BabyBoomer50s
Capitalist
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2018
- Posts
- 12,031
Another surprise! Journalist Alex Bersenson dug this up over the weekend. Link to the paper is below.
“On Friday, the journal Andrology published a peer-reviewed paper showing large decreases in sperm counts among men after the second dose of Pfizer’s mRNA Covid jab.
“Based on counts from men who donated sperm to three fertility clinics in Israel, this finding is devastating - medically and politically.
“It cuts to the heart of the hottest button question of all about the mRNA shots, whether they have hidden fertility risks. That issue has simmered since early 2021, following my reporting that data showed the shots had caused excess miscarriages in rats - and other reports showing that measurable amounts of vaccine reached the ovaries and testes in tests in rats.
“Ever since, media “fact-checkers” and public health authorities have dismissed and mocked the concerns and anyone who raises them.
“Now - after a half-billion men have received mRNA shots - the skeptics appear to be right. Again. The Israeli paper offers hard evidence that the vaccines may present a systemic risk to men’s sperm counts. What was a conspiracy theory is now just a theory. AGAIN.
“The paper raises questions about mechanism of action that must be answered immediately. And on top of the myocarditis risk, the finding is more evidence that encouraging - much less forcing - men under 40 to take the mRNA vaccines was a catastrophic mistake.
“However, the authors qualified their findings by reporting that after five months, sperm levels recovered. Thus the decreases were only temporary, they wrote.
“Put aside the fact that a five-month decrease hardly qualifies as temporary for someone trying to start a family - or compared to a “vaccine” that loses effectiveness against Omicron within weeks or months.
“As other writers have pointed out, the actual data in the paper do not really support the argument that sperm levels returned to normal after five months. In fact, by some measures, levels continued to decline.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13209
“On Friday, the journal Andrology published a peer-reviewed paper showing large decreases in sperm counts among men after the second dose of Pfizer’s mRNA Covid jab.
“Based on counts from men who donated sperm to three fertility clinics in Israel, this finding is devastating - medically and politically.
“It cuts to the heart of the hottest button question of all about the mRNA shots, whether they have hidden fertility risks. That issue has simmered since early 2021, following my reporting that data showed the shots had caused excess miscarriages in rats - and other reports showing that measurable amounts of vaccine reached the ovaries and testes in tests in rats.
“Ever since, media “fact-checkers” and public health authorities have dismissed and mocked the concerns and anyone who raises them.
“Now - after a half-billion men have received mRNA shots - the skeptics appear to be right. Again. The Israeli paper offers hard evidence that the vaccines may present a systemic risk to men’s sperm counts. What was a conspiracy theory is now just a theory. AGAIN.
“The paper raises questions about mechanism of action that must be answered immediately. And on top of the myocarditis risk, the finding is more evidence that encouraging - much less forcing - men under 40 to take the mRNA vaccines was a catastrophic mistake.
“However, the authors qualified their findings by reporting that after five months, sperm levels recovered. Thus the decreases were only temporary, they wrote.
“Put aside the fact that a five-month decrease hardly qualifies as temporary for someone trying to start a family - or compared to a “vaccine” that loses effectiveness against Omicron within weeks or months.
“As other writers have pointed out, the actual data in the paper do not really support the argument that sperm levels returned to normal after five months. In fact, by some measures, levels continued to decline.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13209