Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is absolutely correct...also, they hold much less sway over what individual anchors do than what folks realize. It's more about market share(ratings and audience size) than anything else.Are run by MBAs in suits who sit on the boards of interlocking corporate directorates. Any bias they might have would not be in a leftward direction.
No, we have no reason to believe that. The only "agenda" the media has is attraction of eyeballs.How about we all agree that there is a problem. Frankly, I think arguing over whether the problem is left leaning or right leaning is missing the point.
Does anyone agree that the media is propaganda that works on it's own agenda, and not in our best interests? Maybe if we find common ground on that point, we can focus some energy on the problem itself.
See the OP. If it were propaganda, it would be propaganda with whatever message favors big business.Have no reason to believe that the media is propaganda? Is that your position?
See, you're trying to start a blame argument, but you're not willing to admit that there is a problem to begin with.See the OP. If it were propaganda, it would be propaganda with whatever message favors big business.
No. What reason do we have to think that the MSM, as a whole, is propaganda? The MSM is a business.See, you're trying to start a blame argument, but you're not willing to admit that there is a problem to begin with.
Is it propaganda or no?
If it is propaganda, then let's join together against it. If it isn't propaganda, then what is the point of this thread?
Is it propaganda or no?
The point is that so many RWs seem to take it as a proven fact that there is.So, you do not believe that there is any bias in the MSM.
Okay, what is the fucking point of this thread?
No. What reason do we have to think that the MSM, as a whole, is propaganda? The MSM is a business.
As with the Southern strategy and the sense that the good white Christians out there are the real victims, it goes back to Nixon.How did this whole "liberal media bias" canard get started, anyway?
Years ago I read an article in The New York Times that said that few people like to investigate other opinions (like I do). They want their opinions to be confirmed. The article said that most liberals do not want to be told anything bad about homosexuals and blacks. Those are issues where the mainstream media can take liberal stands in ways that do not challenge the economic interests of the people who own and run the United States.How did this whole "liberal media bias" canard get started, anyway?
Utter bullshit.Are run by MBAs in suits who sit on the boards of interlocking corporate directorates. Any bias they might have would not be in a leftward direction.
Does the OP remind you of anyone?Utter bullshit.
Complete balderdash.
These companies bend over backwards to send inclusive messages to the Left,
to stack their management positions with rainbow types and to finance all sorts of progressive programs.
And there's one reason why they do that. The Left is hateful, vindictive and activist
and will do everything in their power to harm and diminish any company
which they deem as counterproductive to their aims and ambitions.
The right is simply just too passive to stand up to the thugs.
Bias has nothing to do with the bottom line of
business (profit) reality...
Peck's assumptions are almost always diametrically opposed to the truth.Are run by MBAs in suits who sit on the boards of interlocking corporate directorates. Any bias they might have would not be in a leftward direction.
Who do you think runs these outlets? You think the fact that nearly every form of media is owned by 6 companies means the Democrats have full control of things?Peck's assumptions are almost always diametrically opposed to the truth.