SINthysist
Rural Racist Homophobe
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2001
- Posts
- 11,940
Dostoyevsky and the Anniversary of 9-11
Lev Navrozov
Monday, Sept. 9, 2002
What is remarkable about the anniversary of 9-11? For the past year I, personally, have not heard anything new about the attack. The 19 attackers remain 19 unknowns, except for the data on their airline certificates indicating that 15 of them were Saudis.
On the other hand, fictions that were spread by officials, public figures and authors, as well as the "hosts" and "guests" of the mainstream media, are spread today as intensely as a year ago.
The root of these fictions is the inability of these officials, public figures, authors and TV hosts and guests to understand suicide sublimated into terrorism. They have never attempted any suicide. They take their own lives for granted. Nor do they read Dostoyevsky to understand a "self-murderer" as Dostoyevsky understood him on the basis of the Russian suicidal terrorism of the "revolutionary movement," in which he had been personally involved and, indeed, barely escaped the death sentence.
On 9-11-01 and thereafter, the U.S. mainstream media even spread the opinion that the suicidal terrorist attack of 9-11-01 was an act of cowardice. That is, some of those who did not have the courage to declare publicly something that runs counter to a prevalent conformity regarded themselves as heroes, while the 19 Moslems rushing themselves into the hellish fire, to be pulverized into fiery dust in order to kill as many infidels as possible, were regarded by them as 19 cowards who are not worth knowing anything about except that they are cowards who perpetrated an act of cowardice.
Accordingly, suicidal terrorism has been visualized by the U.S. politico-cultural establishment as follows. The key figure is the invented boss or chief, like the invented bin Laden, Saddam Hussein or another fictitious figure having a remote connection with those bearing these names. The boss-chief compiles a list of those who are to ram hijacked airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. "How many men do we need for this operation?" he asks his chief expert, who produces his pocket calculator and after some fingering of it, brightly answers: "A score or so, Boss!" Whereupon the boss-chief orders: "Call 20 or so suitable men to my office one by one!"
Now, some of those called to the boss-chief']s office seem to be reluctant to part with their lives. But Good Heavens! How the boss-chief bawls them out! He even threatens to deprive them of the bonuses this year or demote them! Cowards as they are, they hide their reluctance and fulfill the boss-chief’s orders, about which one boss-chief (bin Laden) produced even a videotape, proving that he had nothing to do with the attack of 9-11-01.
It should be noted that in the imagination of the U.S. politico-cultural establishment, all these bosses and chiefs giving orders to (suicidal) terrorists as to their low-level subordinates or soldiers are "linked." Thus, bin Laden is "linked" with Saddam Hussein. Hence, a poor terrorist faces a global terrorist superbureaucracy ordering him about. How can he (a coward!) disobey its global orders?
Let us now suppose that Dostoyevsky was to describe the scene: a (suicidal) terrorist being bawled out by the boss-chief (like bin Laden) of the global terrorist superbureaucracy. Dostoyevsky would have described how the suicidal terrorist would have taken the megalomaniac liar bin Laden by his theatrical Islamic beard and bashed his head against the wall (whereupon this feeble-minded and physically sick "warrior," playing at terrorism, would have croaked, without any consequences to history).
Dostoyevsky would have explained that a suicidal terrorist is more powerful than any emperor and freer than the freest human being ever envisaged by any libertarian: a "self-murderer" can do anything with impunity, for he has sentenced himself (or herself) to death and can execute his (or her) sentence whenever he (or she) pleases.
In the past 150 years or so, when suicidal terrorism has been rampant, it has been carried out by the suicidal terrorists, not by bosses, chiefs, heads of governments or terrorist organizations, or any other bureaucrats cherishing their lives and hence often incapable even of understanding the suicidal terrorists they allegedly order about.
Yes, the suicidal terrorists may take money, needed for their terrorist project (rather than earn it as American taxi drivers, for example). But those who give them money do not acquire any power over their fatal will and decision to do and die – and know why.
In 1934, Stalin's subordinate ruling Leningrad, Sergei Kirov, was assassinated by a minor official named Nikolayev. Stalin said that Nikolayev was Trotsky's agent, while later it was said that he was Stalin's tool. Actually, Kirov had seduced (raped?) Nikolayev's wife. Possibly Nikolayev was genetically inclined to suicide. His genetic inclination sublimated into the suicidal murder of his rival (a common case on the police blotter of any country). The rival personified the injustice (inequality) of the new Soviet society. Neither Trotsky nor Stalin could force Nikolayev, who had sentenced himself to death.
So, what is the moral of 9-11-01 a year after the event?
The suicidal terrorist act was committed by 19 suicidal terrorists, not by bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, Trotsky, Stalin or whatever fictitious "bosses” the U.S. politico-cultural establishment may invent. Some of these 19 terrorists were graduates of one of the world’s best technological institutions (in Hamburg). They needed no bosses at the other end of the world.
Nineteen suicidal terrorists acting as a single being, with precision and without hesitation, is unique in the history of terrorism in the past 150 years. Using bioagents, they could have killed not 3,000, but 3 or 30 million Americans. Instead, they (fortunately) used hijacking, known since 1931, and ramming, about which every Soviet schoolboy knew in the 1940s, since it was used by Soviet pilots in World War II.
What is in store? This depends neither upon governments like Saddam Hussein’s nor upon "terrorist" organizations like "al-Qaeda" (a fraud), but on the number of Moslems genetically inclined to suicide and to sublimating their genetic inclination into suicidal terrorism, making them martyrs bound for paradise. The number is unpredictable, but some members of the U.S. administration seem to be determined to increase it.
The shift of attention from the suicidal terrorists to their imaginary bosses or chiefs offers great advantages to the U.S. administration. The "anthrax terrorist" has not been apprehended by the FBI or CIA. On the other hand, nothing is easier than to have a "nice little victorious war" against a small defenseless or weak country to "punish" the imaginary "bosses" or "chiefs" and kill by bombs several thousand Afghans or Iraqis.
*****
This piece is a variation on one of the themes of my book in progress: "Out of Moscow and Into New York: A Life in the Geostrategically Lobotomized West in the Age of Terrorism and Post-Nuclear Superweapons." Publishers: The 27-page Proposal and the first 130-page part of the book can be mailed to you if you apply to me (navlev@cloud9.net, tel. 001 718 796 6038).
Lev Navrozov
Monday, Sept. 9, 2002
What is remarkable about the anniversary of 9-11? For the past year I, personally, have not heard anything new about the attack. The 19 attackers remain 19 unknowns, except for the data on their airline certificates indicating that 15 of them were Saudis.
On the other hand, fictions that were spread by officials, public figures and authors, as well as the "hosts" and "guests" of the mainstream media, are spread today as intensely as a year ago.
The root of these fictions is the inability of these officials, public figures, authors and TV hosts and guests to understand suicide sublimated into terrorism. They have never attempted any suicide. They take their own lives for granted. Nor do they read Dostoyevsky to understand a "self-murderer" as Dostoyevsky understood him on the basis of the Russian suicidal terrorism of the "revolutionary movement," in which he had been personally involved and, indeed, barely escaped the death sentence.
On 9-11-01 and thereafter, the U.S. mainstream media even spread the opinion that the suicidal terrorist attack of 9-11-01 was an act of cowardice. That is, some of those who did not have the courage to declare publicly something that runs counter to a prevalent conformity regarded themselves as heroes, while the 19 Moslems rushing themselves into the hellish fire, to be pulverized into fiery dust in order to kill as many infidels as possible, were regarded by them as 19 cowards who are not worth knowing anything about except that they are cowards who perpetrated an act of cowardice.
Accordingly, suicidal terrorism has been visualized by the U.S. politico-cultural establishment as follows. The key figure is the invented boss or chief, like the invented bin Laden, Saddam Hussein or another fictitious figure having a remote connection with those bearing these names. The boss-chief compiles a list of those who are to ram hijacked airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. "How many men do we need for this operation?" he asks his chief expert, who produces his pocket calculator and after some fingering of it, brightly answers: "A score or so, Boss!" Whereupon the boss-chief orders: "Call 20 or so suitable men to my office one by one!"
Now, some of those called to the boss-chief']s office seem to be reluctant to part with their lives. But Good Heavens! How the boss-chief bawls them out! He even threatens to deprive them of the bonuses this year or demote them! Cowards as they are, they hide their reluctance and fulfill the boss-chief’s orders, about which one boss-chief (bin Laden) produced even a videotape, proving that he had nothing to do with the attack of 9-11-01.
It should be noted that in the imagination of the U.S. politico-cultural establishment, all these bosses and chiefs giving orders to (suicidal) terrorists as to their low-level subordinates or soldiers are "linked." Thus, bin Laden is "linked" with Saddam Hussein. Hence, a poor terrorist faces a global terrorist superbureaucracy ordering him about. How can he (a coward!) disobey its global orders?
Let us now suppose that Dostoyevsky was to describe the scene: a (suicidal) terrorist being bawled out by the boss-chief (like bin Laden) of the global terrorist superbureaucracy. Dostoyevsky would have described how the suicidal terrorist would have taken the megalomaniac liar bin Laden by his theatrical Islamic beard and bashed his head against the wall (whereupon this feeble-minded and physically sick "warrior," playing at terrorism, would have croaked, without any consequences to history).
Dostoyevsky would have explained that a suicidal terrorist is more powerful than any emperor and freer than the freest human being ever envisaged by any libertarian: a "self-murderer" can do anything with impunity, for he has sentenced himself (or herself) to death and can execute his (or her) sentence whenever he (or she) pleases.
In the past 150 years or so, when suicidal terrorism has been rampant, it has been carried out by the suicidal terrorists, not by bosses, chiefs, heads of governments or terrorist organizations, or any other bureaucrats cherishing their lives and hence often incapable even of understanding the suicidal terrorists they allegedly order about.
Yes, the suicidal terrorists may take money, needed for their terrorist project (rather than earn it as American taxi drivers, for example). But those who give them money do not acquire any power over their fatal will and decision to do and die – and know why.
In 1934, Stalin's subordinate ruling Leningrad, Sergei Kirov, was assassinated by a minor official named Nikolayev. Stalin said that Nikolayev was Trotsky's agent, while later it was said that he was Stalin's tool. Actually, Kirov had seduced (raped?) Nikolayev's wife. Possibly Nikolayev was genetically inclined to suicide. His genetic inclination sublimated into the suicidal murder of his rival (a common case on the police blotter of any country). The rival personified the injustice (inequality) of the new Soviet society. Neither Trotsky nor Stalin could force Nikolayev, who had sentenced himself to death.
So, what is the moral of 9-11-01 a year after the event?
The suicidal terrorist act was committed by 19 suicidal terrorists, not by bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, Trotsky, Stalin or whatever fictitious "bosses” the U.S. politico-cultural establishment may invent. Some of these 19 terrorists were graduates of one of the world’s best technological institutions (in Hamburg). They needed no bosses at the other end of the world.
Nineteen suicidal terrorists acting as a single being, with precision and without hesitation, is unique in the history of terrorism in the past 150 years. Using bioagents, they could have killed not 3,000, but 3 or 30 million Americans. Instead, they (fortunately) used hijacking, known since 1931, and ramming, about which every Soviet schoolboy knew in the 1940s, since it was used by Soviet pilots in World War II.
What is in store? This depends neither upon governments like Saddam Hussein’s nor upon "terrorist" organizations like "al-Qaeda" (a fraud), but on the number of Moslems genetically inclined to suicide and to sublimating their genetic inclination into suicidal terrorism, making them martyrs bound for paradise. The number is unpredictable, but some members of the U.S. administration seem to be determined to increase it.
The shift of attention from the suicidal terrorists to their imaginary bosses or chiefs offers great advantages to the U.S. administration. The "anthrax terrorist" has not been apprehended by the FBI or CIA. On the other hand, nothing is easier than to have a "nice little victorious war" against a small defenseless or weak country to "punish" the imaginary "bosses" or "chiefs" and kill by bombs several thousand Afghans or Iraqis.
*****
This piece is a variation on one of the themes of my book in progress: "Out of Moscow and Into New York: A Life in the Geostrategically Lobotomized West in the Age of Terrorism and Post-Nuclear Superweapons." Publishers: The 27-page Proposal and the first 130-page part of the book can be mailed to you if you apply to me (navlev@cloud9.net, tel. 001 718 796 6038).
