Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unsatisfying. No I would'nt say that. I'd say intense. I'd say liberating. I'd say emotive. I'd say exploratory. I'd say frustrating. I'd say obsessive.I'm right there. Except I don't have a cat.
I think D/s without love is a fuck-buddy relationship.
I think D/s with love is just like any other relationship between two people in love. Kinkier, but the principle is the same. I also think the D/s bond will be a lot stronger.
Of course there are exceptions. There always is.
As for online relationships, I think they're like methadone. They're not the real deal, and they don't give you what you really want, but they're better than nothing. They can do a good job scratching that itch, but ultimately, they're unsatisfying.
JJ
Real life relationships can be intense, liberating and emotional just as well, with added touch, smell, look in the eyes, actually living together.
However you might think your online relationship is "all that", ultimately you will get unsatisfied with lack of real life contact. Maybe not tomorrow but after some time for sure.
And that is what JammyJimmy talks about. Until we can evolute to just a mind without a body no online relationship can be just the same and equally satisfying as a real life one. Unless all you want is short term and superficial without real involvement, in that case they are just as good if not better.
Many people who have on-line relationships consider them to be "real life contact". Just because a relationship is on-line it does not mean it is superficial.
Also, there are some couples who see each other in person everyday who do not have the mental connection some couple have whose only communication is through their computers.
I personally do need to see, feel and touch my dominant in addition to IMing, phone and email conversation. But the occasional long stretch of time between meetings does not diminish the relationship, or make it superficial in any way.
Many people who have on-line relationships consider them to be "real life contact". Just because a relationship is on-line it does not mean it is superficial.
I never said that. I said that they are not equally satisfying. I said if all you want is online and never feel the need to touch that person for real - its superficial.
And I am really tired of some "my ldr is exactly the same thing as living together" knee jerk reactions every time I state my opinion on the subject. Sorry to burst your bubble but its not. It is not even close to the same thing. Aside emotions and everything else living in the same house and washing his socks is not the same as living half the world apart and seeing him on webcam.
Can the oposite also be said? If some one is only interested in the physical and not interested in the emotion and mental connection is that also superficial?
Well... I'm strange so my opinion my not be representative, but...Someone here said "its not real, just fantasy" but it feels real to me.
I never said we don't have real life contact.Real life relationships can be intense, liberating and emotional just as well, with added touch, smell, look in the eyes, actually living together.
However you might think your online relationship is "all that", ultimately you will get unsatisfied with lack of real life contact. Maybe not tomorrow but after some time for sure.
And that is what JammyJimmy talks about. Until we can evolute to just a mind without a body no online relationship can be just the same and equally satisfying as a real life one. Unless all you want is short term and superficial without real involvement, in that case they are just as good if not better.
I never said we don't have real life contact.
Actually yes, for me it is. And now we can argue on why "superficial" is deemed something bad and unworthy as well. It works for some people, more power to them. I like to be superficial now and then as well, but I am aware I am being exactly that. Selfish, superficial, callous. I have no problem admitting I am capable of being "less than perfect".
If you are completely happy living alone in your home and having online exclusively relationship because that is what suits you, I have no problem with your choice.
But if you try to proclaim 6 months of such relationship just as valid and completely equal to my 16 years long marriage I am sorry but I disagree. Because at that point I dont think you know what you are talking about. I tried both, I can tell the difference, and, for me, there is a huge difference.
To be perfectly honest, I get horrified when I see people stating online relationships are completely equal to real life ones, it just depends on the subjects involved.
And then I am dismissive if I say that in my book that means either ignorance or superficiality? So be it. Lets just agree to disagree.

I am very much in love with Sir, and he with me as well. Yes, we are only online/phone at this point.... but as soon as we can we are going to meet!
![]()
I never said that. I said that they are not equally satisfying. I said if all you want is online and never feel the need to touch that person for real - its superficial.
And I am really tired of some "my ldr is exactly the same thing as living together" knee jerk reactions every time I state my opinion on the subject. Sorry to burst your bubble but its not. It is not even close to the same thing. Aside emotions and everything else living in the same house and washing his socks is not the same as living half the world apart and seeing him on webcam.
I can't and won't judge another person's relationship and call it invalid, or superficial or not equal because I know how chemistry really can be felt through a computer screen and phone line.
I'm sure I won't burst any bubble with telling you, that the chemistry you are speaking of is a completely mental thing and not chemical at all.
I don't want to judge any other relationships, too. But there is chemistry involved when two people meet in person and that makes a difference.
Lucky you that this chemistry thing worked for your transferring the relationship from online to real. But that isn't always the case.
And that's why I personally and only for me myself and nobody else find online relationships inferior to real ones. They just... lack this one component which is crucial for befriending, fucking and loving people in person.
But isn't mental stimulous little chemical reactions in the brain?
I do understand what you are saying. My biggest fear when I first went to meet Jounar was that I would travel 3500 miles and find out that I was not attracted to him physically. And I have had that happen with one that I met online first. He's probably the only case where I had absolutely no phyisical connection what so ever. But then, I fully admit I'm easy.
It is. But of a totally different kind.
Talking about pheromones and stuff...
Online just leaves the one question to be answered when meeting personally:
Does it fit or does it not?
Until this question get's its answer it's just... not complete... for me! (!! <- )
But since you perfectly understood and even have an example I don't need to tell you that.![]()
Yeah, I was more just being a smart ass than anything else.![]()
