Supreme Court Justice Aileen Cannon

[RobDownSouth]

"Judge" Aileen Cannon ruled in Trump's favor on some procedural motion this morning and an ecstatic Trump made it official:
Elect him in 2024 and Aileen Cannon will be his next nominee to the Supreme Court.

Back in the good old days (pre-2016) this would have been considered prima facie evidence of bribery.

 

[CenSore]

good choice for SCOTUS

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Solomon was the Wise Judge. Not that facts matter . . . .

 

[Bray123]

Trump never lost an election; they were all stollen, rigged, corrupt.

In 2000 he ran as Reform Party Candidate, in 2011 he ran for GOP nomination, in 2020 he was thrown out. All stollen.

 

[AchtungNight]

I once remember Solomon threatening to bisect a baby. Not very wise at first glance…

 

[butters]

"Judge" Aileen Cannon ruled in Trump's favor on some procedural motion this morning and an ecstatic Trump made it official:
Elect him in 2024 and Aileen Cannon will be his next nominee to the Supreme Court.

Back in the good old days (pre-2016) this would have been considered prima facie evidence of bribery.

does that relate to her allowing trump to view whatever documents he likes without restrictions or this?

Cannon, who was appointed by Trump in 2020, questioned whether the case could remain in line with the schedule she set in July after the two sides faced issues with handling sensitive case documents.

"I'm just having a hard time seeing how realistically this work can be accomplished in this compressed period, given the realities that we're facing," Cannon said at a hearing on Wednesday.

Cannon said she would make "reasonable" changes to parts of the schedule including deadlines for pretrial filings but did not issue a ruling on the final date, saying she would provide the new timeline "as soon as possible."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=beb902dcede9451d9bf55a338b8d28fd&ei=139

 

[RobDownSouth]

Well, folks, I got snookered. The Trump post I posted above was a fake.
kudos to whoever created it though...they got Trump's mindset perfectly.

 

[butters]

Well, folks, I got snookered. The Trump post I posted above was a fake.
kudos to whoever created it though...they got Trump's mindset perfectly.

what does it say about how trump comports himself that posts like that are so easily believed?

 

[butters]

In a motion Wednesday night, prosecutors in Smith's office had asked Cannon to schedule a deadline for the defense to file a notice under Section 5 of the Classified Information Procedures Act, or CIPA which "enables the government to know what classified information the defense seeks to disclose at trial." Trump and his co-defendants opposed the motion, Smith's prosecutors said.

In a paperless order on Thursday, issued before the co-defendants made any court filing explaining their opposition, Cannon ruled against prosecutors.

"CIPA Section 5 deadlines, and all other pre-trial deadlines not included in the first batch of pre-trial deadlines contained in the Court's revised schedule...will be set following the March 1, 2024, scheduling conference," Cannon wrote in the order.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...p&cvid=cccd0ee436c84e958223cdeeb8f048a2&ei=68

 

[Lazaran]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...p&cvid=cccd0ee436c84e958223cdeeb8f048a2&ei=68

Good old Aileen just keeps serving up that top tier of the "two tier" justice system to her benefactor.

That compromised hack should be removed from the case. - Of course, that would cause a further delay in the trial, which may explain why she’s being so transparently biased. - It’s quite possible she’s purposefully trying to get removed.

JFC

SAD!!!

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Doubtful this trial will happen in May. Could start after the convention, or possibly not at all.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/11/22/aileen-cannon-trump-trial-slow-00128391

 

[Bray123]

She's filibustering the case until such time as he thinks he could pardon himself.

There several problems with that though;
Other judges might step into the vacant timetable with their cases.
Trump may not win the election (correction, he will win all the votes but the election will be stollen from him).
Self-pardon is not even possible because there's an impeachment process. If it were possible there could never be an impeachment.

 

[Lazaran]

Doubtful this trial will happen in May. Could start after the convention, or possibly not at all.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/11/22/aileen-cannon-trump-trial-slow-00128391

^
Just creamed their Depends.



BabyBoobs



Also:

JFC

SAD!!!

 

[butters]

finally cannon rules to protect witnesses

Special counsel Jack Smith has spent months trying to convince Cannon to keep under seal the names of FBI agents, Secret Service agents, and other potential witnesses in the case, which charges Trump with mishandling classified documents and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them from Mar-a-Lago, his Florida home and private club.

Initially, Cannon ruled against Smith, but on Tuesday she relented, saying she would agree to keeping the names and identifying information under seal. It was not a total victory for Smith, however, because the judge also ruled that the substance of the witness statements can be made public in filings, so long as the material did not identify the witnesses or other people who are mentioned.

of course, there's a 'for now' caveat, and she made a song and dance about Special Prosecutor Smith's failings (in her mind), and yet she agreed to the move. Purely all about the stalling.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a...1&cvid=9672940e87434ebeba5aed4c094f797a&ei=65

 

[goldytheGoldfish]

 

[John Doe]

Well, folks, I got snookered. The Trump post I posted above was a fake.
kudos to whoever created it though...they got Trump's mindset perfectly.

Poe's law strikes again.

 

[John Doe]

That is one of the whitest things I've ever seen.

 

[goldytheGoldfish]

What's the saying? You don't have to be faster than the bear...

 

[Fuzzy1975]

What's the saying? You don't have to be faster than the bear...

Smart people don't run.

 

[butters]

can't see that cannon had any option in this ruling but, hey, no doubt it's all grist for the mill and trump will use it to beg for cash... "MY WITNESSES WERE DENIED!!!! SO UNFAIR!!! RIGGED!!!"

The judge in Donald Trump's classified documents case has refused to allow two members of the public to testify on Trump's behalf.

The pair, who have no connection to the case, wanted to testify about the alleged unfairness and waste of money in the case. They sought to enter as "friends of the court," a legal position normally reserved for expert opinion that is given for either side in a case.

so these two wanted a stage on which to whine into a microphone about how unfair and costly the case was.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=a5c047e187a24a0ea68b44d188c98f1b&ei=55

 

[butters]

S.P Jack Smith spells it out for cannon; if she refuses the gag order and there are violent consequences, this will be brought up in evidence against her holding onto the position of Judge in the trial:

"Statements that present a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to the law enforcement agents working on this case pose a significant and imminent threat to the integrity of these criminal proceedings," Smith wrote in the filing.

Smith's filing cites a June 11 incident involving a Texas man who allegedly contacted and threatened an FBI agent working on an investigation of Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden.

"Just last week, a supporter of Trump called an FBI agent associated with the Hunter Biden case and claimed that, if Trump wins reelection, FBI agents will be thrown in jail; and if he does not win, the agents will be 'hunt[ed] down' and 'slaughter[ed]' in their own homes, after which '[w]e're going to slaughter your whole f***ing family,'" the special counsel wrote. "No court would tolerate another defendant deliberately creating such immediate risks to the safety of law enforcement, and this Court should not wait for a tragic event before taking action in this case."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...31&cvid=df7baf586fa14940988485e052fbf528&ei=5

 

[Pad_Foot]

Catch 22
Oversight…. By Biden! Election interference
Or
No oversight Rogue Shadow Deep State Government and OUR public official says “Oh, that sounds ominous” ??

WTF

Try the damn case!!

Trump has dragged all of this out
“Turn over ALL the People’s shit that you accident carted home.” Done!!
Simple!! Follow the fucking “rules”!!!
We are 3 years past that point??
Someone post a timeline on this
It was NOT started during an election!!
Period

 

[butters]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=0a4b96142462472aa0e2ba5657edcc72&ei=83

Judge Aileen Cannon has denied Donald Trump adviser Stephen Miller and America First Legal's request to challenge a potential federal gag order against the ex-president in his Mar-a-Lago classified documents case.

According to court documents, Cannon signed a paperless order Saturday denying an amicus brief submitted to the Southern District of Florida by America First Legal (AFL), composed of people including Miller, Trump's former senior adviser and AFL president.

 

[Pad_Foot]

Cannon is listening to ‘rump’s team complain that classified documents were separated?!

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/ne...-boxes-keepsakes-alongside-sensitive-records/

Said in total valley girl mode
“Oh my God, your Honor! They moved the body and left a painted outline! How can we possibly defend our client now??!!”

 

[butters]

thomas gives cannon a route to trying to toss Smith off her case, despite his premise having been disproved time and time again.

“If there is no law establishing the office that the Special Counsel occupies, then he cannot proceed with this prosecution,” Thomas wrote, the Washington Post reported. “A private citizen cannot criminally prosecute anyone, let alone a former President.”

Because Smith should not have been appointed, the argument goes, Cannon should dismiss the case against Trump.

Former prosecutor Chuck Rosenberg told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that this was a vapid argument.

"This is an issue that has been litigated many times, and each time, the courts of the United States have determined that special counsels like Jack Smith are constitutionally permitted, that their funding is constitutionally permitted [and] they still are inferior officers to the attorney general of the United States," Rosenberg said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=9647738e54ec473eb056f35a965adab7&ei=26