950, the ratio of the average executive's paycheck to the average worker's paycheck was about 30 to 1. Since the year 2000, that ratio has exploded to between 300 to 500 to one.
• As of 2007, the bottom 80 percent of American households held about 7% of the liquid financial assets.
• The bottom 50 percent of income earners in the United States now collectively own less than 1 percent of the nation’s wealth.
• Average Wall Street bonuses for 2009 were up 17 percent when compared with 2008.
• In the United States, the average federal worker now earns 60% MORE than the average worker in the private sector.
• The top 1 percent of U.S. households own nearly twice as much of America's corporate wealth as they did just 15 years ago.
• In America today, the average time needed to find a job has risen to a record 35.2 weeks.
• More than 40 percent of Americans who actually are employed are now working in service jobs, which are often very low paying.
• or the first time in U.S. history, more than 40 million Americans are on food stamps, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture projects that number will go up to 43 million Americans in 2011.
• This is what American workers now must compete against: in China a garment worker makes approximately 86 cents an hour and in Cambodia a garment worker makes approximately 22 cents an hour.
• Approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States are living below the poverty line in 2010 - the highest rate in 20 years.
• Despite the financial crisis, the number of millionaires in the United States rose a whopping 16 percent to 7.8 million in 2009.
• The top 10 percent of Americans now earn around 50 percent of our national income.

Giant Sucking Sound

The reality is that no matter how smart, how strong, how educated or how hard working American workers are, they just cannot compete with people who are desperate to put in 10 to 12 hour days at less than a dollar an hour on the other side of the world. After all, what corporation in their right mind is going to pay an American worker 10 times more (plus benefits) to do the same job? The world is fundamentally changing. Wealth and power are rapidly becoming concentrated at the top and the big global corporations are making massive amounts of money. Meanwhile, the American middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence as U.S. workers are slowly being merged into the new "global" labor pool.

What do most Americans have to offer in the marketplace other than their labor? Not much. The truth is that most Americans are absolutely dependent on someone else giving them a job. But today, U.S. workers are "less attractive" than ever. Compared to the rest of the world, American workers are extremely expensive, and the government keeps passing more rules and regulations seemingly on a monthly basis that makes it even more difficult to conduct business in the United States.

So corporations are moving operations out of the U.S. at breathtaking speed. Since the U.S. government does not penalize them for doing so, there really is no incentive for them to stay.

What has developed is a situation where the people at the top are doing quite well, while most Americans are finding it increasingly difficult to make it. There are now about six unemployed Americans for every new job opening in the United States, and the number of "chronically unemployed" is absolutely soaring. There simply are not nearly enough jobs for everyone.

Many of those who are able to get jobs are finding that they are making less money than they used to. In fact, an increasingly large percentage of Americans are working at low wage retail and service jobs.

But you can't raise a family on what you make flipping burgers at McDonald's or on what you bring in from greeting customers down at the local Wal-Mart.

The truth is that the middle class in America is dying -- and once it is gone it will be incredibly difficult to rebuild.
 
I'm confused. Wasn't free trade and the destruction of the unions, along with our manufacturing base, a good thing?
 
• 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people.

Always good to keep this fact in mind when people start blithering on about the ownership society, and how your pissant little IRA puts you in the same corner as Warren, George and Bill.
 
Not to be fussy about it, but many of these statistics are just plain wrong, and give the impression that things are changing dramatically when they're not changing much at all.

Here's an example that shows that the stock ownership figure for the top 1% really applies to the top 10%, and has been essentially unchanged for the last twenty+ years.

Table 9. The Percent of Total Assets Held by Wealth Class, 2007
...............**** ..Next Bottom ....Share of Top 10 %
Asset Type 1.0% 9.0% 90.0% All 1983 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007
A. Investment Assets
Stocks and mutual funds 49.3 40.1 10.6 100.0 90.4 86.0 86.3 88.4 85.1 84.5 85.4 89.4
Financial securities 60.6 37.9 1.5 100.0 82.9 87.1 91.3 89.8 84.1 88.7 87.9 98.5
Trusts 38.9 40.5 20.6 100.0 95.4 87.9 87.9 88.5 90.8 86.7 81.5 79.4
Business equity 62.4 30.9 6.7 100.0 89.9 89.8 91.0 91.7 91.7 89.6 90.3 93.3
Non-home real estate 28.3 48.6 23.1 100.0 76.3 79.6 83.0 78.7 74.9 78.5 79.4 76.9
Total for group 49.7 38.1 12.2 100.0 85.6 85.7 87.6 87.5 86.2 85.5 85.6 87.8
Stocks, directly or 38.3 42.9 18.8 100.0 89.7 80.8 78.7 81.9 78.7 76.9 78.8 81.2
indirectly owned

If you really care about this stuff, this is a good read:

http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_589.pdf
 
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/the-u.s.-middle-class-is-being-wiped-out-here%27s-the-stats-to-prove-it-520657.html?tickers=^DJI,^GSPC,SPY,MCD,WMT,XRT,DIA


The Middle Class in America Is Radically Shrinking. Here Are the Stats to Prove it
Posted Jul 15, 2010 02:25pm EDT by Michael Snyder in Recession
Related: ^DJI, ^GSPC, SPY, MCD, WMT, XRT, DIA


From The Business Insider

Editor's note: Michael Snyder is editor of theeconomiccollapseblog.com

The 22 statistics detailed here prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence in America.

The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer at a staggering rate. Once upon a time, the United States had the largest and most prosperous middle class in the history of the world, but now that is changing at a blinding pace.

So why are we witnessing such fundamental changes? Well, the globalism and "free trade" that our politicians and business leaders insisted would be so good for us have had some rather nasty side effects. It turns out that they didn't tell us that the "global economy" would mean that middle class American workers would eventually have to directly compete for jobs with people on the other side of the world where there is no minimum wage and very few regulations. The big global corporations have greatly benefited by exploiting third world labor pools over the last several decades, but middle class American workers have increasingly found things to be very tough.

Here are the statistics to prove it:

• 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people.
• 61 percent of Americans "always or usually" live paycheck to paycheck, which was up from 49 percent in 2008 and 43 percent in 2007.
• 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans.
• 36 percent of Americans say that they don't contribute anything to retirement savings.
• A staggering 43 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved up for retirement.
• 24 percent of American workers say that they have postponed their planned retirement age in the past year.
• Over 1.4 million Americans filed for personal bankruptcy in 2009, which represented a 32 percent increase over 2008.
• Only the top 5 percent of U.S. households have earned enough additional income to match the rise in housing costs since 1975.
• For the first time in U.S. history, banks own a greater share of residential housing net worth in the United States than all individual Americans put together.
• In 1950, the ratio of the average executive's paycheck to the average worker's paycheck was about 30 to 1. Since the year 2000, that ratio has exploded to between 300 to 500 to one.
• As of 2007, the bottom 80 percent of American households held about 7% of the liquid financial assets.
• The bottom 50 percent of income earners in the United States now collectively own less than 1 percent of the nation’s wealth.
• Average Wall Street bonuses for 2009 were up 17 percent when compared with 2008.
• In the United States, the average federal worker now earns 60% MORE than the average worker in the private sector.
• The top 1 percent of U.S. households own nearly twice as much of America's corporate wealth as they did just 15 years ago.
• In America today, the average time needed to find a job has risen to a record 35.2 weeks.
• More than 40 percent of Americans who actually are employed are now working in service jobs, which are often very low paying.
• or the first time in U.S. history, more than 40 million Americans are on food stamps, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture projects that number will go up to 43 million Americans in 2011.
• This is what American workers now must compete against: in China a garment worker makes approximately 86 cents an hour and in Cambodia a garment worker makes approximately 22 cents an hour.
• Approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States are living below the poverty line in 2010 - the highest rate in 20 years.
• Despite the financial crisis, the number of millionaires in the United States rose a whopping 16 percent to 7.8 million in 2009.
• The top 10 percent of Americans now earn around 50 percent of our national income.

Giant Sucking Sound

The reality is that no matter how smart, how strong, how educated or how hard working American workers are, they just cannot compete with people who are desperate to put in 10 to 12 hour days at less than a dollar an hour on the other side of the world. After all, what corporation in their right mind is going to pay an American worker 10 times more (plus benefits) to do the same job? The world is fundamentally changing. Wealth and power are rapidly becoming concentrated at the top and the big global corporations are making massive amounts of money. Meanwhile, the American middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence as U.S. workers are slowly being merged into the new "global" labor pool.

What do most Americans have to offer in the marketplace other than their labor? Not much. The truth is that most Americans are absolutely dependent on someone else giving them a job. But today, U.S. workers are "less attractive" than ever. Compared to the rest of the world, American workers are extremely expensive, and the government keeps passing more rules and regulations seemingly on a monthly basis that makes it even more difficult to conduct business in the United States.

So corporations are moving operations out of the U.S. at breathtaking speed. Since the U.S. government does not penalize them for doing so, there really is no incentive for them to stay.

What has developed is a situation where the people at the top are doing quite well, while most Americans are finding it increasingly difficult to make it. There are now about six unemployed Americans for every new job opening in the United States, and the number of "chronically unemployed" is absolutely soaring. There simply are not nearly enough jobs for everyone.

Many of those who are able to get jobs are finding that they are making less money than they used to. In fact, an increasingly large percentage of Americans are working at low wage retail and service jobs.

But you can't raise a family on what you make flipping burgers at McDonald's or on what you bring in from greeting customers down at the local Wal-Mart.

The truth is that the middle class in America is dying -- and once it is gone it will be incredibly difficult to rebuild.

The lower class is rising! There will only be Two classes, the lower and upper class.

The people must be totally reliant on Obama's socialism.
 
A quick spin through any erstwhile middle class neighborhood will show why they do not have a greater percentage of stock ownership. Boats, personal watercraft, electronic toys, plastic breasts, swimming pools, travel trailers, manicured lush lawns, lush vacations, home remodeling, and multiple vehicles to name a few.

All of these things will ultimately be worth less than the funds originally expended on them. The wealthy put the largest percentage of their funds into assets that will grow in value.

Richard Allen, the real estate investor, summed it up when he said that most people give up the opportunity to be wealthy so they can appear to be wealthy.
 
....and there's your answer about what happened to the middle class, fgarble! Too much spending! Not enough saving! Tighten your belt! Comb your hair!
 
Obama is destroying the middle class to make the masses totally reliant on the government. His government.
 
Not to be fussy about it, but many of these statistics are just plain wrong, and give the impression that things are changing dramatically when they're not changing much at all.

Here's an example that shows that the stock ownership figure for the top 1% really applies to the top 10%, and has been essentially unchanged for the last twenty+ years.

Table 9. The Percent of Total Assets Held by Wealth Class, 2007
...............**** ..Next Bottom ....Share of Top 10 %
Asset Type 1.0% 9.0% 90.0% All 1983 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007
A. Investment Assets
Stocks and mutual funds 49.3 40.1 10.6 100.0 90.4 86.0 86.3 88.4 85.1 84.5 85.4 89.4
Financial securities 60.6 37.9 1.5 100.0 82.9 87.1 91.3 89.8 84.1 88.7 87.9 98.5
Trusts 38.9 40.5 20.6 100.0 95.4 87.9 87.9 88.5 90.8 86.7 81.5 79.4
Business equity 62.4 30.9 6.7 100.0 89.9 89.8 91.0 91.7 91.7 89.6 90.3 93.3
Non-home real estate 28.3 48.6 23.1 100.0 76.3 79.6 83.0 78.7 74.9 78.5 79.4 76.9
Total for group 49.7 38.1 12.2 100.0 85.6 85.7 87.6 87.5 86.2 85.5 85.6 87.8
Stocks, directly or 38.3 42.9 18.8 100.0 89.7 80.8 78.7 81.9 78.7 76.9 78.8 81.2
indirectly owned

If you really care about this stuff, this is a good read:

http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_589.pdf

Now I know things are going bad. The old Firespin would've never let this piss-poor example serve as a graph/stat/chart/diagram. Look at that shit...there's no matrix, no color-coordination, no tabs and you can barely follow the rows/columns! :mad:

See, this is why America is going down the tubes, people get lazy and nobody wants to put in a good effort anymore! Don't make me have to subcontract foreign help to do your job, Fire!
 
....and there's your answer about what happened to the middle class, fgarble! Too much spending! Not enough saving! Tighten your belt! Comb your hair!

You just don't get it do you????

Those who don't are the prey of those who do...Comb your hair!
 
You just don't get it do you????

Those who don't are the prey of those who do...Comb your hair!

I don't know the stats about people who manage to save their way into the top bracket without having some kind of large income source, but I did see something about that on my Yahoo News page the other day.

The other option is to organize.
 
I don't know the stats about people who manage to save their way into the top bracket without having some kind of large income source, but I did see something about that on my Yahoo News page the other day.

The other option is to organize.

Warren Buffet would skew those stats.
 
Fgarble seems to have vanished. I was waiting for the explanation for why a Bush conservative is posting inflammatory, class-war style articles.
 
Fgarble seems to have vanished. I was waiting for the explanation for why a Bush conservative is posting inflammatory, class-war style articles.

Victoria Wood used to do a routine where she said the only way there'd ever be a revolution in England was if the government tried to ban car boot sales and caravanning.
 
We deserve it, we made it all on the backs of the rest of the world. As Barry, he knows.

Ishmael
 
hey frisco: rosco is simply a socialist - he doesn't value the individual, let alone acknowledge individual initiative and preference. Those individuals that forgo the items you list above, knowing they're not assets but simply depreciating things, are despised by socialists like rosco...because all socialists are genetically incapable of accepting the true axiom: you can't have your cake and eat it, too.

Eventually, all socialists run up against that brick wall of natural truth. But their political disease is so "progressed" :)D), they turn to force to make what never can be true, "true" nonetheless...in their "perspective".

All "class" is part of Marxist philosophy - "class" is necessary for the envious underpinnings of political warfare (as exquisitely portrayed by rosco the socialist above). That's the big ideological diff between capitalism and Marxism: capitalism champions the individual, Marxism "class". Marx's error, just like all modern wannabe communists (called socialists), is thinking individuals can somehow be placed in any "class" - when individuals are as diverse as God created them.


But, that still doesn't stop 'em: rosco the socialist believes he - nay, "we" - has a right to be concerned re: my individual economic "class"; he census' me, he categorizes me, he determines the difference between the wealth I earn (wages) and the wealth I make (investments), and then he legislates according to the "class" he puts me in. All the while telling me it's the "truth"...

Well, I know the truth and rosco and all his socialist loser comrades in these here United Social States of America ain't never getting another penny from me to support their wannabeism...

The moment I realize ways in which I support - in any way - Wahhabi terrorism, I totally withdraw that support; same thing with wannabe socialism. And more and more every day it seems other individuals in this once great country are making that same decision...

...while socialism is taking the country, just like a Ayn Rand novel, the individual goes it alone.
 
So Rosco, now that you've been analyzed by a ten minute old n00b with religious fixations, is your Lit career over?
 
Now I know things are going bad. The old Firespin would've never let this piss-poor example serve as a graph/stat/chart/diagram. Look at that shit...there's no matrix, no color-coordination, no tabs and you can barely follow the rows/columns! :mad:

See, this is why America is going down the tubes, people get lazy and nobody wants to put in a good effort anymore! Don't make me have to subcontract foreign help to do your job, Fire!

The things I do for you people.

My buddy Srinivas in Bangalore hooked me up with this:

http://www.mybudget360.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/stock-ownership.png
 
hey frisco: rosco is simply a socialist - he doesn't value the individual, let alone acknowledge individual initiative and preference. Those individuals that forgo the items you list above, knowing they're not assets but simply depreciating things, are despised by socialists like rosco...because all socialists are genetically incapable of accepting the true axiom: you can't have your cake and eat it, too.

Eventually, all socialists run up against that brick wall of natural truth. But their political disease is so "progressed" :)D), they turn to force to make what never can be true, "true" nonetheless...in their "perspective".

All "class" is part of Marxist philosophy - "class" is necessary for the envious underpinnings of political warfare (as exquisitely portrayed by rosco the socialist above). That's the big ideological diff between capitalism and Marxism: capitalism champions the individual, Marxism "class". Marx's error, just like all modern wannabe communists (called socialists), is thinking individuals can somehow be placed in any "class" - when individuals are as diverse as God created them.


But, that still doesn't stop 'em: rosco the socialist believes he - nay, "we" - has a right to be concerned re: my individual economic "class"; he census' me, he categorizes me, he determines the difference between the wealth I earn (wages) and the wealth I make (investments), and then he legislates according to the "class" he puts me in. All the while telling me it's the "truth"...

Well, I know the truth and rosco and all his socialist loser comrades in these here United Social States of America ain't never getting another penny from me to support their wannabeism...

The moment I realize ways in which I support - in any way - Wahhabi terrorism, I totally withdraw that support; same thing with wannabe socialism. And more and more every day it seems other individuals in this once great country are making that same decision...

...while socialism is taking the country, just like a Ayn Rand novel, the individual goes it alone.

eyer + Frisco = love connection?

Number of times "Socialism/Socialist" is meme-repeated in this dickless passive-aggro insult towards Rosco bearded up as a pseudo-intelligent spiel/butt-squeeze towards Frisco: 11

(bonus points for name-dropping Ayn Rand)
 
Sorry, boys...you really need to start ejaculating your socialist minds from the rigid confines you roost them in...

...I'm not Texan. :D


And SH: keep trying 'ol boy; surely someday there's a chance you'll figure something out.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top