The Libertarian Party: Still Going Strong at 30

Todd

Virgin
Joined
Jan 1, 2001
Posts
6,893
By David F. Nolan

It seems hard to believe that 30 years have passed since a small group
of young idealists, most of us just out of college, met in Colorado
Springs to launch the Libertarian Party.

Our inspirations ranged from Thomas Jefferson and John Stuart Mill to
Ayn Rand and Robert Heinlein. We were passionate in our belief that no
individual should be sacrificed to satisfy some collective "need" or
plan; that all people should be free to pursue their own dreams in
their own way, so long as they do not use force or fraud to harm
others.

The ideal of individual liberty is an age-old dream, but one which has
been violated by governments throughout human history, and our hardy
group saw that neither of the two major American parties was true to
that vision. Republican and Democratic politicians give occasional lip
service to individual rights and liberty, but they are only too willing
to violate those rights to attain their goal of the moment.

And it is our unswerving devotion to individual liberty, I believe,
that has given the Libertarian Party its enduring strength. That
strength has enabled it to grow despite the strong institutional bias
toward a "two-party system" -- not mentioned, by the way, in any of our
nation's founding documents.

Currently, there are 240,000 voters registered as Libertarians, and 298
Libertarians hold elective office, more than all other third parties
combined.

According to research by Richard Winger, one of the most respected
third-party experts in the country, the Libertarian Party is the most
successful alternative party of the past half-century. Winger found
that Libertarians accounted for the largest number of gubernatorial and
Senatorial candidates obtaining the highest percentages in races from
1948 through 2000 -- more than the Reform Party, the Greens, or George
Wallace's American Independent Party.

Last year, 256 Libertarians ran for the U.S. House -- the first time in
80 years that any third party had contested a majority of Congressional
seats. And they polled a total of 1.7 million votes, the largest number
ever received by any third party slate. In Massachusetts, U.S. Senate
candidate Carla Howell received 12 percent of the vote in a three-way
race, coming within a point or two of beating the Republican!

The Libertarian Party has helped to fundamentally shift the nature of
American political debate -- even though it has yet to elect a member
of Congress or a president. Libertarian ideas that were considered
outlandish 20 years ago -- like replacing the bankrupt Social Security
system with private retirement accounts, getting rid of the income tax
and the IRS, ending the War on Drugs, and so on -- are now part of
mainstream political debate.

And yet the news media have largely overlooked this evidence that the
Libertarian message has a broad and enduring appeal in America. Perhaps
it is because our culture is obsessed with celebrities, and the
Libertarian Party has never had a "celebrity" candidate for president,
such as a George Wallace, Ross Perot, or Ralph Nader.

But whatever the reason, the Libertarian Party isn't going to go away.

Indeed, as other alternative parties struggle or fade, the Libertarian
Party is clearly the only viable national alternative to the Democrats
and Republicans.

In 2002, we will once again be fielding candidates in a majority of
Congressional districts. In most races, these candidates will be the
only choice for voters who are deeply concerned about the ill-conceived
and dangerous Security State measures that have been hastily enacted by
Congress. We are in a time of tremendous change, and I believe that
Americans are soon going to have to choose between a lot more freedom
and a lot less freedom.

We are living more and more in a system in which people are no longer
innocent until proven guilty. More and more, we are living in a state
where it is presumed that the government controls everything, and that
Americans have to get the government's permission to do almost
anything. Ten years ago, you didn't even need to show identification to
get onto an airplane; today you have to show some kind of "government-
issued" ID to check into many hotels.

The question is, can we turn that around? I don't know. But I sincerely
believe the Libertarian Party is the last, best hope for freedom in
America.

Thirty years ago, when the Libertarian Party was founded, we were moved
by the idea expressed so well in the Rascals song: "All the world over,
so easy to see, people everywhere just want to be free."

They still do.

David F. Nolan founded the Libertarian Party with a group of friends in
Colorado Springs on December 11, 1971. He currently lives in Mission
Viejo, CA.
 
NOT FOR ME

The Libertarian Party platform calls for ending ending all controls on wages, prices, rents, profits, interest rates, stocks, free trade and banks. They imagine the corporate fatcats will still keep your best interests in mind without any pesky regulations from that nosey government.

They also call for ending anti-trust laws, the FDIC, work place safety regulations, corporate income taxes, and government subsidies for public education. Not quite the things that give me the "Of, by, and for the people." feeling. I don't want to see Social Security and public services privatized by the lowest bidder.

Wasn't most of this platform pushed by George W. Bush last year?
 
Re: NOT FOR ME

pdx39 said:
The Libertarian Party platform calls for ending ending all controls on wages, prices, rents, profits, interest rates, stocks, free trade and banks. They imagine the corporate fatcats will still keep your best interests in mind without any pesky regulations from that nosey government.

They also call for ending anti-trust laws, the FDIC, work place safety regulations, corporate income taxes, and government subsidies for public education. Not quite the things that give me the "Of, by, and for the people." feeling. I don't want to see Social Security and public services privatized by the lowest bidder.

Wasn't most of this platform pushed by George W. Bush last year?
I find it interesting that you reject the principles of freedom, individual rights and personal responsibility. If you want to live in a collectivist state, there are multitudes of them across the face of the earth. You are always free to emigrate. Is it that you would rather see those who value their freedom enslaved than move where you can already find the slavery you admire?

And no, Bush did not offer a Libertarian platform by any stretch.

Originally posted by unregistered
the libs are the green party of the right
If ignorance is bliss, you must be ecstatic.
 
Re: Re: NOT FOR ME

Not only did President Bush offer anything remotely resembling a Libertarian platform, his platform was so distasteful to me that I changed my party affiliation to Libertarian. I did about three months of research before making the change.


Though I can not agree with everything on the party's platform, I truly believe the Libertarians are moving in the right direction to give this country what it needs.
 
STILL NOT FOR ME

I do not regect the principles of freedom, individual rights and personal responsibility for people, but I sure do for corporations. I can't understand why the LIbs are still not a major party after 30 years of pushing most of the same anti-labor, anti-environment, pro-corporate rights agenda as the Reps.

QUOTE]Originally posted by Unclebill
If ignorance is bliss, you must be ecstatic. [/QUOTE]

Who can argue with logic like that? You must have loved Bush's "Either you are with us, or you are against us." speech.
 
30?...30?

Please tell me your joking...

It's not even out of diapers yet...

:)
 
A Libertarian thread: Where nothing is a short answer question.
 
I vote Libertarian. I also believe the government should be scaled back. Someone here seems afraid of losing certain aspects of the public largess, but pray tell me, which government program has solved it's stated problem and subsequently been dismantled due to victory, if you catch my drift?
 
You are dealing with humans

SINthysist said:
I vote Libertarian. I also believe the government should be scaled back. Someone here seems afraid of losing certain aspects of the public largess, but pray tell me, which government program has solved it's stated problem and subsequently been dismantled due to victory, if you catch my drift?

The problems never go away. Never will under the Libertarians, Democrats, Republicans, Greens, Independents etc. The programs only seek to mitigate the damage already done. As long as Big Business controls government (and they do, Bush is up to his armpits with Enron) the working man will be screwed.

Pray tell, what do the Libs propose to do about pollution? The poor? Education?

Do they actually propose any viable solutions or do they just bitch and moan about what's in place already.

The Republicans did the same thing the past 8 years, they spent that whole time hounding Clinton and did little to come up with any new ideas. Contract with America? Gimme a break...that went over like a lead balloon.

Out.
 
Last edited:
I'VE CHANGED MY TUNE

Fuck the middle class and the poor. Vote Libertarian!

Who needs pesky regulations that deny some corporation it's god given right to put PCBs and lead in my drinking water? They have the right to pollute, and no government should ever be able to deny it to them!

Our food quality standards are stopping pesticide covered fruit from entering the the US out of South America. This is a trade barrier and hinders the right of big business to make a buck. Let's bring DDT back into our food chain.

How dare anyone try to make Firestone recall it's bad tires! These regulations are holding our country back and need to be removed, just like the Libertarians want. Throw out the lemon law too. It is another trade barrier.

Agree with them or be labed as a brain dead know nothing commie and be told to leave the country you were born in.
 
MORE LIKE....

Republicans on mind altering steroids. :confused:
 
I've been a member of the Libertarian Party for about 15 years. I still find it "amusing" to witness the absolute ignorance of those that enjoy being in the U.S., but have not one clue into the concepts of its base principles.
The LP is comprised of all swings of the political spectrum. We respect people for their disagreement, so long as it's based in intelligent and informed choices. We don't isolate groups as being, "fatcats", or "big ----- companies" like those with a Marxist bend. We argue the principles of our Constitution, not failed forms of totalitarian control.
Go to LP.org and see and think for yourself. Don't dumb yourself down by listening to those who manipulate you with "statistics" and "facts" that are loaded to divide "us against them". Ever hear of divide and conquer?
If this republic fails, I don't want it to go with a whimper because morons spoon fed by those who seek to dominate their lives, fight among themselves.
We are Americans first.
 
Jus so's ya know...

I form my own opinions. I am too intelligent to be easily manipulated. (that is not bragging, advertisers try to manipulate and they would hate to have me in their marketing studies) I can read statistics and know when they have been presented in a one sided fashion and when they are accurate. Just because a fact, a bit of data or a statistic doesn't gibe with the Libertarian perception of the world or support their belief, doesn't make it a lie.

The only way I can see and think for myself is to go to the LP website and buy into your propaganda? I did...and I don't. Propaganda is propaganda no matter what side it comes from. The far left has it's agenda as well as the far right. The Libertarians will always be on the margin because compromise isn't in their playbook. Compromise is the way this government works. It's all or nothing with the LP.

The cut and paste article was a glowing essay on finishing a distant third.

Actually this country has a one party system...half are democrats and half are republicans.:D The majority of them are firmly ensconced in the middle.
 
So there is no such thing as society, only the individual, Hey?

We've heard that before over here and the group that believed it have been all but wiped out, when the voters realised how much damage the individuals with power do to the individuals without.
Go ahead try it - you'll hate it!
 
how much damage the individuals with power do to the individuals without

Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Put a Libertarian in office and in short order he/she will fall victim to the narcotic that power is. They think they are above it...it's all about money and how to get more of it. That is one of the tenets of Libertarianism isn't it? Amassing personal wealth. And isn't selling your vote in Congress to the highest contributing PAC a perverted form of capitalism?

What's your drug...

Money
Sex
Power

Literotica?;)
 
What a bunch of uninformed, bigoted statements in this thread. Some are just plain stupid. No wonder the same shitheads keep getting re-elected.
 
miles

Just so I am clear on this, anyone who doesn't buy into or agree with the Libertarian dogma is uninformed and bigoted?

Just wanted to be sure of things.
 
Very weak Thumper

Extremely lame. Either you don't understand what I said or you are deliberately distorting my words. As you said, you are completely unclear.

.
Bigoted means someone intolerant of the views of others. I was being kind calling some of it uninformed. Lies is more accurate:

Wasn't most of this platform pushed by George W. Bush last year?


That is one of the tenets of Libertarianism isn't it? Amassing personal wealth. And isn't selling your vote in Congress to the highest contributing PAC

Agree with them or be labed as a brain dead know nothing commie and be told to leave the country you were born in.

Pray tell, what do the Libs propose to do about pollution? The poor? Education?

They imagine the corporate fatcats will still keep your best interests in mind without any pesky regulations from that nosey government.

the libs are the green party of the right


High school debate stuff
 
Thumper again, let us pose the question:

Why do all government programs have the right to expand and grow without producing results?

Having been born in the late 50's, I have lived in an era of rapid government expansion and ever growing entitlements. Yet every election cycle, the Left jumps up and tells me how bad America is, how bad the poor have it, how uneducated we are, and how we, whom have made it despite how bad things are must give more, and more, and more. At what time does the Democratic Party come out and claim some victory in some avenue and announce that some program has suceeded and can indeed be at least reduced, or maybe even held to current levels of spending.

Excuse me, I am wrong on one account. But you failed to call me on it. The one program that has been cut would be called the military, since victory was declared after the cold war, and the Liberal position was the only enemy left in the world was us, the bullies of the world and we were scaring everyone else and hence should unilaterally disarm.

But, it is in the area of social programs that we seem to be a dismal failure. So since the military seemed to be so successful that it could be disbanded, perhaps if we apply that model to the problems of the poor, the elderly, the homeless, the spotted owl, the three-legged rabid skunk, racial profiling, hate crimes, hate speech (which still is free speech in my book)...
 
Back
Top