Recidiva
Harastal
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Posts
- 89,726
Here it is:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xrlzus_taboo-alcoholics-shelter_shortfilms
I have to admit my head exploded upon seeing this. My social math won't add up. I had to pause and announce..."THIS...is why we need Republicans. If Republicans didn't exist, these people would rule the world."
The premise and stated goal of this shelter in Seattle is to get alcoholics off the streets, reducing emergency room trips and drunk tank attendance. According to the clip, providing homeless alcoholics with a place to live and a...daily...alcohol...allowance...(cringe, groan) on taxpayer funds, saves the city millions of dollars a year in emergency care.
I might accept that this is a viable treatment method if you consider alcoholism terminal and this is a compassionate hospice. But I don't, really. I can see that it works occasionally, but working occasionally isn't good enough to adopt this mindset or treatment program more widely.
I can't, however, deal with the basic premise that you can provide public assistance with no goal of eventually improving someone's life and getting them off public assistance.
It's the taxpayer part of this that makes me rebel. If this were only a charity I'd be less queasy. If it were voluntary and charitable, sure. However, it's the government's go-to solution. Eeewwww...
This, however, seems like government-subsidized acceptance of alcoholism as an incurable disease, thus allowing them to divert public funds to save money while using that premise to let people stay in a holding pattern until they die from it.
Mind...boggling...
Your thoughts?
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xrlzus_taboo-alcoholics-shelter_shortfilms
I have to admit my head exploded upon seeing this. My social math won't add up. I had to pause and announce..."THIS...is why we need Republicans. If Republicans didn't exist, these people would rule the world."
The premise and stated goal of this shelter in Seattle is to get alcoholics off the streets, reducing emergency room trips and drunk tank attendance. According to the clip, providing homeless alcoholics with a place to live and a...daily...alcohol...allowance...(cringe, groan) on taxpayer funds, saves the city millions of dollars a year in emergency care.
I might accept that this is a viable treatment method if you consider alcoholism terminal and this is a compassionate hospice. But I don't, really. I can see that it works occasionally, but working occasionally isn't good enough to adopt this mindset or treatment program more widely.
I can't, however, deal with the basic premise that you can provide public assistance with no goal of eventually improving someone's life and getting them off public assistance.
It's the taxpayer part of this that makes me rebel. If this were only a charity I'd be less queasy. If it were voluntary and charitable, sure. However, it's the government's go-to solution. Eeewwww...
This, however, seems like government-subsidized acceptance of alcoholism as an incurable disease, thus allowing them to divert public funds to save money while using that premise to let people stay in a holding pattern until they die from it.
Mind...boggling...
Your thoughts?