sweetnpetite
Intellectual snob
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2003
- Posts
- 9,135
Princess by day, slut by night- (please read all before responding)
Ok, not a princess. More like a kind, intelligent loving woman who deserves to be respected and treated well, maybe even spoiled a little. Interested in art, books, music, popular culture, alternative religions, and academic pursuits of all kinds.
Now meet her alter-ego, a character she enjoys playing for your pleasure and hers- an extreme submissive who enjoys pushing boundaries, pain, kink, submission, &humiliation- a dumb cunt with a craving to be daddy's little rag-doll, nothing more than a sex toy.
Round and curvy girl,(about 50 extra pounds to give you an idea) but short and cute, age 35 (could easily pass for 25)- seeks good-looking intelligent partner to dominate in the bedroom (BDSM scenes only, no 24/7) approximate age 27-40. Yes a daddy can be younger! Experience with BDSM preferred. Kinky and adventurous with a good heart. (My type can range from a sexy blue collar worker to geeks [#1 Clark Kent], to musicians, and pierced and tattooed "freaks" (think Shaun Morgan NOT Marilyn Manson who I think is rad but not sexy) and artsy creative types, intellectuals, and bad boys with brians, and the occasional buttoned up businessy type... so there is a lot of range for what i find atractive, but there will obviously have to be a physical connection.)
I am heavy set, so I am looking for a man who is attracted to bigger girls yet I don't want to be someone's fetish. Someone who finds me attractive just as i am, and would still like me if I was a size 4.
Special favorites- hair pulling, slapping, biting, being pinned, degradation, name calling, role play, mental bondage, breath play. Know that many activities require a level of trust that builds over time.
Monogamy is not a high priority for me (difficult for many to understand). Loyalty, honesty, respect, intimacy, openness and communication are much more important. I would rather have an honest discussion about the choice of whether to enter into sexual relations with another party than lies and cover-ups. I would rather be with someone who felt they could share all of themselves with me (and be loved and accepted), and I with them (with the same result), than someone who couldn't tell me what was going on in their internal life (even when it's written all over their face.)...Honesty and openness are harder than pretend monogamy. And faithfulness, fidelity, and loyalty are so much more than monogamy. Non-monogamous does not mean anything goes, it means that a lot more communication is necessary.
Anyone interested in meeting in RL (should it ever come to that) should be willing to converse with me for quite some time online. They should also be willing to meet with myself and at least one vanilla friend in a totally non-sexual context. They should be willing and able to make the trip to see me with no guarantee of sex. They should be prepared to spend time with me in a public place. They should be willing to pay for food and/or drinks for at least myself and one other person. They should be respectful (and have respect for my privacy) in the presence of others. There may be more that I would ask.
Must be willing to discuss subjects of a non-sexual matter if you are interested in going beyond internet/cyber. Must be willing to engage in time spent together getting to know one another in a non-sexual manner if you are interested in going beyond internet/cyber. Yes, I am willing to be a naughty naughty slut for the right guy and who knows, maybe even a few "extra's" now and again, but that does not mean that I am about to make myself available to just whoever, whenever. You will have to earn it. And I believe that relationships need time to develop in other areas before the physical aspect is added in.
I am interested in finding someone to date, eventually, but I can't say that it would be a quick process. There will likely be many who never get past internet conversations, so that's something to consider. Just because I'm messaging you or even cybering does not mean that we will meet, date or fuck. If you contact me and I don't respond, it means that you are not for me, please don't send me angry messages, just move on to the next as we may not be right for each other for whatever reason.
If you are even still reading this, feel free to message me with a brief (or lengthy) description of why you like my post or why you feel you fit what I am looking for. (and whereabouts in MI you might be located) I will want a recent, clear, unobstructed photos that show both your face and your body type (nude not necessary) fairly quickly in the process-- will provide same.
ps. I like big words, so a good vocabulary is definitely a turn-on. Also, please be smart enough to know without me having to tell you that the pic in my avatar is NOT me. (and the ass pic on my writing page is about 10 years old now)
If there is anyone I haven't bored or scared off, I would love to hear from you.
Ok, not a princess. More like a kind, intelligent loving woman who deserves to be respected and treated well, maybe even spoiled a little. Interested in art, books, music, popular culture, alternative religions, and academic pursuits of all kinds.
Now meet her alter-ego, a character she enjoys playing for your pleasure and hers- an extreme submissive who enjoys pushing boundaries, pain, kink, submission, &humiliation- a dumb cunt with a craving to be daddy's little rag-doll, nothing more than a sex toy.
Round and curvy girl,(about 50 extra pounds to give you an idea) but short and cute, age 35 (could easily pass for 25)- seeks good-looking intelligent partner to dominate in the bedroom (BDSM scenes only, no 24/7) approximate age 27-40. Yes a daddy can be younger! Experience with BDSM preferred. Kinky and adventurous with a good heart. (My type can range from a sexy blue collar worker to geeks [#1 Clark Kent], to musicians, and pierced and tattooed "freaks" (think Shaun Morgan NOT Marilyn Manson who I think is rad but not sexy) and artsy creative types, intellectuals, and bad boys with brians, and the occasional buttoned up businessy type... so there is a lot of range for what i find atractive, but there will obviously have to be a physical connection.)
I am heavy set, so I am looking for a man who is attracted to bigger girls yet I don't want to be someone's fetish. Someone who finds me attractive just as i am, and would still like me if I was a size 4.
Special favorites- hair pulling, slapping, biting, being pinned, degradation, name calling, role play, mental bondage, breath play. Know that many activities require a level of trust that builds over time.
Monogamy is not a high priority for me (difficult for many to understand). Loyalty, honesty, respect, intimacy, openness and communication are much more important. I would rather have an honest discussion about the choice of whether to enter into sexual relations with another party than lies and cover-ups. I would rather be with someone who felt they could share all of themselves with me (and be loved and accepted), and I with them (with the same result), than someone who couldn't tell me what was going on in their internal life (even when it's written all over their face.)...Honesty and openness are harder than pretend monogamy. And faithfulness, fidelity, and loyalty are so much more than monogamy. Non-monogamous does not mean anything goes, it means that a lot more communication is necessary.
Anyone interested in meeting in RL (should it ever come to that) should be willing to converse with me for quite some time online. They should also be willing to meet with myself and at least one vanilla friend in a totally non-sexual context. They should be willing and able to make the trip to see me with no guarantee of sex. They should be prepared to spend time with me in a public place. They should be willing to pay for food and/or drinks for at least myself and one other person. They should be respectful (and have respect for my privacy) in the presence of others. There may be more that I would ask.
Must be willing to discuss subjects of a non-sexual matter if you are interested in going beyond internet/cyber. Must be willing to engage in time spent together getting to know one another in a non-sexual manner if you are interested in going beyond internet/cyber. Yes, I am willing to be a naughty naughty slut for the right guy and who knows, maybe even a few "extra's" now and again, but that does not mean that I am about to make myself available to just whoever, whenever. You will have to earn it. And I believe that relationships need time to develop in other areas before the physical aspect is added in.
I am interested in finding someone to date, eventually, but I can't say that it would be a quick process. There will likely be many who never get past internet conversations, so that's something to consider. Just because I'm messaging you or even cybering does not mean that we will meet, date or fuck. If you contact me and I don't respond, it means that you are not for me, please don't send me angry messages, just move on to the next as we may not be right for each other for whatever reason.
If you are even still reading this, feel free to message me with a brief (or lengthy) description of why you like my post or why you feel you fit what I am looking for. (and whereabouts in MI you might be located) I will want a recent, clear, unobstructed photos that show both your face and your body type (nude not necessary) fairly quickly in the process-- will provide same.
ps. I like big words, so a good vocabulary is definitely a turn-on. Also, please be smart enough to know without me having to tell you that the pic in my avatar is NOT me. (and the ass pic on my writing page is about 10 years old now)
If there is anyone I haven't bored or scared off, I would love to hear from you.
