Ishmael
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2001
- Posts
- 84,005
have demonstrated themselves to be the most ignorant of Islam. when confronted with the facts of the "religion of peace" all they can offer up is name calling....xenophobe, racist (this on being the stupidest of all, Islam is not a race), are among the few names they call. In all the years I've been here not once, NOT ONCE, have any of these congenital morons offered up one shred of evidence to support their defense of the religion.
None of them have bothered to read the Qur'an, or the Haddiths, or the theological writings. Their sole source of information on the subject appears to be the talking points perpetuated by an equally ignorant press and certain political leaders. Islam in NOT a religion of peace and never has been. For a period of approx. 2 years Islam did tolerate other religions in their midst, all of which ended in the 12th century. Since that period Islam has been in a perpetual state of war with the 'infidels' and 'barbarians'. The only periods of relative peace have been when they've had their asses handed to them, when they've been totally dominant in a region, or when they needed the help of the 'infidels' and/or 'barbarians' to defeat a common enemy.
So here's a thread where the defenders can come in and intelligently debate their reasoning for their defense of the 'religion of peace.'
Ishmael
PS And BB, keep your rants and name calling to the other threads. I'm quite certain there is going to be enough of that without your contributions.
None of them have bothered to read the Qur'an, or the Haddiths, or the theological writings. Their sole source of information on the subject appears to be the talking points perpetuated by an equally ignorant press and certain political leaders. Islam in NOT a religion of peace and never has been. For a period of approx. 2 years Islam did tolerate other religions in their midst, all of which ended in the 12th century. Since that period Islam has been in a perpetual state of war with the 'infidels' and 'barbarians'. The only periods of relative peace have been when they've had their asses handed to them, when they've been totally dominant in a region, or when they needed the help of the 'infidels' and/or 'barbarians' to defeat a common enemy.
So here's a thread where the defenders can come in and intelligently debate their reasoning for their defense of the 'religion of peace.'
Ishmael
PS And BB, keep your rants and name calling to the other threads. I'm quite certain there is going to be enough of that without your contributions.