The Afrikaner Rants ....

jaF0

Watcher
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Posts
38,536

Musk defends 'Dilbert' creator, says media is 'racist against whites'

www.msn.com.ico
The Washington Post|2 hours ago
Twitter and Tesla chief Elon Musk defended Scott Adams, the under-fire creator of "Dilbert," in a series of tweets Sunday morning, blasting media organizations for dropping his comic strip after ...
 
I live about 60km south of his parents (father). In the media here he (father musk) comes across as a right wing conspiracy nut. So the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
 
Musk is right
Every single racist here agrees with dildobert....they hide from blacks because they hate blacks

If he gets dropped from newspapers, it's because he said the quiet part out loud....and he shouldn't have.

If you're going to be a racist, be one without publicly being one..or prepare to be treated like a racist.
 
Because they're brain-damaged by Marxist wokeism. Must is right. The media and the Biden administration is at war with the majority of Americans.
What the fuck is “Marxist wokeism?” Please explain yourself.
 
What the fuck is “Marxist wokeism?” Please explain yourself.
In Marxist terms, being woke would be rejecting false consciousness and becoming aware of the invisible strictures of the capitalist class structure.

When you're woke in the modern sense, you've had a similar realization about institutional white supremacy.

Unfortunately, Marx--as a 19th-century European white male--was unaware of his own false consciousness regarding race and gender. But his ideas still have currency.
 
The 'w' word is not a word. It's pure nonsense and those who use it clearly have no sense.
 
Because they're brain-damaged by Marxist wokeism. Must is right. The media and the Biden administration is at war with the majority of Americans.
Beleive me, regular Americans wisht hey were but they are not. They are still highly, highly bigotted and it shows on so many fronts. You are not the majority of Americans, what you are is noisy.
 
Yeah, saying that white people should get the hell away from black people because of some poll's results has to be one of the dumbest and most racist public statements made by a media figure so far this year.

And, Elon Musk and Lit's own RightGuard jumped right on board with that statement. Sounds like snailspace was also triggered by the poll.

Oh well, media figures crash and burn frequently due to their personality disorders. Adams probably spends a lot of time on his own as a cartoonist, and then got even more off kilter during the pandemic.

Buh-bye, Dildo!
 
The 47% in the Rasmussen poll have issues.
Racism is when you generalize about members of a racial background based upon a capricious data foundation.

Who the fuck is dumb enough to publicly support the recommendation to run away from black people in general based on the results of a Rasmussen poll? I'll tell you who, it's people who are looking for an excuse to scapegoat and suppress that racial group, like you, RightGuard, Musk, and this cartoonist Adams.

And then, there is this whole other school of racism on Lit led by John Engelman, who is hell-bent on "proving" which racial lines are "superior" to others. Foolish attempts at establishing racial, ethnic, political, or religious "superiority" are the historical source of so much conflict and bloodshed.

It's all just different forms of hate that ultimately lead to violence.
 
Racism is when you generalize about members of a racial background based upon a capricious data foundation.

Who the fuck is dumb enough to publicly support the recommendation to run away from black people in general based on the results of a Rasmussen poll? I'll tell you who, it's people who are looking for an excuse to scapegoat and suppress that racial group, like you, RightGuard, Musk, and this cartoonist Adams.

And then, there is this whole other school of racism on Lit led by John Engelman, who is hell-bent on "proving" which racial lines are "superior" to others. Foolish attempts at establishing racial, ethnic, political, or religious "superiority" are the historical source of so much conflict and bloodshed.

It's all just different forms of hate that ultimately lead to violence.
My comment was in reference to the poll, not Adams. People who think it’s not ok to be white, or aren’t sure, have issues. It’s ok to be any race. Period.
 
My comment was in reference to the poll, not Adams. People who think it’s not ok to be white, or aren’t sure, have issues. It’s ok to be any race. Period.
First of all, you are trying to make your allegedly non-racist comment on a thread that is about Adams and about another fool who came to the defense of Adams for publicly making a stupid and racist statement.

Secondly, you demonstrate no insight into the fallibility of this poll and of polls in general. You imply that 47% of the respondents have issues with "being white". That's not true. 26% of those black respondents disagreed with a poll statement, as it was articulated in the poll, and 21% were not sure if they agreed with the statement, as it was articulated in the poll. Obviously there is a lot of American history involved the enslavement and suppression of black people, so it is understandable there will be questions about what exactly that particular poll question means to black people.

Get over it. It's a poll question, not a demonstration of any validity to Adams' racist conclusion that "If nearly half of all Blacks are not okay with White people … that’s a hate group".

You leaped at the same "nearly half" conclusion as Adams, and you did it on the thread that is about someone who stupidly labeled an entire racial line as a "hate group" that needs to be shunned.

Great timing.
 
First of all, you are trying to make your allegedly non-racist comment on a thread that is about Adams and about another fool who came to the defense of Adams for publicly making a stupid and racist statement.

Secondly, you demonstrate no insight into the fallibility of this poll and of polls in general. You imply that 47% of the respondents have issues with "being white". That's not true. 26% of those black respondents disagreed with a poll statement, as it was articulated in the poll, and 21% were not sure if they agreed with the statement, as it was articulated in the poll. Obviously there is a lot of American history involved the enslavement and suppression of black people, so it is understandable there will be questions about what exactly that particular poll question means to black people.

Get over it. It's a poll question, not a demonstration of any validity to Adams' racist conclusion that "If nearly half of all Blacks are not okay with White people … that’s a hate group".

You leaped at the same "nearly half" conclusion as Adams, and you did it on the thread that is about someone who stupidly labeled an entire racial line as a "hate group" that needs to be shunned.

Great timing.
Correct. If one disagrees with the statement “it’s ok to be white,” they have issues. If one is not sure they agree with the statement, they have issues. It is ok to be any race.
 
Left ... Dilbert.


ap23056731159869-09dcfd048de152021705076459bbb8237906a844-s1100-c50.jpg




Right ... Dillhole.

Dilbert wears his glasses on the outside to his white hood, whereas Dillhole prefers the more country club style of the white supremacists who demonstrated and incited violence at Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017.
 
Correct. If one disagrees with the statement “it’s ok to be white,” they have issues. If one is not sure they agree with the statement, they have issues. It is ok to be any race.
The phrase "It's okay to be white" is a common white supremacist meme. It's like Pepe the frog or flashing the WP hand sign. If you don't know that context it seems innocuous. It's a dog whistle--a way for racists to share their identity online in front of the normies.
 
Back
Top