The Declaration of sites and weapons from Iraq...

p_p_man

The 'Euro' European
Joined
Feb 18, 2001
Posts
24,253
due to be received tomorrow by the UN is expected to be several thousand pages long and written, for the most part, in Arabic.

For this reason George is expected to reject it as deception...

I bet he wouldn't have any trouble if it was written in Hebrew...

ppman
 
Wait a minute, ppman. This declaration is going to be written by the Iraqis or the weapons inspectors?
 
lavender said:
Wait a minute, ppman. This declaration is going to be written by the Iraqis or the weapons inspectors?

Iraqis.

It's the one they were told to produce under the UN Resolution...

ppman
 
I think p p man is right. The Iraqis stopped making bombs and gas years ago, when we asked them politely.
 
HANS MY SUB BITCH BOY COME ON

NOW *SMACK* DON'T ACT LIKE YOU THINK YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. AGAIN A KNEE THIS TIME IN YOUR BALLS. THEN AS YOU ARE BENT OVER A KICK UP YOUR ASS. DRAGGING YOUR PATHETIC ASS BACK TO YOUR CHAMBER.

*Sorry to intrude but my sub keeps trying to escape the situation at hand. Continue on with the political conversation be it I agree or disagree

Peace,
Tulip
 
official_can_of_whoopass.jpg
 
p_p_man said:
due to be received tomorrow by the UN is expected to be several thousand pages long and written, for the most part, in Arabic.

For this reason George is expected to reject it as deception...

I bet he wouldn't have any trouble if it was written in Hebrew...

ppman


ROFLMAO!

pp spends his days in the pub, chilled out waiting for the Fourth Reich.
So full of hate. What a burden.
 
Re: Re: The Declaration of sites and weapons from Iraq...

pp, I love you. Don't ever leave. You make Hanns look good.
 
HANS BACK TO YOUR CHAMBER

YOU FUCKING BITCH. HITTING YOU HARDER THAN BEFORE. HMM DO I HAVE TO TAKE OUT THE BAMBOO STICK AGAIN.

NICE PICTURE THERE GUNNER!

*Again sorry it is so difficult to find a sub that will comply from time to time.

Peace,
Tulip
 
LOL

I agree that we shouldn't be SOOOOOOOOOOOOO partial to Israel.....but fuckin A, you think WE have problems with terrorists? Sheeeeee-it! They got crazy people over there blowing themselves up every single day! Just to kill a bunch of Israeli's...a lot of them....um....CHILDREN!!!

As for Iraq, Saddam is a fuckin looneybird...though I don't agree that we need to be as arrogant as we are as a nation (come on peeps, we're arrogant, thinkin we can tell the world what to do just b/c we have more bombs and consider ourselves the greatest nation on earth) NOT THAT WE'RE NOT...we are, but do we HAVE to rub it in to every1? But Hussein has used weapons on his own people! He's messed up! I think we should just try and assassinate the motherf__ker, not risk OUR young men and women just to boost Bush's ego! (face it, his daddy didn't get him, so he feels a grudge....come on, DUH!) My brother is thinkin of joinin the marines, and I sure don't want to lose him cuz Bush has a vendetta!

Nuff said :)

skyflame
 
Hanns_Schmidt said:
13,000 pages of "no sir mr bush we have no guns we want peace"


Just blast the rags and get it over with, I can't be fucked with all the political maneouvering just to appease the squeeky voices of the Europeans


11,087
 
Re: LOL

skyflame said:
But Hussein has used weapons on his own people!

skyflame

It wasn't too long ago that American Blacks weren't safe either, and even today I understand they're still considered fair game in certain parts of the country...

ppman
 
Re: Re: LOL

p_p_man said:
It wasn't too long ago that American Blacks weren't safe either, and even today I understand they're still considered fair game in certain parts of the country...

ppman

I think it's a reach to compare the two situations
 
Re: Re: Re: LOL

Gunner Dailey said:
I think it's a reach to compare the two situations

I dunno, two groups of citizens being prosecuted and murdered by their own government appointed servants...

The reach isn't that wide...

ppman
 
Without the benefit of statistics, which even if present would be inaccurate and full of fixed numbers, I would assume the sheer volume of attrocities committed against citizens would be much higher in Iraq that in the United States against the black community.

I'm not saying there aren't injustices all around, but I have yet to see the U.S. Government go in and launch a chemical warefare strike against a civilian population in this country, something that Hussein can't say.

Aside from the fact that he came to power through corruption, initmidation, murdering and other hobbies...he is a boyscout.
 
Re: Re: Re: LOL

Gunner Dailey said:
I think it's a reach to compare the two situations

Not really Gunner . . . in Oz there were unprovoked slaughters of indigenous people in the 1920s on the East Coast and well into the 1930s in the Kimberleys (north Western Australia) and Northern Territory . . . but that was alright . . . the English settlers had followed a policy for genocide, including Aborigine hunts, shoot on sight, diseased blankets, poisoned flour and poisoned wtaerholes since 1788 . . . it was just another unsuccessful attempt to get rid of "a native problem", but without the efficiency achieved by Andrew Jackson in the U$ with the AmerIndians . . . but still the Aborigines survived . . . and it was only about 1975 that many government policies intent on genocide of the indigenous peoples were stopped by legislation.

And you forget the seminal role played by the U$ in establishing Saddam Hussein . . . which went as far as supplying anthrax and botulism innocula, plus the delivery systems for "testing" them, plus munitions and the ubiquitous "military advisers" that have featured so strongly in U$ foreign policy since WWII . . . and were provided until the 1990 Desertstorm campaign . . . WITH THE BLESSING OF THE U$ GOVERNMENT AND BY THE CIA . . . on the admission of the CIA after Desertstorm . . . :)
 
Re: Re: LOL

p_p_man said:
It wasn't too long ago that American Blacks weren't safe either, and even today I understand they're still considered fair game in certain parts of the country...

ppman


You are listening to red again huh?
 
Re: Re: LOL

p_p_man said:
It wasn't too long ago that American Blacks weren't safe either, and even today I understand they're still considered fair game in certain parts of the country...

ppman

That goes down as one of pp's Top Five Incredibly Stupid Posts.

Do tell, Oh Wise one....in which parts of the country are they considered fair game? As you understand it, of course.

Jesus, God. How many brain cells have you killed? The slurred speech is a dead giveaway, BTW.
 
EXCUSE ME POSTERS THAT DO NOT

FLAME ANOTHER... BUT MY LITTLE ITSY BITSY HANSIE BITCH SUB HAS TRIED TO MAKE ANOTHER MOCKERY OF WHAT HE TRULY KNOWS ABOUT THE WORLD. COME HERE SNAPPING MY FINGERS AS HE FOLLOWS. GRABBING HOLD OF HIS ASS SLAPPING IT HARD WITH MY BARE OPEN HAND. THEN I ALLOW MY FINGERNAILS TO DIG DEEP WITHIN HIS FLESH. DRAGGING HIM OFF BY COLLAR TO THE SEWER HE BELONGS IN.

*again this does not mean I agree with the information posted here. Just taking my Bitch Hans back to where he belongs. Continue and have a great night. I know I am!:D

Peace,
Tulip
 
Hanns_Schmidt said:
ppman isn't serious when he compares the brutality of the Iraqi murdering machine, to the treatment of black in modern day America


He's trying to be controversial, failing...but at the same time managing to bait you fucking losers

You call us losers? LMAO! This is your profile:

Total Posts: 6479 (102.80 posts per day

100 + posts per day doesn't sound like you have much of a life more than a foot away from your computer, does it?

One hundred posts per day!

The first step is admitting you have a problem, pissboy.
 
Back
Top