The grandmother, alternatively...

[Magineer]

... is hunted down as prey.

Still, of course, the Helen Mirren type. Still...

She lost her husband some years ago and has never really stopped grieving or come 'out of her shell'. Our Johnny has lusted after her through his teens and has waited for his parents to leave the house to him for their weekend break away. As soon as he gets the 'we've got there' text from them, he starts preparing the house in... various ways... and then invites Granny over, on the pretext that it would be 'nice to have some company' and 'maybe she could help with making dinner'.

From where...

 

[DarkPleasures]

... is hunted down as prey.

Still, of course, the Helen Mirren type. Still...

She lost her husband some years ago and has never really stopped grieving or come 'out of her shell'. Our Johnny has lusted after her through age 18 and 19 and has waited for his parents to leave the house to him for their weekend break away. As soon as he gets the 'we've got there' text from them, he starts preparing the house in... various ways... and then invites Granny over, on the pretext that it would be 'nice to have some company' and 'maybe she could help with making dinner'.

From where...

I fixed an important Lit detail for you.

 

[Magineer]

The original is what is proposed. Lusting, i.e. thoughts, is not criminal activity. Actions are. Spot the similarity? Actions - activity..?

A simple differentiation, one might think, but clearly hard for some minds to grasp...

 

[gordo12]

The original is what is proposed. Lusting, i.e. thoughts, is not criminal activity. Actions are. Spot the similarity? Actions - activity..?

A simple differentiation, one might think, but clearly hard for some minds to grasp...

And clearly it is hard for some to grasp the fact that this is a private website. Run by people who have their own limits/rules. What is legal out there doesn't matter in here. Somebody with over 4700 posts gave you information that you, with 6 posts, shit on. Not very smart.

Lit has brightline of 18. This is from the FAQ for writers.

"The Everything FAQ

1. Characters exposed to sexual situations cannot be under 18, or look or act under 18. No exceptions or loopholes. It doesn't matter what era the story is placed in, magic and technology don't invalidate the rule, dream sequences still count.This rule has nothing to do with any laws anywhere; it's just Laurel's decision on this, her privately owned server. Don't do it or even ask about it.

 

[Magineer]

And clearly it is hard for some to grasp the fact that this is a private website. Run by people who have their own limits/rules. What is legal out there doesn't matter in here. Somebody with over 4700 posts gave you information that you, with 6 posts, shit on. Not very smart.

Lit has brightline of 18. This is from the FAQ for writers.

"The Everything FAQ

1. Characters exposed to sexual situations cannot be under 18, or look or act under 18. No exceptions or loopholes. It doesn't matter what era the story is placed in, magic and technology don't invalidate the rule, dream sequences still count.This rule has nothing to do with any laws anywhere; it's just Laurel's decision on this, her privately owned server. Don't do it or even ask about it.

So if you could kindly indicate how and where I have transgressed this oh-so-private 'rule'..?

You know, just to keep things logical and clear... (in respect of which, your implication that volume posting history is equivalent to worthiness of veneration does not exactly give you the best of intellectual starts)..?

 

[gordo12]

So if you could kindly indicate how and where I have transgressed this oh-so-private 'rule'..?

You know, just to keep things logical and clear... (in respect of which, your implication that volume posting history is equivalent to worthiness of veneration does not exactly give you the best of intellectual starts)..?

Well, no helping you. You obviously know better than people who have been here for years, so good luck. We've seen your personality type before and they don't survive here.

 

[Magineer]

Well, no helping you. You obviously know better than people who have been here for years, so good luck. We've seen your personality type before and they don't survive here.

So no answer to that one, then. As there couldn't be, as I have done nothing to contravene the rule you quoted so pompously.

You came rushing in to support someone who seems to make it his/her business to busybody their way around the posts of newcomers with a view to deliberate nitpicking. Very welcoming, I must say.

If your 'personality type' is the kind which 'survives here', then that certainly is highly informative...

 

[DarkPleasures]

The original is what is proposed. Lusting, i.e. thoughts, is not criminal activity. Actions are. Spot the similarity? Actions - activity..?

A simple differentiation, one might think, but clearly hard for some minds to grasp...

Actually, at Lit minors are not allowed to "think" about anything sexual either. No lusting before age 18. No "throughout his teens"...

 

[DarkPleasures]

Since you'd rather argue than listen to a seasoned member...

From the Literotica Forum Rules:

#2 You may not post sexually explicit pictures or stories featuring anyone under 18 years old.
Literotica does not allow the posting of underage or animal sex pictures - or links to such, or text/story posts/links to advocation thereof - on the forum. This includes discussions and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse.​

Story Submission Guidelines Specifically: "Basically, our biggest requirement is that we do not accept any story in which characters under the age of 18 are involved in sexual situations" AND 3. No sexual activity involving bestiality (you can write stories about supernatural beasts like ghosts, unicorns, werewolves, etc.) or underage persons will be considered. For the purposes of this site, the minimum legal age is 18. This site does not publish stories, articles, essays, or other material supporting, encouraging, or defending child abuse and/or exploitation.

This is a privately owned web site based in the United States. If you have a problem with the rules you can either 1.) leave, or 2.) go bitch to the site owners. (Laurel and Manu)

 

[Magineer]

Since you'd rather spout c rap rather than deal with logic and the precise use of English, I repeat: in what way does any of that apply to my posting?

I have not mentioned anyone being under 18 or engaging in sexual activity of any kind, nor is anyone thinking of or reminiscing about doing so.

Of course if you wish, for your own reasons, deliberately to place misconstructions upon my posting, that is your choice and something over which I have no control.

 

[DarkPleasures]

You stated he "had been lusting through his teens" and got all butthurt when I stated "through 18 and 19". You cannot hint or insinuate age 13 to 17 in anything sexual, including lusting.

 

[Magineer]

You stated he "had been lusting through his teens" and got all butthurt when I stated "through 18 and 19". You cannot hint or insinuate age 13 to 17 in anything sexual, including lusting.

My highlights.

Correct... which is to say that he IS NOT DOING SO in the narrative of the story.

Gold star for finally highlighting the point at issue. The rules refer only to what IS HAPPENING within the narrative or to a character THINKING of or REMINISCING about past actions. Present tense, if you can grasp that concept.

None of this happens in my OP - and it is impermissible to be construed logically. That you have done so is, as I have stated, your own deliberate choice based on God knows what - presumably a burning desire to lord it sanctimoniously over anyone new.

The rules say nothing about any pre-existing state (pluperfect tense, to those who can grasp it) which may be alluded to within the narrative. You may call this an error on the part of the site owners but that is hardly my concern. I have stayed within what is allowed as things stand currently.