Sucks to be this guy.

[SweetWitch]

Just goes to show, never mess with a daddy's little girl.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20025596-504083.html?tag=latest

 

[SeaCat]

I'll be interested to read the comments from this board.

Cat

 

[EmeraldKitten]

What's the 'attempted murder' about?
For any unborn babies he might've had swimming around up there?

People are nuts. HA! Oh, erm, excuse me.
People are crazy.

Is that a plot bunny I see? lol.

 

[Stella_Omega]

I got nothing.

 

[voluptuary_manque]

Yanno, I knew a girl once who never dated anyone who wasn't at least as old as her father. Struck me as odd but I think this response is a little extreme.

 

[SweetWitch]

What's the 'attempted murder' about?
For any unborn babies he might've had swimming around up there?

People are nuts. HA! Oh, erm, excuse me.
People are crazy.

Is that a plot bunny I see? lol.

The guy almost bled out before help got there. He's now permanently gelded and not likely to be taking advantage of any little girls any time soon.

 

[SweetWitch]

Yanno, I knew a girl once who never dated anyone who wasn't at least as old as her father. Struck me as odd but I think this response is a little extreme.

Extreme? Maybe, but the child was still school-age. When I was 17, I started dating a guy who was just shy of his 21st birthday. My father nearly had a heart attack. The difference was just under 4 years, but Pop felt a "little girl" should not be going with a "grown man". He was in college, I was in high school. Dad was pissed. I can't imagine how he would've felt about my dating someone old enough to be Grandpa.

 

[Boxlicker101]

The guy almost bled out before help got there. He's now permanently gelded and not likely to be taking advantage of any little girls any time soon.

At 17 years old, she's not really a "little girl" anymore. In Germany, the age of consent is 16. I think he will still be able to fuck, once he recovers, but he won't be able to impregnate anybody.

I'm not defending the guy; I will still call him a dirty old man.

I read this other item also. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20025657-504083.html?tag=latest I wonder if this will become a big stink as similar cases have.

 

[R. Richard]

It turns out that castration of an adult man removes the possibility of him impregmnating a girl, but not of him getting an erection and screwing her.

Back when, eunuchs guarded the harems of some middle eastern Kings. It was found that a eunuch could still get an erection and screw one of the King's wives. However, he was unable to impregnate her.

 

[JackLuis]

It turns out that castration of an adult man removes the possibility of him impregmnating a girl, but not of him getting an erection and screwing her.

Back when, eunuchs guarded the harems of some middle eastern Kings. It was found that a eunuch could still get an erection and screw one of the King's wives. However, he was unable to impregnate her.

Is that true? I always thought a eunuch couldn't get it up? This puts a whole new complexion to a story I'm working on.

 

[Stella_Omega]

The guy almost bled out before help got there. He's now permanently gelded and not likely to be taking advantage of any little girls any time soon.

At 17 I was not a "little girl."

Neither were you.

You and I were "llittle girls" at ages eight, ten, thirteen, fourteen... I had my first snogging and clothes-on-humping encounter age fifteen-ish and lost my PIV virginity at age sixteen and a half, and I think your "little girl" line is insulting to the teen-aged sexually active people of this world.

The dude will take testosterone supplements the rest of his life. Also from what I understand, having a lot of orgasms is very beneficial to the castrated male.

 

[SweetWitch]

Is that true? I always thought a eunuch couldn't get it up? This puts a whole new complexion to a story I'm working on.

In the age of the famed Castrati, boys were castrated so that they would not "lose" their voices. They were then trained in opera, as entertainers. These men were often employed by rich matrons as sex toys. I cannot remember where I read it, but I remember a letter from one such woman who touted the marvels of the magnificent knife. Apparently, castrated males could maintain erections far longer than any of her previous lovers.

At 17 I was not a "little girl."

Neither were you.

You and I were "llittle girls" at ages eight, ten, thirteen, fourteen... I had my first snogging and clothes-on-humping encounter age fifteen-ish and lost my PIV virginity at age sixteen and a half, and I think your "little girl" line is insulting to the teen-aged sexually active people of this world.

The dude will take testosterone supplements the rest of his life. Also from what I understand, having a lot of orgasms is very beneficial to the castrated male.

You can be insulted all you want, Stella. Call me old-fashioned, but I don't believe a school aged girl should be used by a man old enough to be her grandfather. She should be with persons her own age. I would be very upset if I found out someone my husband's age was screwing my daughter--even at the age of 17. It reminds me too much of those poor girls in that strange Mormon sect who were forced into such situations.

Not every girl at age 17 is sexually active. Hard to believe, I know, but it happens. I can name 3 in my own family. I can also name 4 more who are. For myself, I managed to hang onto my virginity until I was 18--and then it was my choice with no pressure from him.

Edited to add: At 16 and 17 I was still trying to figure out who I was. It would have been easy for some old dude to take advantage of me at that point. And taking advantage is what the castrated man was doing. The very young--girls and boys alike--are easily influenced, and often those influences aren't good ones.

 

[Stella_Omega]

My own daughter didn't do PIV untill her twenties-- but the 17 year-old "little girl" in question was, undoubtedly, sexually active. And I made no sweeping generalization, I said that you insult the sexually active teenagers with your assumptions.

I didn't call you "old fashioned." I called you assumptive. You have absolutely no idea of who she is or what she wanted-- only what her father decided, and what he did. He might have been right, the guy might have been a predator. But so far the only thing we know about him, really, is his age. And you are making a world of assumption based on that.

 

[SweetWitch]

My own daughter didn't do PIV untill her twenties-- but the 17 year-old "little girl" in question was, undoubtedly, sexually active. And I made no sweeping generalization, I said that you insult the sexually active teenagers with your assumptions.

I didn't call you "old fashioned." I called you assumptive. You have absolutely no idea of who she is or what she wanted-- only what her father decided, and what he did. He might have been right, the guy might have been a predator. But so far the only thing we know about him, really, is his age. And you are making a world of assumption based on that.

Ah, but I am old-fashioned. I still believe in the natural innocence of youth. Yes, the girl was sexually active--obviously. Was it her choice? Maybe. Teen years are confusing. I remember how miserable it was. There was pressure at home to be a "good girl" and pressure from my peers to fall back with my legs in the air. It was difficult, hormones raging and opportunities presenting themselves at every turn.

HIV and AIDS were still whispered about behind hands. The big fears were herpes and pregnancy. Everywhere I turned, someone was trying to work on that confusion, to take what I wasn't ready to give. If a grown man with real experience had been given the opportunity or showed any interest, it's likely I would have been in trouble.

I don't care what the girl wanted. A man of 57 years should know better than to screw a girl who's still school-aged. It may be that he was a predator, it may be that she was the local Lolita. Whatever the case, the man should know better. Youth can be immature, make stupid decisions--often based in ignorance and inexperience. The girl is likely not blameless, but the man was plain wrong. He had no business bedding her.

As far as his punishment--no, I don't condone it. Looking at my 9-year-old, though, I can understand the father's feelings. When princess was in kindergarten, she was upset by a neighbor boy. He was just in 2nd grade, but he told her that if he said she had to have sex with him, she had to do it. He told her that she had to do whatever a boy tells her to do.

At the time he said these things, he had her cornered in another neighbor's house. The mother of the house was there, heard what was going on and sent the other boy home. He was no longer allowed to play with her kids and I had a long talk with the boy's mother after I found out. When my daughter talked to me about it, she was upset and scared. She said she thought he was going to hurt her. Hearing this, what I wanted to do was slap the taste out of the boy's mouth. I mean, how dare he do this to my kid? That's how I felt and we're talking about little kids here.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Your examples are saddening, and i can see why this might push some buttons for you.

But a kindergartner is not a 17 year old. Five is a "little girl." Seventeen really shouldn't be, and if that girl was "innocent" about sexual predators then her dad should have turned his rage on his own damn self IMO.

Your experiences are yours-- Many other women may share them but they are not universal, and to insist that they are is... well maybe that insistence is "old fashioned."

BTW, your daughter lost a certain amount of "innocence" at five years old, but she gained some knowledge that protected her in much stronger ways.

I think the girl deserves a certain amount of consideration in all of this. I wonder how long it will be before her and dad start talking again. Talk about a massive display of disrespect!

(edit) and if you want to talk about "guidance" the dad might have better turned his rage on himself, huh? he should have worried about her "innocence" before it was "stolen." The best way to do that-- is education.

 

[SweetWitch]

Your examples are saddening, and i can see why this might push some buttons for you.

But a kindergartner is not a 17 year old. Five is a "little girl." Seventeen really shouldn't be, and if that girl was "innocent" about sexual predators then her dad should have turned his rage on his own damn self IMO.

Your experiences are yours-- Many other women may share them but they are not universal, and to insist that they are is... well maybe that is "old fashioned."

BTW, your daughter lost a certain amount of "innocence" at five years old, but she gained some knowledge that protected her in much stronger ways.

I think the girl deserves a certain amount of consideration in all of this. I wonder how long it will be before her and dad start talking again. Talk about a massive display of disrespect!

I have been arming my child from an early age about looking after her body and her own choices. My hope is she won't be sexually active 17, but that she'll wait for a little more experience with life.

There was no insistence that my opinions are universal. Quite the contrary. I admitted to being out-dated. I still hold that a girl is a girl until she comes of age, and even then may be too green to take on the world. And it's not just girls. It's boys, too.

And fathers...Daddies tend to be even more protective of their little girls--at least in my family. How long will it be before the father in question and the girl speak again? When I was 17, I got my first hickey. My dad didn't talk to me for weeks. He was pissed. If he only knew it wasn't from a romantic session of hot necking, but from a local goof-ball at a party playing a prank, I don't think he would have been so upset, but being 17, I wasn't inclined to give him the satisfaction of an explanation.

To be honest, I grew up in a very sheltered, provincial attmosphere where most girls in my class had the same type of parental supervision. We had curfews, supervised parties, and were compelled to "behave". If someone else's parent saw me doing something I shouldn't, my parents knew about it before I got home.

Come to think of it, it was a real buzz-kill.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I have been arming my child from an early age about looking after her body and her own choices. My hope is she won't be sexually active 17, but that she'll wait for a little more experience with life.

There was no insistence that my opinions are universal. Quite the contrary. I admitted to being out-dated. I still hold that a girl is a girl until she comes of age, and even then may be too green to take on the world. And it's not just girls. It's boys, too.

And fathers...Daddies tend to be even more protective of their little girls--at least in my family. How long will it be before the father in question and the girl speak again? When I was 17, I got my first hickey. My dad didn't talk to me for weeks. He was pissed. If he only knew it wasn't from a romantic session of hot necking, but from a local goof-ball at a party playing a prank, I don't think he would have been so upset, but being 17, I wasn't inclined to give him the satisfaction of an explanation.

To be honest, I grew up in a very sheltered, provincial attmosphere where most girls in my class had the same type of parental supervision. We had curfews, supervised parties, and were compelled to "behave". If someone else's parent saw me doing something I shouldn't, my parents knew about it before I got home.

Come to think of it, it was a real buzz-kill.

In Germany, the age of consent is 16, as it is many other places. I don't know, but maybe a girl is considered to be "of age" then for other things. I'm not defending the DOM, but I think daddy overracted.

Even in the US, there are 16 year olds who get married, even if they don't have to.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Castrating a guy is probably an overreaction. Unless he turns out to have been a serial rapist or.. who knows... and no one has come up with that news yet.