the intellectual part of my search for happiness

[lonely_hubby60]

This ad does not stand on its own; my other “September ad” is an integral part of it http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1552684 And here I like to expand a little on this -- hard to understand perhaps -- concept of intellect + sapiosexuality.

I have always found learning a most suspenseful undertaking, starting as a boy already. Sex became part of it shortly thereafter, albeit with boys first. Simply because I knew far too few girls. And I find that learning all by itself creates pleasurable experiences already. Maybe out of naivete perhaps. But perhaps it is more than only this.

And (one of) the highest pleasure I can enjoy is hook up with an intellectual woman. And us exploring and learning together. Learning about each other's sexuality as well, but also regarding matters other than sex. My only problems now: intellectual women frequent the Personals so very rarely. And of the ones who do, very few read an ad of mine, and even fewer PM me back on one.

At the university, the only intellectual women I met at first were ugly -- I studied engineering. But then I ran into a teacher, and later an English Lit major, and things began improving for me. … So what could it be, that binds two sapiosexual people together in such tight bonds? One aspect I can imagine: when two people who enjoy sex with one another, love also intellectual explorations together, that adds some more to their erotic bliss. Not only will your nipples and your clit react to my fingers and my mouth so heavenly; no I am counting on your mind to react just the same.

So really, what I am after with so much craving, is a woman who reacts to me with benevolence first, and with some affection later. Be it from fondling her nipples or be it from fondling her mind. So it is fondling I am after, deep down inside myself, and receiving back responsive reactions from my most favorite occupation in life: fondling various aspects and body parts of a woman who turns me on.

Now I am hoping for a receptive reaction to my ad -- from a woman who craves as much as I do, to “live out” her own sapiosexuality. As much also as living out your sexuality, I mean.

 

[Daisy_Love]

You’re hoping for a receptive reaction to….

My only problems now: intellectual women frequent the Personals so very rarely. And of the ones who do, very few read an ad of mine, and even fewer PM me back on one.

At the university, the only intellectual women I met were ugly -- I studied engineering. But then I ran into a teacher, and later an English Lit major, and things began improving for me.

Good luck with your search for intellectual women after posting your condescending, judgemental views! Let us know how that goes for you.

 

[lonely_hubby60]

You’re hoping for a receptive reaction to….
.......

Good luck with your search for intellectual women after posting your condescending, judgemental views! Let us know how that goes for you.

Dear Daisy Love, I’ll be glad to report to you later on my success -- or lack thereof. But one thing is for sure: I am NOT looking for women who consider themselves intellectual, merely by digging up citations of other people. Which seems to be your specialty here.

Copying the thoughts of others. IMHO, is not any better than the scribes employed by monasteries in the Dark Ages. … I rather look for a woman who enjoys thinking independently. And who considers it an honor, and not condescending when I find her smarter than the average Jane on this board.

 

[Jake069258]

Dear Daisy Love, I’ll be glad to report to you later on my success -- or lack thereof. But one thing is for sure: I am NOT looking for women who consider themselves intellectual, merely by digging up citations of other people. Which seems to be your specialty here.

Copying the thoughts of others. IMHO, is not any better than the scribes employed by monasteries in the Dark Ages. … I rather look for a woman who enjoys thinking independently. And who considers it an honor, and not condescending when I find her smarter than the average Jane on this board.

Dude... I am giving you mad props for originality. And for being VERY specific about what you are looking for, dont settle for anything but what makes you happy. But dont you think Daisy has a point? Yes she quoted you, she didnt want to paraphrase what you said. She wanted to be very specific about what she was commenting on. That is not a sign of a lack of intelligence on her part. Quite the opposite in fact. I hope you find what you are looking for my man.

 

[Daisy_Love]

Which seems to be your specialty here.

Interesting that you think that, isn’t it!
You presume Lonely_hubby that I don’t think independently because I dug up your citations. Or because I’ve dug them up before from your alts. I mean, why else would think it’s my speciality.

 

[Escierto]

It’s the same fucking guy every time. LTMMC.

 

[lonely_hubby60]

Interesting that you think that, isn’t it!
You presume Lonely_hubby that I don’t think independently because I dug up your citations. Or because I’ve dug them up before from your alts. I mean, why else would think it’s my speciality.

I deeply apologize for writing my comment so unclearly. I was NOT referring to you Daisy quoting me just now, but instead I referred to your supposedly intellectual thread. The one on which you do nothing other than copy and paste famous (and unfamous) words by other people.

Apologies again for my not making this clearer.

 

[lonely_hubby60]

Dude... I am giving you mad props for originality. And for being VERY specific about what you are looking for, dont settle for anything but what makes you happy. But dont you think Daisy has a point? Yes she quoted you, she didnt want to paraphrase what you said. She wanted to be very specific about what she was commenting on. That is not a sign of a lack of intelligence on her part. Quite the opposite in fact. I hope you find what you are looking for my man.

First of all, thank you for your friendly words! And as far as quotes from Daisy goes, I was referring to a long thread of hers, not her post today.

 

[Daisy_Love]

I deeply apologize for writing my comment so unclearly. I was NOT referring to you Daisy quoting me just now, but instead I referred to your supposedly intellectual thread. The one on which you do nothing other than copy and paste famous (and unfamous) words by other people.

Apologies again for my not making this clearer.

Ohhhhh you mean the images and quotes on my thread? Lonely_hubby, MMM_wms, LTMS or whoever you are today!!

I have never pretended they were my thoughts, they are images, quotes that catch my eye. Sooooo, you can’t be intelligent because you don’t write your own quotes? Is that what you’re saying Lonely_hubby?

 

[Jake069258]

First of all, thank you for your friendly words! And as far as quotes from Daisy goes, I was referring to a long thread of hers, not her post today.

All good dude. *fist bump*

But i do have to say... Im sensing some backtracking going on right now on your part...

 

[Lonelywife1205]

All good dude. *fist bump*

But i do have to say... Im sensing some backtracking going on right now on your part...

Jake be careful who you fist bump…this one’s been busy fondling one of his three greasy little penises.

 

[Jake069258]

Jake be careful who you fist bump…this one’s been busy fondling one of his three greasy little penises.

Hahahahaha. Ok

*washes hands*

 

[KatieDoes]

Jake be careful who you fist bump…this one’s been busy fondling one of his three greasy little penises.

Ha! That cracked me up.

And yeah…. This guy loathes women.

Insufferable twatwaffle.

 

[Fingerfuxs]

Ha! That cracked me up.

And yeah…. This guy loathes women.

Insufferable twatwaffle.

waves to Katie hey katie nice use of the word twat waffle , Next time I’m at wallet house house I’m going to ask for a twat waffle just to see what I get.

P.S. and your one post from getting your avatar wings too.

 

[KatieDoes]

waves to Katie hey katie nice use of the word twat waffle , Next time I’m at wallet house house I’m going to ask for a twat waffle just to see what I get.

P.S. and your one post from getting your avatar wings too.

Wallet House made me laugh.


I’ll let this be the post that gives me wings. Finally lonelylmtcwinswhatever has served some purpose.

 

[Lonelywife1205]

Wallet House made me laugh.

Jim Gaffigan has a great bit about Waffle House. That their motto should be ‘It’s 2 am. You still have time for one more bad decision’

I’ll let this be the post that gives me wings. Finally lonelylmtcwinswhatever has served some purpose.

*patiently waits for Katie’s boobatar*

 

[Fingerfuxs]

Wallet House made me laugh.

Jim Gaffigan has a great bit about Waffle House. That their motto should be ‘It’s 2 am. You still have time for one more bad decision’

I’ll let this be the post that gives me wings. Finally lonelylmtcwinswhatever has served some purpose.

Hahahahaha like Red Bull , it gave you wings.

 

[Ratchetman1982]

Hahahahaha like Red Bull , it gave you wings.

"People who use quotes in their posts are people" - Me

 

[Punkrockchick]

This ad does not stand on its own; my other “September ad” is an integral part of it http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1552684 And here I like to expand a little on this -- hard to understand perhaps -- concept of intellect + sapiosexuality.

I have always found learning a most suspenseful undertaking, starting as a boy already. Sex became part of it shortly thereafter, albeit with boys first. Simply because I knew far too few girls. And I find that learning all by itself creates pleasurable experiences already. Maybe out of naivete perhaps. But perhaps it is more than only this.

And (one of) the highest pleasure I can enjoy is hook up with an intellectual woman. And us exploring and learning together. Sexually as well, but also regarding matters other than sex. My only problems now: intellectual women frequent the Personals so very rarely. And of the ones who do, very few read an ad of mine, and even fewer PM me back on one.

At the university, the only intellectual women I met were ugly -- I studied engineering. But then I ran into a teacher, and later an English Lit major, and things began improving for me. … So what could it be, possibly, that binds two sapiosexual people together in such tight bonds? Only aspect I can imagine: when two people enjoying sex with one another, loving also intellectual explorations together, that “purifies” their erotic bliss some more. Not only will her nipples and her clit react to my fingers and my mouth so heavenly; no her mind reacts just the same.

So really, honestly and truly, what I am after with so much craving, is a woman who reacts to me with love and affection. Be it from fondling her nipples or be it from fondling her mind. So it is fondling I am after, deep down inside myself, and receiving back responsive reactions from my most favorite occupation in life: fondling various parts of a woman who turns me on.

Now I am hoping for a receptive reaction to my ad -- from a woman who craves as much as I do, to “live out” her own sapiosexuality.

Blah blah blah. I'm so fucking smart. Watch me use nickel words but fail at tenses and sentence structure. This ad screams pompous asshole. Ladies beware.

 

[Ratchetman1982]

So, Inspector Gadget. He has all of these cool things implanted in his body that help with his job, but this self-mutilation seems a bit concerning. Is he replacing parts of himself that he is not happy with? Is there someone special, perhaps a dead wife that he was unable to save with his mortal body, that inspired this metamorphosis? Has modern society jaded him to the point of systematically removing himself from humankind, one body part at a time? Or are these just tools to make his job easier?

 

[lonely_hubby60]

people feeling compelled to comment on certain personal ads

Two very different things can happen here, when somebody posts an ad that’s longer than 5 or 10 sentences in a row. Either another person reads it, puts herself in the shoes of the ad poster, and writes a benevolent comment back. That does indeed occur now and then as a result of one of my ads.

More often however, some smartass stops by who won’t waste her time trying to understand the mindset of another person, and she coughs out something like you can read in post #2 here. Because for some strange reason an ad with a multitude of thoughts in it -- compared to the usual “I’m here to fuck you blind” kind of ad -- invites other people who have difficulties writing ads of their own, to try belittling the work of others.

And once that happens, often a lengthy pseudo “discussion” begins, with lots of others chiming in, which generally degrades into a name-calling session. Very very rarely someone steps in who appeals for a bit of fairness. Like that happened 3 years ago, and I am still exchanging a mail or two with her now and then.

Lengthy ads like mine seem to mobilize many Litsters who have nothing better to do than criticize others. I guess this sort of thing has been known at least since ancient Greece, when philosophers wandering about had to put up with know-nothings. It seems like humankind loves nothing better than taking somebody else’s thinking apart.

And I should never worry about that and welcome any comment instead, because after all, it increases the readership of my ad. So here comes a very much belated THANK YOU to Wild Daisie, for her contribution to inciting a “conversation” of sorts about an ad I wrote. Not a perfect ad, for sure, but I had something on my mind when I did so.

 

[KatieDoes]

No. It’s not the length of the ad. It’s the content. The toxic misogyny and entitlement that you spew in them.

I don’t mind bumping it, either. That just makes it easier for the women who’s pm’s you slither into to figure out what you are and saves them time.

 

[Daisy_Love]

Ohhhhh looky!! It’s number 3 alt
Do you have one for every day of the week?
Awww thanks for the acknowledgment for post 2

 

[kentuckymtnman]

No. It’s not the length of the ad. It’s the content. The toxic misogyny and entitlement that you spew in them.

I don’t mind bumping it, either. That just makes it easier for the women who’s pm’s you slither into to figure out what you are and saves them time.

Katie, you are too kind.

“the only intellectual women I met were ugly — I studied engineering”

As a person who studied engineering at one of the top ten programs in the US, your are an ass, and probably were intimidated by women who were smarter and more attractive than you. This comment is just plain ignorant, and uglier than the appearance any person I have ever met. Good luck.

 

[lonely_hubby60]

Hello back to you, KY man! I did not see your post until now.
And I begin to wonder, WHICH engineering school in the US ever accepted you. They cannot possibly be one of the top-10, because your logic reasoning simply SUCKS! – Just because you have never seen something – is in NO WAY a proof that it does not exist.

Also apparently you missed the rest of my prior statement: after I met that teacher, and the English Lit major, I had no problems for a long while, to meet BOTH intelligent AND highly sexual women.