The Founding Fathers Were Not Christians

sweetnpetite

Intellectual snob
Joined
Jan 10, 2003
Posts
9,135
The Founding Fathers Were Not Christians
by Steven Morris, in Free Inquiry, Fall, 1995 (If you want to complain about this article, complain to Steven Morris, who wrote it)

"The Christian right is trying to rewrite the history of the United States as part of its campaign to force its religion on others. They try to depict the founding fathers as pious Christians who wanted the United States to be a Christian nation, with laws that favored Christians and Christianity.

This is patently untrue. The early presidents and patriots were generally Deists or Unitarians, believing in some form of impersonal Providence but rejecting the divinity of Jesus and the absurdities of the Old and New testaments.

Thomas Paine was a pamphleteer whose manifestos encouraged the faltering spirits of the country and aided materially in winning the war of Independence:
I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of...Each of those churches accuse the other of unbelief; and for my own part, I disbelieve them all."
From:
The Age of Reason by Thomas Paine, pp. 8,9 (Republished 1984, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY)



George Washington, the first president of the United States, never declared himself a Christian according to contemporary reports or in any of his voluminous correspondence. Washington Championed the cause of freedom from religious intolerance and compulsion. When John Murray (a universalist who denied the existence of hell) was invited to become an army chaplain, the other chaplains petitioned Washington for his dismissal. Instead, Washington gave him the appointment. On his deathbed, Washinton uttered no words of a religious nature and did not call for a clergyman to be in attendance.
From:
George Washington and Religion by Paul F. Boller Jr., pp. 16, 87, 88, 108, 113, 121, 127 (1963, Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas, TX)


John Adams, the country's second president, was drawn to the study of law but faced pressure from his father to become a clergyman. He wrote that he found among the lawyers 'noble and gallant achievments" but among the clergy, the "pretended sanctity of some absolute dunces". Late in life he wrote: "Twenty times in the course of my late reading, have I been upon the point of breaking out, "This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it!"

It was during Adam's administration that the Senate ratified the Treaty of Peace and Friendship, which states in Article XI that "the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion."
From:
The Character of John Adams by Peter Shaw, pp. 17 (1976, North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC) Quoting a letter by JA to Charles Cushing Oct 19, 1756, and John Adams, A Biography in his Own Words, edited by James Peabody, p. 403 (1973, Newsweek, New York NY) Quoting letter by JA to Jefferson April 19, 1817, and in reference to the treaty, Thomas Jefferson, Passionate Pilgrim by Alf Mapp Jr., pp. 311 (1991, Madison Books, Lanham, MD) quoting letter by TJ to Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse, June, 1814.


Thomas Jefferson, third president and author of the Declaration of Independence, said:"I trust that there is not a young man now living in the United States who will not die a Unitarian." He referred to the Revelation of St. John as "the ravings of a maniac" and wrote:
The Christian priesthood, finding the doctrines of Christ levelled to every understanding and too plain to need explanation, saw, in the mysticisms of Plato, materials with which they might build up an artificial system which might, from its indistinctness, admit everlasting controversy, give employment for their order, and introduce it to profit, power, and pre-eminence. The doctrines which flowed from the lips of Jesus himself are within the comprehension of a child; but thousands of volumes have not yet explained the Platonisms engrafted on them: and for this obvious reason that nonsense can never be explained."
From:
Thomas Jefferson, an Intimate History by Fawn M. Brodie, p. 453 (1974, W.W) Norton and Co. Inc. New York, NY) Quoting a letter by TJ to Alexander Smyth Jan 17, 1825, and Thomas Jefferson, Passionate Pilgrim by Alf Mapp Jr., pp. 246 (1991, Madison Books, Lanham, MD) quoting letter by TJ to John Adams, July 5, 1814.

"The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter." -- Thomas Jefferson (letter to J. Adams April 11,1823)

James Madison, fourth president and father of the Constitution, was not religious in any conventional sense. "Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."
"During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity, in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution."
From:
The Madisons by Virginia Moore, P. 43 (1979, McGraw-Hill Co. New York, NY) quoting a letter by JM to William Bradford April 1, 1774, and James Madison, A Biography in his Own Words, edited by Joseph Gardner, p. 93, (1974, Newsweek, New York, NY) Quoting Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments by JM, June 1785.

Ethan Allen, whose capture of Fort Ticonderoga while commanding the Green Mountain Boys helped inspire Congress and the country to pursue the War of Independence, said, "That Jesus Christ was not God is evidence from his own words." In the same book, Allen noted that he was generally "denominated a Deist, the reality of which I never disputed, being conscious that I am no Christian." When Allen married Fanny Buchanan, he stopped his own wedding ceremony when the judge asked him if he promised "to live with Fanny Buchanan agreeable to the laws of God." Allen refused to answer until the judge agreed that the God referred to was the God of Nature, and the laws those "written in the great book of nature."
From:
Religion of the American Enlightenment by G. Adolph Koch, p. 40 (1968, Thomas Crowell Co., New York, NY.) quoting preface and p. 352 of Reason, the Only Oracle of Man and A Sense of History compiled by American Heritage Press Inc., p. 103 (1985, American Heritage Press, Inc., New York, NY.)



Benjamin Franklin, delegate to the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention, said:
As to Jesus of Nazareth, my Opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the System of Morals and his Religion...has received various corrupting Changes, and I have, with most of the present dissenters in England, some doubts as to his Divinity; tho' it is a question I do not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an opportunity of knowing the Truth with less trouble." He died a month later, and historians consider him, like so many great Americans of his time, to be a Deist, not a Christian.
From:
Benjamin Franklin, A Biography in his Own Words, edited by Thomas Fleming, p. 404, (1972, Newsweek, New York, NY) quoting letter by BF to Exra Stiles March 9, 1790.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Speaking of the independence of the first 13 States, H.G. Wells in his Outline of History, says:

"It was a Western European civilization that had broken free from the last traces of Empire and Christendom; and it had not a vestige of monarchy left, and no State Religion... The absence of any binding religious tie is especially noteworthy. It had a number of forms of Christianity, its spirit was indubitably Christian; but, as a State document of 1796 expicity declared: 'The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.'"

The words "In God We Trust" were not consistently on all U.S. currency until 1956, during the McCarthy Hysteria.

The Treaty of Tripoli, passed by the U.S. Senate in 1797, read in part: "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion." The treaty was written during the Washington administration, and sent to the Senate during the Adams administration. It was read aloud to the Senate, and each Senator received a printed copy. This was the 339th time that a recorded vote was required by the Senate, but only the third time a vote was unanimous (the next time was to honor George Washington). There is no record of any debate or dissension on the treaty. It was reprinted in full in three newspapers - two in Philadelphia, one in New York City. There is no record of public outcry or complaint in subsequent editions of the papers.

http://www.dimensional.com/~randl/founders.htm
 
shereads said:
You watch that language, mister. You've clearly fallen under the heathen influence of America's Founding Fathers.

Naw, I've fallen under Brian Marooney's influence.. Just like him, I want to create a new tax for my country, then steal from my own country, get away with it, then sue when the cops try to get me without enough evidence. :) He's my idol.
 
sweetnpetite said:
It was during Adam's administration that the Senate ratified the Treaty of Peace and Friendship, which states in Article XI that "the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion."

Treaty of Peace and Friendship? What were they, a bunch of school girls?

:eek:
Thomas Jefferson <snip> wrote: The Christian priesthood, finding the doctrines of Christ levelled to every understanding and too plain to need explanation, saw, in the mysticisms of Plato, materials with which they might build up an artificial system which might, from its indistinctness, admit everlasting controversy, give employment for their order, and introduce it to profit, power, and pre-eminence.
So the clergy aren't stupid, after all. This contradicts John Adams.
James Madison, fourth president and father of the Constitution, was not religious in any conventional sense. "Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."

Religious bondage? The founding fathers were worse than Unitarians; they were perverts!

:eek:
The words "In God We Trust" were not consistently on all U.S. currency until 1956, during the McCarthy Hysteria.

We had to put something about God there, or the Communists would have snuck in something about Karl Marx.


Thanks, SnP. I think I'll print the article out and send it along with my Christmas cards this year. Should make for some lively times around the dinner table when the family gets together.

:devil:
 
Last edited:
tolyk said:
Naw, I've fallen under Brian Marooney's influence.. Just like him, I want to create a new tax for my country, then steal from my own country, get away with it, then sue when the cops try to get me without enough evidence. :) He's my idol.

Ha! That's not corruption, that's just a hobby. In Miami, we have schoolboard members who get indicted for stuff worse than that during their lunch hour, and are bonded out before Happy Hour. The lucky ones get fired and live in the Bahamas on their severence packages.

They're Christians, too. Which means this was not a hijack.
 
Is this news to anyone who didn't fail high school civics?

What were you dumb fuckers doing? Smoking dope in the boys' locker room during fifth period? (Oh wait, that was me)

And 1995, that's a little stale, sweet. None of your kids were even born yet. Let pure show you how to google barely relevant articles to support your argument (if you have one, which it appears you don't).

Heaven forbid you'd actually read something from Thomas Paine or Ethan Allen, rather than quote a yahoo.com newsgroup article about them. Do you even know who those people are? What exactly is your point?

--Z
 
Seattle Zack said:
Is this news to anyone who didn't fail high school civics?

What were you dumb fuckers doing? Smoking dope in the boys' locker room during fifth period? (Oh wait, that was me)

And 1995, that's a little stale, sweet. None of your kids were even born yet. Let pure show you how to google barely relevant articles to support your argument (if you have one, which it appears you don't).

Heaven forbid you'd actually read something from Thomas Paine or Ethan Allen, rather than quote a yahoo.com newsgroup article about them. Do you even know who those people are? What exactly is your point?

--Z

What the hell crawled up your ass?
 
Seattle Zack said:
And 1995, that's a little stale, sweet.

Has early American history changed very much since 1995, Zack?

If this thread is not your cup of tea, why not have coffee or a soft drink? Or, to paraphrase a previous poster, what sort of creature has found its way inside your posterior orifice?

Edited to add: Where I went to school, we didn't have to learn all this American history stuff to pass civics class! We got credit for good attendance.

:eek:
 
Last edited:
This article paints a much different picture:

http://www.wallbuilders.com/resources/search/detail.php?ResourceID=29

(We receive numerous requests from across the country to answer various editorials and letters-to-the-editor. The subject is usually the religious persuasions of the Founding Fathers, and the standard assertion is that they were all deists. The following is but one of many possible replies to such accusations.)

I notice that your newspaper has an ongoing debate concerning the religious nature of the Founding Fathers. A recent letter claimed that most of the Founding Fathers were deists, and pointed to Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Paine, Hamilton, and Madison as proof. After making this charge, the writer acknowledged the "voluminous writings" of the Founders, but it appears that she has not read those writings herself. However, this is no surprise since the U. S. Department of Education claims that only 5 percent of high schools graduates know how to examine primary source documentation.

Interestingly, the claims in this recent letter to the editor are characteristic of similar claims appearing in hundreds of letters to the editor across the nation. The standard assertion is that the Founders were deists. Deists? What is a deist? In dictionaries like Websters, Funk & Wagnalls, Century, and others, the terms "deist," "agnostic," and "atheist" appear as synonyms. Therefore, the range of a deist spans from those who believe there is no God, to those who believe in a distant, impersonal creator of the universe, to those who believe there is no way to know if God exists. Do the Founders fit any of these definitions?

None of the notable Founders fit this description. Thomas Paine, in his discourse on "The Study of God," forcefully asserts that it is "the error of schools" to teach sciences without "reference to the Being who is author of them: for all the principles of science are of Divine origin." He laments that "the evil that has resulted from the error of the schools in teaching [science without God] has been that of generating in the pupils a species of atheism." Paine not only believed in God, he believed in a reality beyond the visible world.

In Benjamin Franklin's 1749 plan of education for public schools in Pennsylvania, he insisted that schools teach "the necessity of a public religion . . . and the excellency of the Christian religion above all others, ancient or modern." Consider also the fact that Franklin proposed a Biblical inscription for the Seal of the United States; that he chose a New Testament verse for the motto of the Philadelphia Hospital; that he was one of the chief voices behind the establishment of a paid chaplain in Congress; and that when in 1787 when Franklin helped found the college which bore his name, it was dedicated as "a nursery of religion and learning" built "on Christ, the Corner-Stone." Franklin certainly doesn't fit the definition of a deist.

Nor does George Washington. He was an open promoter of Christianity. For example, in his speech on May 12, 1779, he claimed that what children needed to learn "above all" was the "religion of Jesus Christ," and that to learn this would make them "greater and happier than they already are"; on May 2, 1778, he charged his soldiers at Valley Forge that "To the distinguished character of patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian"; and when he resigned his commission as commander-in-chief of the military on June 8, 1783, he reminded the nation that "without a humble imitation" of "the Divine Author of our blessed religion" we "can never hope to be a happy nation." Washington's own adopted daughter declared of Washington that you might as well question his patriotism as to question his Christianity.

Alexander Hamilton was certainly no deist. For example, Hamilton began work with the Rev. James Bayard to form the Christian Constitutional Society to help spread over the world the two things which Hamilton said made America great: (1) Christianity, and (2) a Constitution formed under Christianity. Only Hamilton's death two months later thwarted his plan of starting a missionary society to promote Christian government. And at the time he did face his death in his duel with Aaron Burr, Hamilton met and prayed with the Rev. Mason and Bishop Moore, wherein he reaffirmed to him his readiness to face God should he die, having declared to them "a lively faith in God's mercy through Christ, with a thankful remembrance of the death of Christ." At that time, he also partook of Holy Communion with Bishop Moore.

The reader, as do many others, claimed that Jefferson omitted all miraculous events of Jesus from his "Bible." Rarely do those who make this claim let Jefferson speak for himself. Jefferson own words explain that his intent for that book was not for it to be a "Bible," but rather for it to be a primer for the Indians on the teachings of Christ (which is why Jefferson titled that work, "The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth"). What Jefferson did was to take the "red letter" portions of the New Testament and publish these teachings in order to introduce the Indians to Christian morality. And as President of the United States, Jefferson signed a treaty with the Kaskaskia tribe wherein he provided—at the government's expense—Christian missionaries to the Indians. In fact, Jefferson himself declared, "I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus." While many might question this claim, the fact remains that Jefferson called himself a Christian, not a deist.

James Madison trained for ministry with the Rev. Dr. John Witherspoon, and Madison's writings are replete with declarations of his faith in God and in Christ. In fact, for proof of this, one only need read his letter to Attorney General Bradford wherein Madison laments that public officials are not bold enough about their Christian faith in public and that public officials should be "fervent advocates in the cause of Christ." And while Madison did allude to a "wall of separation," contemporary writers frequently refuse to allow Madison to provide his own definition of that "wall." According to Madison, the purpose of that "wall" was only to prevent Congress from passing a national law to establish a national religion.

None of the Founders mentioned fit the definition of a deist. And as is typical with those who make this claim, they name only a handful of Founders and then generalize the rest. This in itself is a mistake, for there are over two hundred Founders (fifty-five at the Constitutional Convention, ninety who framed the First Amendment and the Bill of Rights, and fifty-six who signed the Declaration) and any generalization of the Founders as deists is completely inaccurate.

The reason that such critics never mention any other Founders is evident. For example, consider what must be explained away if the following signers of the Constitution were to be mentioned: Charles Pinckney and John Langdon—founders of the American Bible Society; James McHenry—founder of the Baltimore Bible Society; Rufus King—helped found a Bible society for Anglicans; Abraham Baldwin—a chaplain in the Revolution and considered the youngest theologian in America; Roger Sherman, William Samuel Johnson, John Dickinson, and Jacob Broom—also theological writers; James Wilson and William Patterson—placed on the Supreme Court by President George Washington, they had prayer over juries in the U. S. Supreme Court room; and the list could go on. And this does not even include the huge number of thoroughly evangelical Christians who signed the Declaration or who helped frame the Bill of Rights.

Any portrayal of any handful of Founders as deists is inaccurate. (If this group had really wanted some irreligious Founders, they should have chosen Henry Dearborne, Charles Lee, or Ethan Allen). Perhaps critics should spend more time reading the writings of the Founders to discover their religious beliefs for themselves rather than making such sweeping accusations which are so easily disproven.

Thank You,
David Barton/WallBuilders
 
Fuck 'em, Zoot

If these guys won't have ya, you're always welcome at my place.

Personally, I think we'll be lucky if all they use the 51% mandate to do is to rewrite the religious history of the country. I'll give them that one if they'll lay off some of the other stuff.

We have to fine down our objections a bit, I think. What part of their agenda will cause the most harm?

Much as I value my friends who are non-Christian and non-hetero, and much as I lament the systematic destruction of the Bill of Rights, I think I have to conclude that their foreign policy causes demonstrably more harm than anything they do domestically. Depleted uranium, culster bombs, torture, the wholesale bombing of defenseless civilians, the unilateral aggression and slaughter, the detruction of health facilities and water systems, land mines, and so forth seem on balance to be causing more death and suffering.

So let them have their fantasies about history. There will always be real history books to set people straight when they've passed the ordeal of the Christianized schools with the TV advertisements in the classrooms which these people seem to want to foist on our children.
 
Originally posted by FinePhilly
This article paints a much different picture:

http://www.wallbuilders.com/resources/search/detail.php?ResourceID=29

(We receive numerous requests from across the country to answer various editorials and letters-to-the-editor. The subject is usually the religious persuasions of the Founding Fathers, and the standard assertion is that they were all deists. The following is but one of many possible replies to such accusations.)

I notice that your newspaper has an ongoing debate concerning the religious nature of the Founding Fathers. .... Perhaps critics should spend more time reading the writings of the Founders to discover their religious beliefs for themselves rather than making such sweeping accusations which are so easily disproven.

Thank You,
David Barton/WallBuilders

Oh, this surely isn't going to be popular.
 
I don't care whether the Founding Fathers were Christians or not.

I'll make up my own mind about God.

If I'm wrong, I'll suffer for it. But I don't believe God is the celestial bully that the True Believers think She is.
 
Um, duh.

The Founding Fathers were Christian. They also believed in the separation of Church and State. They were also real Christian in that they followed the parts that were of Christ instead of the bullshit that the Evangelicals pull out of their asses. These are not contradictory statements.

How is that news to anyone? Hell, even on the west coast where the founding of America was rushed through as fast as possible to get to Manifest Destiny, this was taught. What excuse do you East Coasters have?

And furthermore why is Satan always having to say the blatantly obvious about religion?
 
Re: Fuck 'em, Zoot

cantdog said:
Much as I value my friends who are non-Christian and non-hetero, and much as I lament the systematic destruction of the Bill of Rights, I think I have to conclude that their foreign policy causes demonstrably more harm than anything they do domestically. Depleted uranium, culster bombs, torture, the wholesale bombing of defenseless civilians, the unilateral aggression and slaughter, the detruction of health facilities and water systems, land mines, and so forth seem on balance to be causing more death and suffering.

Don't think of it as their foreign policy, cd. Think of it as practice.
 
Lucifer_Carroll said:
Um, duh.

The Founding Fathers were Christian. They also believed in the separation of Church and State. They were also real Christian in that they followed the parts that were of Christ instead of the bullshit that the Evangelicals pull out of their asses. These are not contradictory statements.


Good catch, Beelzebuddy. Jefferson's statements about the priesthood and clergy in SnP's post are in no way contradicted by the later one where he proclaims himself a Christian who believes in the doctrines and teachings of Christ. He evidently believed as a lot of atheists and agnostics do, that the "red letter" text in the New Testament - the words attributed to Jesus - had enormous value; and that the simplicity of those teachings had been overshadowed and substantially diminished by the churches' insistence upon mystical aspects like the Virgin Birth.

A century earlier, Jefferson would have been stoned to death for claiming the right to say he was a Christian because he embraced the teachings of Christ, the man, while rejecting the divinity of Jesus, the Virgin Birth, the need for salvation, the need for intervention by clergy, and the other tools by which churches wield power.

You can bet that there were some ticked-off fundamentalists who would have loved to reintroduce stoning for Jefferson and others who dissed their world-view. (Let's return to the values of our pre-Founding Fathers, the New England Puritans.)

James Carville, during a debate on the politicization of Christ, pointed out that there is nothing in the words attributed to Jesus himself that indicates he would have shared the views of the religious right.

If you ignore what's said about him and read only what he said, there's little to indicate that Jesus was anti-gay, anti-government, pro-military, or would particularly have cared to have his teachings forcibly accepted by writing them into law. Neither is there anything in Jesus' words to indicate that he was pro-Torquemada and anti-heretic, anti-Gallileo and pro-hemlock, or pro-Creationism and anti-Darwin. The clergy and the people who empower the clergy have always attributed their particular political leanings to Jesus Christ and always will. ("Blessed are the meek" and "Render under Caesar what is Caesar's" don't get much play these days. That Jesus was great for preventing slave uprisings, but he's in disfavor now.)

Carville said, "Read the red-letter text and set aside the other stuff, and you can only conclude that Jesus Christ was a bleeding-heart liberal."

Amen.
 
Last edited:
shereads said:
Has early American history changed very much since 1995, Zack?

If this thread is not your cup of tea, why not have coffee or a soft drink? Or, to paraphrase a previous poster, what sort of creature has found its way inside your posterior orifice?

Edited to add: Where I went to school, we didn't have to learn all this American history stuff to pass civics class! We got credit for good attendance.

:eek:

We didn't have civics. Unless you mean history(I got an A) and they did *not* teach us that the founders weren't christian, or really much of anything about there religious beliefs- although I think that it was sort of *implied* that they were christian. And lot's of people believe that they were.

Oh- and I had 2 kids by 1995. Why do people insist on assuming personal information about me?
 
shereads said:
Good catch, Beelzebuddy. Jefferson's statements about the priesthood and clergy in SnP's post are in no way contradicted by the later one where he proclaims himself a Christian who believes in the doctrines and teachings of Christ. He evidently believed as a lot of atheists and agnostics do, that the "red letter" text in the New Testament - the words attributed to Jesus - had enormous value; and that the simplicity of those teachings had been overshadowed and substantially diminished by the churches' insistence upon mystical aspects like the Virgin Birth.

A century earlier, Jefferson would have been stoned to death for claiming the right to say he was a Christian because he embraced the teachings of Christ, the man, while rejecting the divinity of Jesus, the Virgin Birth, the need for salvation, the need for intervention by clergy, and the other tools by which churches wield power.

You can bet that there were some ticked-off fundamentalists who would have loved to reintroduce stoning for Jefferson and others who dissed their world-view. (Let's return to the values of our pre-Founding Fathers, the New England Puritans.)

James Carville, during a debate on the politicization of Christ, pointed out that there is nothing in the words attributed to Jesus himself that indicates he would have shared the views of the religious right.

If you ignore what's said about him and read only what he said, there's little to indicate that Jesus was anti-gay, anti-government, pro-military, or would particularly have cared to have his teachings forcibly accepted by writing them into law. Neither is there anything in Jesus' words to indicate that he was pro-Torquemada and anti-heretic, anti-Gallileo and pro-hemlock, or pro-Creationism and anti-Darwin. The clergy and the people who empower the clergy have always attributed their particular political leanings to Jesus Christ and always will. ("Blessed are the meek" and "Render under Caesar what is Caesar's" don't get much play these days. That Jesus was great for preventing slave uprisings, but he's in disfavor now.)

Carville said, "Read the red-letter text and set aside the other stuff, and you can only conclude that Jesus Christ was a bleeding-heart liberal."

Amen.


:heart:


Perhaps what the article should have been titled was "The founders were not Fundamentalist Christians."

(I guess it's just to easy to say, "Jeferson was a Christian. I am a Christian. Therefore, Jefferson believed what I believe. Not even aplicable in this day and age.)
 
dr_mabeuse said:
Certainly makes a Jew feel welcome.

---dr.M.

No problem doc. Repent and convert.:devil: Hurry, while there's still time. The clock to the Rapture is counting down, and it's nearing the end.
 
Back
Top