The Menendez (demoncrap) indictment: ‘Girlfriend 2,’ the doctor and the senator

[NeverEndingMe]

clearly all political leaders that are democraps are criminals as another one of the obama kind goes off to prison

Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) leaves the podium after speaking to the media during a news conference in Newark, N.J., on April 1, 2015. (Photo: Eduardo Munoz/Reuters)

New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez personally intervened to arrange U.S. visas for a Dominican model, a Brazilian student and a Ukrainian actress — girlfriends of a wealthy Florida doctor who plied the senator with nearly $1 million in gifts and campaign contributions, according to a Justice Department indictment released Wednesday.

Menendez’s efforts to facilitate the romantic life of his patron, Dr. Salomon Melgen, a Florida ophthalmologist and businessman, are among the most tantalizing details in a 68-page indictment that alleges a brazen cash-for-favors scheme that went on for years.

When one of Melgen’s girlfriends, the Dominican model, and her sister were both denied tourist visas by the U.S. embassy in that country — after a consular official noted, among other factors, their young age (18 and 22 years old) and lack of any visible means of support — Menendez didn’t take no for an answer.

“Call Ambassador asap,” he instructed a staffer who had been assigned to work the case. Melgen’s friend, described in the indictment as “Girlfriend 2,” and her sister then got their visas, prompting the staffer to email a colleague: “In my view, this is only due to the fact that RM [Robert Menendez] intervened. I’ve told RM.”

 

[phrodeau]

Clearly you hate American jurisprudence, and the principle of the presumption of innocence.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Clearly you hate American jurisprudence, and the principle of the presumption of innocence.

Did you ever hear of a former cop named Darren Wilson?

 

[mark_j]

Clearly you hate American jurisprudence, and the principle of the presumption of innocence.

Clearly that only holds true when it suits you. Otherwise, burn 'em at the stake!

Fucking hypocrite...

 

[miles]

Menendez must have done something to piss off The Regime.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

Menendez must have done something to piss off The Regime.

nope...its the "right" going after an innocent man

Jesus, the obama kind are really fucking retarded

 

[phrodeau]

Did you ever hear of a former cop named Darren Wilson?

What did he not do?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post

Did you ever hear of a former cop named Darren Wilson?

What did he not do?

He did commit murder when he killed the man who was attacking him.

 

[sr71plt]

What did he not do?

What he did not do, in legal terms, was what you have vilified him on this forum for doing. You were being handed your head in your hands over your hypocritical "presumed innocence" comment.

(Just keeping the score here.)

 

[phrodeau]

What he did not do, in legal terms, was what you have vilified him on this forum for doing. You were being handed your head in your hands over your hypocritical "presumed innocence" comment.

(Just keeping the score here.)

Moi? I posted all along against those who labeled Michael Brown as a criminal thug, when he never spent a day in court.

 

[sr71plt]

Moi? I posted all along against those who labeled Michael Brown as a criminal thug, when he never spent a day in court.

A. Being a thug doesn't require a conviction for anything (and you've been told this before).

B. The subject is your hypocrisy on "presumed innocence"--applying it to Menendez while having flaunted it on Darin Wilson (who has gone through the process and not been indicted for anything, even though you and others have repeated indicted him on this forum)--not Michael Brown.

I'm not after you for taking liberal positions here; I'm after you for dogmatically and inconsistently as partisanship requires running them over the hill, and thus tainting what I think can be liberalism and still retain objectivity. You are the one who introduced "presumption of innocence" into this thread--but you lost the right to stand on that concept lots of thread ago.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Moi? I posted all along against those who labeled Michael Brown as a criminal thug, when he never spent a day in court.

How do you know he never spent a day in court? Are you somehow privy to his juvenile record, if there is one?

 

[dan_c00000]

Of course, if Mnendez did do this it's quite wrong. But let's not forget cronyism isn't just limited to girlfriends. It also happened once to Busybody and vette's hero Bush II in the person of former FEMA director Michael D. Brown. And we all know how Hurricane Katrina turned out.

 

[sr71plt]

I always thought that Brown was just a name on a patronage list when he got his job. No? Not anything close to the Menendez case.

 

[phrodeau]

How do you know he never spent a day in court? Are you somehow privy to his juvenile record, it there is one?

If he had a juvenile record, everybody would know about it.

 

[sr71plt]

He does star in a video.

 

[Boxlicker101]

If he had a juvenile record, everybody would know about it.

Why? They are sealed, you know.

ETA: People have been trying to learn any details but to no avail, at least so far. The fact he has no serious felony convictions has been made public, but I'm almost certain he has some negatives on his record, such as battery. He was shown to be a thug when he roughed up the man in the convenience store, and I don't believe that was an isolated incident.

 

[phrodeau]

Why? They are sealed, you know.

EIA: People have been trying to learn any details but to no avail, at least so far. The fact he has no serious felony convictions has been made public, but I'm almost certain he has some negatives on his record, such as battery. He was shown to be a thug when he roughed up the man in the convenience store, and I don't believe that was an isolated incident.

His name has been in the national news for months. If he had any juvie offenses, some of the people involved would have come forward by now. But there hasn't been even one.

 

[miles]

Originally Posted by phrodeau View Post
If he had a juvenile record, everybody would know about it.

He was a fine, upstanding young man.

 

[Boxlicker101]

His name has been in the national news for months. If he had any juvie offenses, some of the people involved would have come forward by now. But there hasn't been even one.

What makes you think that? The people who would know would be probation officers and juvenile court judges and people like that, who would be tightly constrained against giving out that info, and his friends and family who would not want it to become common knowledge.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

Clearly that only holds true when it suits you. Otherwise, burn 'em at the stake!

Fucking hypocrite...

clearly, you are a fucking retard

fucking hypocrite dumpAss

 

[NeverEndingMe]

I always thought that Brown was just a name on a patronage list when he got his job. No? Not anything close to the Menendez case.

clearly Menendez has upset the regime... at the criminal terrorist cunt that worked at the IRS and the obama regime has rewarded her for going after American's

be part of the regime, it pays. just ask lois lerner

 

[dan_c00000]

I always thought that Brown was just a name on a patronage list when he got his job. No? Not anything close to the Menendez case.

Tell that to all those people who lost their lives, housing, and anything else they had. See which one is actually more important.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

Tell that to all those people who lost their lives, housing, and anything else they had. See which one is actually more important.

just proof that the obama kind are criminals and enemies of freedom

 

[sr71plt]

Tell that to all those people who lost their lives, housing, and anything else they had. See which one is actually more important.

What does that have to do with the issue at hand? The thread issue has nothing to do with your post.

Are you or anyone else saying that Brown was a Bush crony before he was appointed? Even then, the appointment of Brown has absolutely nothing to do with the issues of the Menendez case. It's just another irrelevant smear posting.

Are people's arguments for their positions so weak here that they have to make shit up?