The evidence is slowly accumulating that the Twin Towers were demolished........

M

miles

Guest
The evidence is slowly accumulating that the Twin Towers were demolished by charges set by demolition experts.


Thank you, Donkey Dick, for your latest tidbit of the truth.

Let's hope he never reproduced.
 
Yeah, those big fucking planes that slammed into them were a hell of a charge.
 
This thread needs the following references:

1. The Trilateral Commission

2. The Illuminati

3. Black Helicopters

4. Some dumb ass shit somebody read in the book The Da Vinci Code. Or a book about the book The Da Vinci Code. Or a show about a book that was written about the book The Da Vinci Code.
 
Gringao said:
The evidence is slowly accumulating that Jews are behind Visa. Stay tuned.


The evidence is rapidly accumulating that DonKDick isn't hauling a full load.
 
sticky_keyboard said:
Well, they do control International banking you know.

I've seen the pictures and video clips of them running their bony fingers through their ducats at night. It must be true!
 
On the day there were over a hundred reports of bombs going off in the buildings.
There were bombs, you don't know the truth and you never will.
Want your dick sucked?
 
Gringao said:
I've seen the pictures and video clips of them running their bony fingers through their ducats at night. It must be true!
Let me go look it up in my copy of The Principles of Zion and see if I have that same picture.
 
miles said:
Hollywood. Don't forget Hollywood.

And the media. Cronkite was really Cronkotowitz, you know. Here's a link to prove it: www.batshitclaimsnosensiblepersonwouldbelieve.com/Donkey/Dyck/where'smythorazine.html
 
Gringao said:
And the media. Cronkite was really Cronkotowitz, you know. Here's a link to prove it: www.batshitclaimsnosensiblepersonwouldbelieve.com/Donkey/Dyck/where'smythorazine.html
He appears to have my login blocked.
 
heheheheh :D . . . all the airheads on the one thread :D . . . rattling their cages to attract attention :D . . . heheheheh :D
 
Okay another air head checking in.

Here's a link from a Nova Episode on PBS of one engineers take on what caused the twin towers to collapse. It makes more sense than your theory does Don.

An Engineers Prespective
 
I opposed the Iraq War for my own reasons. But when I see crap like this . . .

Makes me want to say, "Do me a favor . . . don't help my side."
 
miles said:
The evidence is rapidly accumulating that DonKDick isn't hauling a full load.


Stating that the evidence is accumulating is a long way from actually providing any, Miles. You should know better.
 
sweet soft kiss said:
Okay another air head checking in.

Here's a link from a Nova Episode on PBS of one engineers take on what caused the twin towers to collapse. It makes more sense than your theory does Don.

An Engineers Prespective
I saw that Nova episode.

It was really interesting.
 
sweet soft kiss said:
Okay another air head checking in.

Here's a link from a Nova Episode on PBS of one engineers take on what caused the twin towers to collapse. It makes more sense than your theory does Don.

An Engineers Prespective

Very pretty computer generated graphics, but there are some problems with what they provide.

1) We need pictures of the actual trusses, not the computer generated images of possible trusses, also when you get right down to it, the CGI is just a work of fiction. If there weren't as many trusses as proposed in those pretty (but fictional) graphics, there is a real problem with their theory. I noticed that there was no actual building plan on that site, just pretty pics. That makes it even less credible. Were they just guessing? It seems like it.

2) The temperatures assumed in the theory don't match those recorded in the reality, which were no hotter than 500*F. About what it takes to cook a roast lamb over an hour.

3) Here's a recipe for a delicious roast lamb that according to the "Arabs did it" conspiracy theorists is too dangerous to cook in my steel gas-oven;

3 lbs. of your favorite cut of lamb
1 head of cabbage
3 large carrots
3 medium potatoes
1 medium onion
2 long hot peppers
2 T lard or drippings

Place lamb in a heavy roasting dish with a cover. Place carrots, potatoes, and onion around the lamb. Cut the head of cabbage into 6 pieces and also place it around the lamb. Place the hot peppers on top of the lamb. Cover and let steam until done. Do not take the cover off unless necessary. Let roast in a 250 Deg. Celsius oven for 2-1/2 hrs. Serves six.

4) The initial jet fuel was consumed after no more than 10 minutes, the 60,000 thousand or more tons of steel would have taken weeks to superheat to weaken steel, and there are numerous indicators of relative coolness in the Twin Towers on 9-11-1 such as;
- jumpers (not scalded, no more than 200 Fahrenheit)
- survivors who placed emergency calls from the top floors (up till collapse, detailed)
- thermogram of WTC2 facade at 9:18 a.m. (100 Celsius - water boiling point only)
- firemen nearly at collapse time above 70th floor of WTC2: no major fires
- over 400 computer hard drives recovered (Convar, a German company - not over 250 Celsius)
- computers recorded financial transactions seconds before each collapse
- dark smoldering smoke color
- no air flicker
- hardly any fires visible from outside until collapse time (very graphic)
- hundreds of people who managed to flee from the Twin Towers - no major fires
- not one shroud of "weakened steel" is ever presented despite clear crystal structure
- 1.5 million tons of tell-tale debris from the WTC bombing were stolen & destroyed (before any of the official investigators could actually examine the steel)

5) On not a single occassion, before 9-11-2001, and since 9-11-2001, have steel hi-rise buildings ever collapsed due to fire. Yet, we are expected to blithely accept that the rules of physics took a holiday that day and that there is nothing even remotely suspicious that a whole bunch of buildings collapsed on the same day when it has never happened before - or since.

6) That site of yours made an error that reveals that isn't scientifically researched or valid in any way at all;
They state; NOVA: You've pointed out that structural steel loses about half its strength at 1,200°F...

Unfortunately this statement is untrue. Consulting the graph (labelled "High Temperature Steel Properties") given by the Corus Construction Centre it is easy to find that steel loses about 50% of its strength, not at 1200°F, but rather at about 1470°F (c. 800°C)

Neither of these temperatures is achievable, however. Jet fuel is basically kerosene, and kerosene burns at 444°F (229°C) according to the Journal of Australian Fire Investigators.

So, not quite hot enough even to cook my roast lamb properly in an hour.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top