The Death Of The Femocrats

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
67,188
None of these women will survive a campaign against Donald Trump supercharged by four years of unjustified torment by the Democrats themselves:


The sad death of the Femocrats
Democratic voters are getting sick of watching so-called empowered women explain away their failures as bigotry

Amber Athey

Elite women Democrats have faced a brutal reckoning over the past five years. It seemed, as Barack Obama might have put it, that the arc of history was bending in their direction. Half the electorate are female, and feminist identity politics seemed the natural destination for America’s progressive party. It hasn’t worked out that way.

Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton signaled the beginning of the end for the Pantsuit Nation™. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the DC media bubble crowned her successor to Barack Obama’s Democratic party and a shoo-in for the presidency. The American electorate disagreed.

While the party machine may not have learned this lesson from 2016, Democratic voters did. It is no longer enough to be a woman — you also have to be good enough to win.

Female voters in particular have become disillusioned by the novelty of the first female president, according to reporting in the New York Times. The importance of shattering of the ‘glass ceiling’ has been overshadowed by fears that President Donald Trump will coast into reelection, causing many self-avowed feminists to prefer certain male candidates in the Democratic primary.

If this attitude seems divorced from the party’s embrace of third-wave feminism and identity politics, that’s because it is. Party leaders have tried to simultaneously appeal to a small sect of woke progressives while also respecting the party’s tradition of ‘next in line’ politics. The result is a lineup of female candidates who are either uninspiring, unimpressive, or just unelectable.

The rest of the sad but unavoidable truth here:

https://spectator.us/sad-death-femocrats/
 
The Spectator USA primarily covers politics and culture with a right leaning bias in story selection. Headlines and articles usually contain moderately loaded language that favors the right such as this: "A fresh assassination of Brett Kavanaugh’s character" and "Trump will be re-elected because of left-liberal stupidity". Information contained in articles is typically properly sourced to credible media outlets or via direct quotes.

Editorially, The Spectator USA is generally conservative in outlook, favoring the policies of President Trump and supportive of Israel.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-spectator-usa/**famp

:)
 
The Spectator USA primarily covers politics and culture with a right leaning bias in story selection. Headlines and articles usually contain moderately loaded language that favors the right such as this: "A fresh assassination of Brett Kavanaugh’s character" and "Trump will be re-elected because of left-liberal stupidity". Information contained in articles is typically properly sourced to credible media outlets or via direct quotes.

Editorially, The Spectator USA is generally conservative in outlook, favoring the policies of President Trump and supportive of Israel.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-spectator-usa/**famp

:)


Reichguide posting oped pieces as they are factual leads you to believe (know) that he has no fucking clue about our country or our women. ;)
 
The Spectator USA primarily covers politics and culture with a right leaning bias in story selection. Headlines and articles usually contain moderately loaded language that favors the right such as this: "A fresh assassination of Brett Kavanaugh’s character" and "Trump will be re-elected because of left-liberal stupidity". Information contained in articles is typically properly sourced to credible media outlets or via direct quotes.

Editorially, The Spectator USA is generally conservative in outlook, favoring the policies of President Trump and supportive of Israel.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-spectator-usa/**famp

:)

He'd be down to two posts per day without this wingnuttery stuff. And they'd be pics of cans of corn.
 
The Spectator USA primarily covers politics and culture with a right leaning bias in story selection. Headlines and articles usually contain moderately loaded language that favors the right such as this: "A fresh assassination of Brett Kavanaugh’s character" and "Trump will be re-elected because of left-liberal stupidity". Information contained in articles is typically properly sourced to credible media outlets or via direct quotes.

Editorially, The Spectator USA is generally conservative in outlook, favoring the policies of President Trump and supportive of Israel.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-spectator-usa/**famp

:)

I mean honestly that's not too bad. Some hyperbole but still credible. Better than some of the major news orgs.
 
I mean honestly that's not too bad. Some hyperbole but still credible. Better than some of the major news orgs.

I agree.

But, since the other side complains about sources constantly, we'll keep on it. :cool:

(Also, as mentioned above: op ed, presented as facts...)
 
He'd be down to two posts per day without this wingnuttery stuff. And they'd be pics of cans of corn.

Question is, which is his brand du jour for the proper seduction and beguiling of young starving Southeast Asian women into bareback coitus?

Del Monte or Green Giant?

https://d2lnr5mha7bycj.cloudfront.net/product-image/file/large_a138e8a8-b5e2-404f-bea1-776329c84336.png

https://cdn.shoplightspeed.com/shops/621581/files/9477713/800x1024x2/green-giant-green-giant-corn-whole-kernel-niblets.jpg

;)
 
Another reason why Warren will fail::rolleyes:

"My administration will be committed to diversity and inclusion," the U.S. senator from Massachusetts wrote, adding that "on day one" she will "build a Cabinet and senior leadership team that reflects the full diversity of America, including having at least 50% of Cabinet positions filled by women and non binary people."

https://www.theblaze.com/news/elizabeth-warren-cabinet-women-and-non-binary

It's always identity politics with the looney left.
 
Back
Top