The London march was good...

p_p_man

The 'Euro' European
Joined
Feb 18, 2001
Posts
24,253
but from a ground's eye point of view we didn't see the whole picture. Not until we saw the news coverage on TV.

What I saw were people from Middle Britain on the march, people of all ages, people who brought along sandwiches and flasks of hot chocolate to keep warm, people who brought their kids, people who had never marched before.

They talked excitedly among themselves as they walked in the bitter wind to Hyde Park. Not for them the singing of songs, the chanting of slogans or the carrying of banners. This was the backbone of Britain on the march, this wasn't political, this was a people who felt personally that the war is wrong. This was a depth of feeling that was almost tangible, even in its silence and felt by each and every one of those who marched.

At first as we were shepherded towards the end of the vast crowd ahead of us, there was just a hushed murmuring, just people talking to people they knew, who had travelled on the same bus or on the same train as themselves from all parts of the United Kingdom. But as we got into our stride our circle of acquaintances grew wider as we marched with strangers at first, but who quickly became firm marching buddies on the way.

I even saw two middle aged women admiring each others family photographs, making the usual "Ahhh" sounds as they studied in detail the babies of the photographic group.

This wasn't a march for the the politicos, the crazies, the nutters, this was a march for the people...

And as we marched we felt proud, proud that we had the strength of our belief to get up at some ungodly hour of the morning and in some cases make a round trip of 400 miles to show the depth of our feelings...

So we marched. The backbone of our country marched en masse to show our protest at the way two leaders of two countries can go to war on the flimsiest of excuses.

And after it was all over I presume my fellow marchers in the group I found myself in went home. Went home to Plymouth (Hi John, Susan and son Simon), to Weymouth (Hi Tony), to Leeds (Hi Christine and sister Joan) and to Glasgow (Hi Norrie, Linda and Jamie whom you told me to call wee Jamie so that I wouldn't get confused with his uncle Jamie - I hope you drove safely on the way back)

Me? I was lucky. I only had a comparatively short train journey to Bornemouth where I went for the weekend.

But for all of us that marched there were many, many more who didn't...

But who shared our sentiments...

ppman
 
Last edited:
I monitored it on the news on and off all day; it was indeed very impressive.
 
How was the weather?
They don't charge you a fee for congesting the streets do they?
Did you carry a sign? If so, what'd it say?
Are you contented after sharing with fellow protesters?
 
Lost Cause said:
How was the weather?
They don't charge you a fee for congesting the streets do they?
Did you carry a sign? If so, what'd it say?
Are you contented after sharing with fellow protesters?

a) Freezing
b) No. No though I carried someone else's whilst he lit a cigarette
c) No. Much more has to be done...

ppman
 
Quo Vadis?

More protests?
More e-mails?
Assasinations?
Delay tactics until Iraq can get VX to Northern Europe?

Give Iraq more time to hunt down and kill more opposition while we wait?

I don't think I would like being a part of any movement that gives aid and comfort to an enemy of humanity, and being part responsible for more murders and rape gangs in Iraq.

But, that's just me.

www.uruklink.net
 
Didn't walk, but watch on TV and read online. Went out later after the march and dang! So many people on the streets. Amazing.

/LP
 
Originally posted by p_p_man (edited)
This wasn't a march for the the politicos, the crazies, the nutters, this was a march for the people...

What you consider to be politicos, crazies and nutters are also people.
 
If this many people turn out in freezing weather, imagine how big the crowds will be in the spring and summer!
 
Re: Oz Marches Against the U$-Iraq War

Don K Dyck said:
Hi ppman . . . there was also a very big turnout in Oz . . .

MILLIONS MARCH IN OZ

Yes I caught up with all the news on Sunday. Even New York where I understood marches were banned outside the UN building, had a crowd of 500,000...

ppman
 
REDWAVE said:
If this many people turn out in freezing weather, imagine how big the crowds will be in the spring and summer!
None. It will be over by then.

Sucks to be you.

TB4p
 
teddybear4play said:
None. It will be over by then.

Sucks to be you.

TB4p

I wouldn't be so sure...

From today's New York Times:

"Senior Bush administration officials are for the first time openly discussing a subject they have sidestepped during the buildup of forces around Iraq: what could go wrong, and not only during an attack but also in the aftermath of an invasion.

Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld has a four- to five-page, typewritten catalog of risks that senior aides say he keeps in his desk drawer. He refers to it constantly, updating it with his own ideas and suggestions from senior military commanders, and discussing it with President Bush...

If there is one thing that haunts administration planners it is the thought of a protracted conflict, which could lead to increased casualties. "How long will this go on?" one senior administration official asked. "Three days, three weeks, three months, three years?" Even some of this official's aides winced as they contemplated the last time frame on that list."


ppman
 
One phrase gives you away here . . .

p_p_man said:
but also in the aftermath of an invasion.
That will be the harder and more time-consuming part. However, barring any WMD attacks on our troops (which will only rally the world to our cause), the actual attack phase will take weeks.

TB4p
 
p_p_man said:
I wouldn't be so sure...

From today's New York Times:

"Senior Bush administration officials are for the first time openly discussing a subject they have sidestepped during the buildup of forces around Iraq: what could go wrong, and not only during an attack but also in the aftermath of an invasion.

Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld has a four- to five-page, typewritten catalog of risks that senior aides say he keeps in his desk drawer. He refers to it constantly, updating it with his own ideas and suggestions from senior military commanders, and discussing it with President Bush...

If there is one thing that haunts administration planners it is the thought of a protracted conflict, which could lead to increased casualties. "How long will this go on?" one senior administration official asked. "Three days, three weeks, three months, three years?" Even some of this official's aides winced as they contemplated the last time frame on that list."
ppman

Hi ppman . . . it's starting to sound just like the Vietnam "victory" . . . 1963, we'll go in with military advisers for a quick fix . . . and in 1975 the U$ military was chased out of Saigon by the NVA . . . not bad . . . just a "slight" miscalculation of 10 1/2 years . . . too bad about the many fine men left rotting on the battlefields . . . or executed by the NVA while POWs . . . :)

Don't forget to take a comfortable bodybag, TB . . . :)
 
Back
Top