Sussman not guilty. LMFAO
- Thread starter icanhelp1
- Start date
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 17,326
Sussman found *not guilty* by a jury of Clinton’s peers. Can you say *two tier justice system* LMFAO
siobhancan99
The Divine
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2020
- Posts
- 4,136
Clinton Jury? Why because there was a donor? They weren't HUNG. That might indicate some shenanigans. The problem here is that notes taken by an FBI agent indicated that while he might have said something PRIOR to the meeting about not having a client, during the meeting he did say that he was there on behalf of the campaign. Sorry, he just didn't lie. That's it.
Wrong Element
Sentient Onion
- Joined
- May 5, 2002
- Posts
- 24,909
Durhamfail
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 50,307
Because they need to blame someone else.
"Mr. Durham expressed disappointment in the verdict but said he respected the decision by the jury, which deliberated for about six hours." Since he was there in the courtroom as the case was presented, and icanhelp1 wasn't, I will go with Durham. The whole case was dumb; the FBI was already investigating before Sussman spoke with them.
There's nothing illegal about doing opposition research and if you come on something that might be illegal, informing the relevant authorities. What they do with that is up to them.
There's nothing illegal about doing opposition research and if you come on something that might be illegal, informing the relevant authorities. What they do with that is up to them.
Wrong Element
Sentient Onion
- Joined
- May 5, 2002
- Posts
- 24,909
He's not going to do it, but it's long past time for the Attorney General to derail this gravy train.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 61,871
Overwhelming evidence of guilt but a conflicted Democrat jury protected it's own. Two or three Jurors were Clinton donors, the wife of the judge representing Lisa Page, another Juror's daughter on the same sports team as Sussman's daughter. What are the odds of this kind of a nexus in a city wide Jury trial. We saw this coming but hoped for justice to prevail. Meanwhile another Hillary Clinton conspirator goes free.
It's DC. The jury pool is limited. Durham did have the chance to object to any prospective juror at voir dire.
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 50,307
Yes, you can't admit there wasn't a case.
phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
I saw it coming from a long way off.
Do you know how jurors are chosen? If unfavorable choices are made, it’s the lawyer’s fault.
Remember when all of those Trump associates-Manafort, Gates, Flynn, Papadopoulos, Roger Stone, that Dutch lawyer all either pled guilty or were convicted of lying to investigators, some of you MAGA types said that wasn't a real crime, just a peripheral act pursued by overzealous prosecutors. Now some one is ACQUITTED-by a jury that heard all the facts and voted UNANIMOUSLY- and it's the crime of the century.
Look, the simple truth is that Trump has been a crook his whole life. His businesses have been scams. You can like his policies (I'm not sure he actually had any that weren't spoon-fed to him) and defend him on those grounds, but pretending he's not crooked and worthy of being investigated is simply ridiculous. And nothing Hillary did or could do negates that.
Now, there's a pretty good chance that Terump will be indicted in Georgia for his call to Raffensberger. And I promise you all, if the case goes to trial and he's acquitted, I will accept the jury's verdict. Because I'm not a poor loser excuse maker like some of you.
Look, the simple truth is that Trump has been a crook his whole life. His businesses have been scams. You can like his policies (I'm not sure he actually had any that weren't spoon-fed to him) and defend him on those grounds, but pretending he's not crooked and worthy of being investigated is simply ridiculous. And nothing Hillary did or could do negates that.
Now, there's a pretty good chance that Terump will be indicted in Georgia for his call to Raffensberger. And I promise you all, if the case goes to trial and he's acquitted, I will accept the jury's verdict. Because I'm not a poor loser excuse maker like some of you.
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 17,326
SULLIVAN=ANTI-TRUMP/ FLYNN HUNG BY THE BALLS
COOPER = PRO-CLINTON/OBAMA APPOINTEE/ SUSSMAN WALKS
Sussman's as innocent as OJ Simpson
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 50,307
All caps and everything...nifty triggering.
Durham had no case. The jury unanimously told him that.
Durham also had a chance to object to the judge.
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 17,326
Cooper would not allow a good portion of the evidence and the jury was a social gathering for weeping Clinton sore losers. We know the truth.
As far as objecting to jury selection, well, when 90% of DC inhabitants are pro Clinton, they'd still be in the process of selecting jurors if they could. The trial should have been moved to a different venue, obviously a more neutral demographic.
Flynn pled guilty. He could have gone to trial. He's even dumber than you...
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 50,307
Why was the evidence not allowed?
We do know the truth. The truth is that Trump has been a crook since childhood. Even you, dumb as you are, know that...
Change of Venue motions are only allowed by the defense under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_21 Tough luck. You really can't help...
Last edited:
Wrong Element
Sentient Onion
- Joined
- May 5, 2002
- Posts
- 24,909
It's a minor miracle Flynn isn't spending the rest of his life in prison, and still they're bitching.
Similar threads
