The Constitution requires a Senate Trial For Impeachment

[Rightguide]

Will Schumer throw out the Constitution? Article I Section 3, "The Senate shall have the power to try all impeachments."

 

[ll74]

The Senate will do what it's required to do.

Likely a dismissal of charges.

 

[schism666]

poor vetteman. those straws get smaller and further away with each desperate thread.

 

[Rightguide]

The Senate will do what it's required to do.

Likely a dismissal of charges.

Democrats are corrupt. The Republican Senate leader did his duty even though the charges against Trump were phony. Democrats try Republicans but shrink from trying one of their own because of their corruption. They threaten our constitutional order.

 

[ll74]

Democrats are corrupt. The Republican Senate leader did his duty even though the charges against Trump were phony. Democrats try Republicans but shrink from trying one of their own because of their corruption. They threaten our constitutional order.

Your opinion is noted.

Senator Schumer has not indicated that he won't do what he is obligated to do.

Some House Republicans were calling on him to begin the trial before the articles were even received.

 

[Rightguide]

Your opinion is noted.

Senator Schumer has not indicated that he won't do what he is obligated to do.

Some House Republicans were calling on him to begin the trial before the articles were even received.

Schumer's process of dismissing the charges is underway as we speak.

 

[ll74]

Schumer's process of dismissing the charges is underway as we speak.

The rules of the Senate are defined by the Senate.

 

[Rightguide]

The rules of the Senate are defined by the Senate.

They cannot violate the text of the Constitution. We should keep our eyes on Manchin, Sinema, and Fetterman. There has never been an impeachment in our history in which the Senate didn't hold a trial.

 

[ll74]

They cannot violate the text of the Constitution. We should keep our eyes on Manchin, Sinema, and Fetterman. There has never been an impeachment in our history in which the Senate didn't hold a trial.

If the Senate votes to dismiss the charges, then they do.

You'll bitch no matter what happens.

 

[Rightguide]

Y

If the Senate votes to dismiss the charges, then they do.

You'll bitch no matter what happens.

You'll excuse any perfidy of the Democrat Party.

 

[ll74]

Y

You'll excuse any perfidy of the Democrat Party.

The impeachment itself was political theater. I don't care what the Senate does on its way to deciding against removal.

 

[Rightguide]

The impeachment itself was political theater. I don't care what the Senate does on its way to deciding against removal.

The charges are real he did violate the law but Democrats don't give a shit about the law unless it's a chance to dispense of their political enemies. When it exposes them and their President as complicit in illegal acts the law doesn't exist. The Democrat Party is proving itself to be a criminal organization at war with the American people.

 

[KeithD]

Show where the Senate "requires" a full trial for this nonsense. That's just a lie.

 

[ll74]

The charges are real he did violate the law but Democrats don't give a shit about the law unless it's a chance to dispense of their political enemies.

He enforced the policy of the Executive branch....which is his job.

When it exposes them and their President as complicit in illegal acts the law doesn't exist. The Democrat Party is proving itself to be a criminal organization at war with the American people.

Nothing the administration is doing is illegal.

 

[Rightguide]

Show where the Senate "requires" a full trial for this nonsense. That's just a lie.

Article I Section 3 clause 6. In almost 250 years of American history there is no Senate precedent for not holding a trial.

 

[Rightguide]

He enforced the policy of the Executive branch....which is his job.


Nothing the administration is doing is illegal.

Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution:

• This constitutional provision states: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.”
• Essentially, it ensures that each state is safeguarded against invasion by foreign nations, revolutionary forces, drug cartels, and uncontrolled (illegal) immigration1

The Constitution’s “take care” clause specifies that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”

1. 8 U.S.C. § 1325 - Improper Entry by Alien:
   • This statute addresses improper entry into the United States by an alien. It covers several scenarios:
     • Entering at an Improper Time or Place: Any alien who enters or attempts to enter the U.S. at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers violates this provision.
     • Eluding Examination or Inspection: An alien who avoids examination or inspection by immigration officers is also in violation.
     • False or Misleading Representation: Attempting to enter or obtaining entry through willfully false or misleading representation or concealment of material facts is prohibited.
   • Penalties:
     • For the first offense, an alien can be fined under Title 18 or imprisoned for up to 6 months, or both.
     • For subsequent offenses, the penalty can include fines under Title 18 or imprisonment for up to 2 years, or both12.
2. 8 U.S.C. § 1324 - Bringing in and Harboring Certain Aliens:
   • This statute addresses individuals who knowingly bring or attempt to bring an alien to the U.S. without proper authorization.
   • Penalties:
     • Those who engage in such actions can face imprisonment for up to 5 years, fines in accordance with Title 18, or both3.

The President, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Vice President who as the appointed border czar violate the above.

 

[ll74]

Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution:

• This constitutional provision states: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.”
• Essentially, it ensures that each state is safeguarded against invasion by foreign nations, revolutionary forces, drug cartels, and uncontrolled (illegal) immigration1

The Constitution’s “take care” clause specifies that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”

1. 8 U.S.C. § 1325 - Improper Entry by Alien:
   • This statute addresses improper entry into the United States by an alien. It covers several scenarios:
     • Entering at an Improper Time or Place: Any alien who enters or attempts to enter the U.S. at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers violates this provision.
     • Eluding Examination or Inspection: An alien who avoids examination or inspection by immigration officers is also in violation.
     • False or Misleading Representation: Attempting to enter or obtaining entry through willfully false or misleading representation or concealment of material facts is prohibited.
   • Penalties:
     • For the first offense, an alien can be fined under Title 18 or imprisoned for up to 6 months, or both.
     • For subsequent offenses, the penalty can include fines under Title 18 or imprisonment for up to 2 years, or both12.
2. 8 U.S.C. § 1324 - Bringing in and Harboring Certain Aliens:
   • This statute addresses individuals who knowingly bring or attempt to bring an alien to the U.S. without proper authorization.
   • Penalties:
     • Those who engage in such actions can face imprisonment for up to 5 years, fines in accordance with Title 18, or both3.

The President, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Vice President who as the appointed border czar violate the above.

They do not.

The asylum laws are broken and Congress needs to address them. Until then, no President will be able to do shit.

 

[ll74]

First article dismissed as unconstitutional

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

Y

You'll excuse any perfidy of the Democrat Party.

Do you mean the Democratic Party? Because there's no such thing as the "Democrat Party".

 

[icanhelp1]

Will Schumer throw out the Constitution? Article I Section 3, "The Senate shall have the power to try all impeachments."

Voting along party lines. This will wrap up by 7 PM EST. This vote will leave several Democrat senators on the hook come election time. More democrats voting party line rather than in the interest of their constituents. Sad.

 

[ll74]

Voting along party lines. This will wrap up by 7 PM EST. This vote will leave several Democrat senators on the hook come election time. More democrats voting party line rather than in the interest of their constituents. Sad.

They can campaign on the bipartisan effort that Republicans trashed that addresses a multitude of asylum law issues which lead to the overwhelming issue of border crossings.

 

[Bray123]

The Trump Blasphemous Bible has been reviewed; it is supposed to include the Constitution and other documents. Turns out, it only has Amendments 1-10 and leaves out 11-27. Minor details like the abolition of slavery, voting rights of women, rights of Americans to have a President who was actually elected and not a felon. All these parts he wants to delete.

He made sure he kept in the part about only the Senate being able to impeach him, if his followers were educated enough they wouldn't be his followers.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Article I Section 3 clause 6. In almost 250 years of American history there is no Senate precedent for not holding a trial.

No precedent for filing for impeachment without evidence either. Brave new world of performative theater.

 

[ll74]

Second article dismissed by the Senate 51-49.

 

[SmokingFap]

Second article dismissed by the Senate 51-49.

Waaaaahhhh!!! The majority got its way!!!