The Grand Jury "No Bill"

[FGB]

Yes they did.

Did nothing wrong they said.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Kitty]

WAS creating ANOTHER thread necessary? You old men definitely need to find something better to do.

 

[Kitty]

Seems most of the witnesses supporting Wilson were black.

Is...that a problemo?

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

Not at all, it undermines the argument that Wilson was wrong in his actions.

Wrong again, spineless one. It simply shows the tremendous latitude given law enforcement officials in this day and age. A panicking cop literally got away with murder. It's "summary justice" at its finest.

 

[Kitty]

Well there's a plus side to this, folks. Murder...ain't no biggie! Raise those guns, assholes!

 

[Skiddles2014]

Is...that a problemo?

He's just a racist old douchebag.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Kitty]

In view of the multiple massive butt hurts you've suffered this month I'll overlook your error in assuming murder when in fact the Grand Jury said it wasn't. You do have a penchant of being judge jury and executioner...at least in front of the mirror.

You keep using "The Grand Jury" as a copout to excuse the fact that you can't even use your own pebbled brain to figure this shit out. There's knowing what other people say, and thinking for yourself, if only you could.

(Damn...I did it again. Why do I care what these internet morons have to say *slaps forehead* http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/images/smilies/doh.gif)

 

[RobDownSouth]

In view of the multiple massive butt hurts you've suffered this month I'll overlook your error in assuming murder when in fact the Grand Jury said it wasn't. You do have a penchant of being judge jury and executioner...at least in front of the mirror.

Wrong again, spineless one. It simply shows the tremendous latitude given law enforcement officials in this day and age. A panicking cop literally got away with murder. It's "summary justice" at its finest.

 

[Kitty]

Wrong again, spineless one. It simply shows the tremendous latitude given law enforcement officials in this day and age. A panicking cop literally got away with murder. It's "summary justice" at its finest.

Oh. You posted it twice. I thought I was losing it for a second. lol

 

[unregistered]

 

[Kitty]

Listen dummy, you aren't going to be charged with murder in the United States unless a Grand Jury says so.

Listen SMARTASS: the point is, despite what the GRAND JURY says (like people haven't been acquitted or incarcerated wrongfully ) is that YOU keep using what THEY say to minimize the fact that there COULD have been (and most likely WAS) an unjustified MURDER. FUCKING IDIOT.

 

[Kitty]

Oh I see. You think I'm some angsty wristcutter who will fall into some deep depression because you called me names on a website!

 

[unregistered]

 

[Que Va]

Wrong again, spineless one. It simply shows the tremendous latitude given law enforcement officials in this day and age. A panicking cop literally got away with murder. It's "summary justice" at its finest.

Wait...he panicked over a young black boy that was surrendering? I am confused now.

I don't think you know the meaning of either "literally" or "murder." This new scenario you invented (that also does not comport with the evidence) would be, (if true,) "manslaughter."

I assume that is one of the five counts that the grand jury was offered that it failed to return a true bill on.

Was there something not in the autopsy, or witness statement presented to the grand jury that you, uniquely are privy to?

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Que Va]

Listen SMARTASS: the point is, despite what the GRAND JURY says (like people haven't been acquitted or incarcerated wrongfully ) is that YOU keep using what THEY say to minimize the fact that there COULD have been (and most likely WAS) an unjustified MURDER. FUCKING IDIOT.

It isn't what the grand jury says, it is about what the evidence says to the grand jury. If the evidence did not rise to even the minimal standard to indict and order a trial be held, it is more than a stretch to say it "most likely was."

What you are saying is (assuming you even know what the evidence is now) that if you sat on that grand jury and swore to weigh the evidence impartially, that even if you were presented with insufficient evidence to justify charging him, you would vote to indict because "It mostly likely was unjustified murder."

Imagine you were on the grand jury for Michael Brown and he shot the cop because, he says, the cop was trying to shoot him. If the autopsy and the eyewitness accounts backed him up, would you vote to indict him anyway?

 

[Kitty]

Just look at the looting mentality in Furgeson and understand why so many black males are in the joint.

That has NOTHING to do with why Brown is dead, dipshit! People keep crying, white people are killed by cops too!! http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/images/smilies/cry.gif Yeah, at the most minimal level. But despite the fact that everyone commits crimes, it's the same story every month isn't it? Just because Brown wasn't a monk, it doesn't mean shoot him. Oh but the GRAND JURY said it's all right, so I'll just use that as an excuse to ignore the obvious.

 

[Kitty]

You really are a big stupid gas bag aren't you? Ignorant fuck. Murder is a legal term. There wasn't a murder, there will be no murder charges, it's over, so shut the fuck up.

You shut the fuck up. You were the first one to come running over here to say the same shit, dumb ass.

 

[Que Va]

Just look at the looting mentality in Furgeson and understand why so many black males are in the joint.

I don't agree with that statement. I think it is more a matter of what happens when people are indoctrinated to the idea that they live "in a Democracy" and that "majority rules."

People understandably (and incorrectly) believe that if the crowd calls for the gallows, the crowd deserves to get gallows.

Once the top two law enforcement officials in the land did nothing to quell that opinion and, in fact, encouraged it, a riot is foregone conclusion.

From Media, no one alive today hasn't seen first hand people walking out with TVs so people of any color will take advantage if they can.

 

[Kitty]

You want to point out all your textbook terms like you're fucking smart, but you can barely put A and B together. Fucking dickhead.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Just look at the looting mentality in Furgeson and understand why so many black males are in the joint.

"But if I don't actually say the word "nigger", it's not racist!" - The Vettebigot