Teen faces 8 years in jail for prank

[MarlowBunny]

An actual prank where a teen places a blow-up doll in the girls locker room: Suspended from school. Can't attend graduation. Charged by police. Faces 8 years in prison.
http://www.wthr.com/story/14828400/rushville-teen-facing-felony-charges-over-prank


Boy assaulted, stripped, humiliated, and video posted on YouTube: Police call it a prank and no crime was committed.

 

[Stella_Omega]

You had to top post this? It couldn't have been part of the original thread?

Start those petitions, asshole! Posting here is the ultimate in useless whining.

 

[Boxlicker101]

You had to top post this? It couldn't have been part of the original thread?

Start those petitions, asshole! Posting here is the ultimate in useless whining.

What original thread? This hasn't been mentioned before, unless you are referring to the one about the 11 year old boy being assaulted by the older girls. The two threads have little in common, just demonstrating how the law is an ass.

 

[Stella_Omega]

What original thread? This hasn't been mentioned before, unless you are referring to the one about the 11 year old boy being assaulted by the older girls. The two threads have little in common, just demonstrating how the law is an ass.

that's the one, and this thread is a continuation of that one, by ops words in the very first post here;

Boy assaulted, stripped, humiliated, and video posted on YouTube: Police call it a prank and no crime was committed.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101
What original thread? This hasn't been mentioned before, unless you are referring to the one about the 11 year old boy being assaulted by the older girls. The two threads have little in common, just demonstrating how the law is an ass.

that's the one, and this thread is a continuation of that one, by ops words in the very first post here;

Quote:
Boy assaulted, stripped, humiliated, and video posted on YouTube: Police call it a prank and no crime was committed.

The two threads have nothing in common, except for the reference to a prank and, even there, they are the opposite of each other. In this one, a prank is described as a serious crime and in the other one a serious crime - sexual assault - is described as a prank.

This was not a bomb hoax, which would be tricking authorities into believing a bomb might be set to go off when there is no bomb. This was some Chicken Little pushing the panic button when nothing happened or would have happened.

 

[Stella_Omega]

*laughing*

Okay, Box. Whatever.

 

[sr71plt]

This reference in MarlowBunny's OP takes you right back to MarlowBunny's other thread (as Stella posted) and thus is just an extension of the earlier thread:

"Boy assaulted, stripped, humiliated, and video posted on YouTube: Police call it a prank and no crime was committed."

Any chance in this lifetime that you're going to understand that, Box?

 

[Stella_Omega]

Any chance in this lifetime that you're going to understand that, Box?

No fair asking trick questions!

 

[Boxlicker101]

This reference in MarlowBunny's OP takes you right back to MarlowBunny's other thread (as Stella posted) and thus is just an extension of the earlier thread:

"Boy assaulted, stripped, humiliated, and video posted on YouTube: Police call it a prank and no crime was committed."

Any chance in this lifetime that you're going to understand that, Box?

Oh, I understand that. I'm just disagreeing with you. As I said, there is a comparison made, but this thread can stand on its own, as can the other one.

 

[sr71plt]

Oh, I understand that. I'm just disagreeing with you. As I said, there is a comparison made, but this thread can stand on its own, as can the other one.

Earth to Box. You're not disagreeing with me on anything. All I pointed out was your obvious failure to understand (despite your statement now that you did understand). You claimed there was no original connecting thread. I haven't commented on the thread topic at all. (I did comment on the other thread, but as you claim the threads have no relationship, I haven't commented on the issue of this thread at all. )

And this, gang, has been yet another "not the brightest bulb in the chandelier" moment (actually several moments) brought to you by Boxlicker.