Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
BiBunny said:It's scary how much that sounds like something I'd write.
It's scary how unlike anything I'd write that sounds though. But we seem to be tapped into a wavelength.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BiBunny said:It's scary how much that sounds like something I'd write.
Netzach said:I think it's a position preference. Or maybe you're a T/b switch but not a power switch.
Blkhearted_Rube said:Possibly - for some reason I like to be "ridden" - ride 'em cowgirl!
Netzach said:Oh, well, yeah. I've actually had girls do that with my strap on. I like to see boobs bounce and little butches get really embarrassed at how into it they are.
This is interesting to me, as I see myself as very much the opposite. The experience of Topping brings with it extreme emotional intensity for me, always. Even when it doesn't work out quite as planned (which happened much more in my very early days). I fall in love a little with everyone I Top. I like bottoming for the sensation - OK, I am indeed a pain slut! Yet, while I am not only in it for myself - I greatly enjoy giving my Top pleasure, it doesn't have the same emotional intensity for me.BiBunny said:That may have something to do with it. I don't know. I feel like I give a lot more of myself when I bottom than when I Top most of the time. I would love for Topping to become as intense of an experience as bottoming for me, but that probably requires something more than I've gotten from the bottoms I've had. I love B. to death, and I love to Top him, but he's really a shitty sub.![]()
I am not sure that I see this as switching - more perhaps, learning one's craft or supporting a cause through "acting?" I am actually suspicious of PYLs who will never "submit" their bodies to the implements they use in play - I don't understand how they can truly gage the sensations they give others. But I don't see that act as being at all "submissive" and therefore "switchy." I do think that there are those who are 100% sub or dom, just as I think there are those who are truly 0's (100% hetero) and 6's (100% homo) on the old Kinsey scale, although I also think that the 100%-ers are fewer than we might presume.BiBunny said:I think there's a little switch in everyone. It just takes more for it to come out in some people than in others. Even Geoff says he bottoms to learn about new sensations and for charity. Doesn't mean he enjoys it, but there are certain situations in which he thinks it's prudent. That's my take on things.
Neonneonflux said:This is interesting to me, as I see myself as very much the opposite. The experience of Topping brings with it extreme emotional intensity for me, always. Even when it doesn't work out quite as planned (which happened much more in my very early days). I fall in love a little with everyone I Top. I like bottoming for the sensation - OK, I am indeed a pain slut! Yet, while I am not only in it for myself - I greatly enjoy giving my Top pleasure, it doesn't have the same emotional intensity for me.
I have deeply submitted only once, and the aftermath was extremely difficult for me - much more than the subdrop which followed the endorphin drop, I felt like I'd "shattered" and had to struggle to put the pieces back together... Complete opposite of what I feel when I Top - like I've found a piece of myself. And I have to acknowledge that it is more than just Topping, there is a strong element for me of emotional dominance, as well as physical/sexual, if that makes sense?
I DO sometimes submit to ~D, but not to the same degree, and I've noticed that, while it isn't emotionally devastating, afterwards I experience a driving desire not only to Top, but to exercise my sadism (for anyone who knows our relationship, clearly not on him, lol).
Strangely, I do like the idea of service submission - for instance, serving at a D/s themed party, but there is a power and control in that type of service, even when the primary motivation is to anticipate desires and to please, that one gives up when submitting within the context of a full power exchange.
I am not sure that I see this as switching - more perhaps, learning one's craft or supporting a cause through "acting?" I am actually suspicious of PYLs who will never "submit" their bodies to the implements they use in play - I don't understand how they can truly gage the sensations they give others. But I don't see that act as being at all "submissive" and therefore "switchy." I do think that there are those who are 100% sub or dom, just as I think there are those who are truly 0's (100% hetero) and 6's (100% homo) on the old Kinsey scale, although I also think that the 100%-ers are fewer than we might presume.
QUESTION: Do you think there is any connection between being switch and being bi or gender-queer (vs. lesbian or gay)?
OK, think that's it for now. I really like this thread, and I also like the name, LOL.
Neon
I SWITCH HIT!
Netzach said:Oh, well, yeah. I've actually had girls do that with my strap on. I like to see boobs bounce and little butches get really embarrassed at how into it they are.
Thinking more about this, I suspect it does have to do somewhat with wiring, and that it may indeed be connected to the gender-fluidity that is an inherent part of who we are - I have a lot of ties to the trans communities here and I've often felt that bi and trans folk (of all varieties, including to some extent CDs) have much more in common than either of us do with either straight or 6-on-Kinsey-scale-gay folk. I don't know if this is true for everyone, but as with all aspects of my sexuality, I do experience my kink as an extension of the gender fluiditity and complexity that is part and parcel of my bisexuality. I think this makes sense??? *chuckle*BiBunny said:Thank you for your input, Ms. Neon. You know I always love to hear what you have to say.
As far as your question about being a switch and being bi or gender-queer, I think you may be onto something. I don't know many switches who are 100% heterosexual or 100% homosexual. The ones that are on the hetero end of the scale may only be interested in the same sex as play partners, as opposed to being capable of having romantic relationships with them. Even of the switch men who are straight, you usually find that they're into cross-dressing, which, while not exactly a bisexual thing, seems to venture into territory beyond what most vanilla people would consider "normal."![]()
I'm not sure what the connection is, but I think there may very well be one. I could make it a little more complicated, too, and point out that most of the poly-capable people I know are bisexual switches. Does it all come together in our wiring somehow, I wonder?![]()
Neon
Pansexual? (Definition - I usually think of this term being specific to queer folk...) Are you then relating it to queerness? Somehow, I suspect that there's some link between having more tolerance for gender-variance (certainly coming out in this culture requires questioning traditional roles) and being able to switch, but... Also, while one might find some switches that are gay or lesbian, would one find more bi folks who are switch? Just wondering if being more fluid in one's sexual attractions might also lead to more fluidity in terms of kink-related roles. JM once posited that the switches he's known were more into the sensation of S/m play versus the D/s aspects. And then where to trans folk (among whom 50% are bi) fit into the equation???Netzach said:I don't know if it's always gonna line up - hung with enough lesbians with zero to ho hum interest in men and gay men with no interest in women who were very avid switches to make me think it's not necessarily so. Enough that I would even venture that it's not predominant - it does point to a split in queer versus pansexual leather maybe.
NeonRegarding sensation play, I am an "egalitarian-minded sadist" when it comes to gender - it definitely depends then upon the individual. I also enjoy emotional sadism of the "increase anxiety" and predicament bondage type equally with both genders. (I have a huge Imp inside me, LOL.)BiBunny said:Bumpage.
For those of you who Top both genders, do you ever find that you tend to be a lot harder on one gender than the other, or does it depend on the person? I'm talking to a sub friend of mine, and it made me realize that while I like to hurt girls, I really just like to make boys my pets. I'm not sure why this is. Maybe the innate knowledge that most women are tougher than men, maybe?![]()
NeonBiBunny said:Bumpage.
For those of you who Top both genders, do you ever find that you tend to be a lot harder on one gender than the other, or does it depend on the person? I'm talking to a sub friend of mine, and it made me realize that while I like to hurt girls, I really just like to make boys my pets. I'm not sure why this is. Maybe the innate knowledge that most women are tougher than men, maybe?![]()
Evil_Geoff said:It really depends on who I'm playing with.
I've known guys who are major mondo pain pigs...
neonflux said:Pansexual? (Definition - I usually think of this term being specific to queer folk...) Are you then relating it to queerness? Somehow, I suspect that there's some link between having more tolerance for gender-variance (certainly coming out in this culture requires questioning traditional roles) and being able to switch, but... Also, while one might find some switches that are gay or lesbian, would one find more bi folks who are switch? Just wondering if being more fluid in one's sexual attractions might also lead to more fluidity in terms of kink-related roles. JM once posited that the switches he's known were more into the sensation of S/m play versus the D/s aspects. And then where to trans folk (among whom 50% are bi) fit into the equation???Neon
Netzach said:.... But then, look at me, I'm going to notice the sub bottom half more.
