'Style' ...

Ally C

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 7, 2000
Posts
2,714
I've recently experienced a strange phenomenon on the BB.

I peruse threads which are old, new, borrowed and blue and reply as and when I see fit, and generally like to interact with the 'good', the 'bad' and the downright 'ugly'. I'm open to new ideas, creative writing, wit in all shapes and forms and post as and when the mood suits me. Sometimes this involves 'getting the books out' (or searching the Internet) to elaborate on a point in a serious discussion. Other times my input is little more than 'idle chatter'. In some cases it could be described as a mixture of both no doubt (some would say only the latter). I make no claims to being a world authority on any subject. I enjoy the written word, and am forever amazed at the power which this has. I enjoy and expect the freedom to reply in any fashion I choose. The good old one word / one short sentence retort works fine. The deeply involved un-paragraphed block of words which takes me several cups of coffee to formulate works equally well. Sometimes I choose to make light of a serious topic, and other times I try to inject some seriousness into a seemingly pointless thread. In all cases I use my own style and sense of humour. I know some of you have commented positively on my contribution(s), and I'm aware that others find me abstract or obtuse. I make no apologies for my posts, and if some find them to be unnecessary interruptions then I have no control over that, and would not have it any other way.

Now ...

... what I do take exception to is when Board activity takes on a sinister tone. You know, when some start talking in 'code', with constant references to emails about a 'certain individual', lots of hints or open [but never entirely open ...] references to 'motives' - when in fact nothing has happened that I or most other people are aware of. The recent thread about 'someone' posting in the style of others is such an example. I'm not sure if this was aimed at me or not, and I would have posted on that thread but didn't, as I found it tedious, insulting, and unnecessary. Having said that, the Board can be like that at times, more's the pity. Why test theories of a personal nature if you've already made up your mind in advance? Your 'answer' will be predictable. At this point I'm tempted to cut and paste this post to the thread in question, as I'm rather disappointed that I feel the need to express my dismay at its contents. It's a no-win situation though. On any other day I would have carried on as normal, but I do have feelings, and wanted to have my say ...

But ...

Maybe I've used too many words on this post? Maybe I shouldn't have said that, as someone might quote me and reply with a singular and mocking "Yes" or "Yes, you have"? Maybe I should post as a guest and fill the Board with abuse? [Not my style, so I won't]. Do I select the 'unhappy' icon to accompany this thread / post? If I do then some might accuse me of craving sympathy, of playing with emotions. You can see how it quickly gets out of hand? There are so many variables ... maybe I should have written "there are so many possibilities"? It probably doesn't matter what action or non-action I take, there will always be some who jump to ridiculous conclusions and pander to their own insecurities while thinking they are above it all. I really don't know. I really enjoy coming to Lit, I hope whoever is reading this does too. If not, then it's maybe yourself that you're not happy with? I wouldn't know, because I'm honestly not interested. Don't take that personally, there's enough of that going on as it is.

Further dialogue welcome ... and I don't mind what you say or how you say it. I'll leave that for others to do.
 
By and large, I agree with what you find objectionable.

It's the adult equivilant of gossiping in the lunch room about "you know who" and giggling behind your hands when the object of your ridicule walks past.

The most damaging part is that the target walks by and hears the giggles... but can never be sure its her they are laughing at.

Traditionally, it's what's done by the "cool kids" to exhibit their superiority.

I don't think you're trolling for sympathy. I think you're turning around to the giggling girls and asking if they've got a problem with you.

Wonder what they'll say.
 
That's a good way of putting it DarlingBri. I wonder if anyone will point out this:

Ally C said:
I enjoy and expect the freedom to reply in any fashion I choose.

.. and then use it as a multi-purpose all-singing all-dancing 'answer' which doesn't really say much? If they want silly, I've got plenty ... but I don't like to do it on demand, as someone else invariably takes the credit for it.
 
Well, I've never understood the issue over that one anyway. If someone wants to post "like me" or "like" anyone else, fine, as long as they don't post "as me" -- ie, under my name. Nobody owns the patent on their attitudes.

I think, for some people, the line between reality and cyber reality is pretty blurry and they depend on their online personas to give them a sense of identity, even in their real lives. Why else would you be so protective of what basicly amounts to a language style?
 
Of course, it's always possible that there are folks threatened by others who can both string together and define words with more than three syllables :)
 
Here's my theory. My life's motto is "Don't lie, cheat, or steal." That serves me well, even at Lit. Then comes my own stance of "stand up for what you believe in, always." That also applies to Lit.

Don't be afraid. Post as you want. People will know you by your content, not your style.
 
DarlingBri said:
Of course, it's always possible that there are folks threatened by others who can both string together and define words with more than three syllables :)

... and then they lash out with tired 'pseudo-intellectual' criticisms such as 'pseudo-intellect'[!] But I know what you mean. As I've said, I like to vary my replies, and like to exercise all of the words at my disposal.

Cheyenne said:
Don't be afraid. Post as you want. People will know you by your content, not your style.

Damn, I wish I'd said that. Ever sidetrack yourself making a point and miss a better line of critique? I think I just have ... well said. I hoped this thread wouldn't spiral into a nonsensical [word]game of cat and mouse, well not straight away at any rate. Thanks for your honest replies.
 
Ally C said:
I hoped this thread wouldn't spiral into a nonsensical [word]game of cat and mouse, well not straight away at any rate... [/B]

The night is young :)
 
re: the night is young

I thought about saying that, but didn't. If I had I would have said "the night / day is young", but you know how it is.
 
I think it's beginning ...

... and I can't fight this feeling anymore! Never could anyway ...
 
Ally C said:
I hoped this thread wouldn't spiral into a nonsensical [word]game of cat and mouse, well not straight away at any rate.

Generally, I choose to use my powers for evil :)

But I agree with the sentiments expressed, ergo, I am able to suppress my overriding need to shanghai most any thread and twist it toward my own sinister purposes.

To add to your point Ally, I've enjoyed the threads with an open divergence of opinions. The best threads are those where the participants don't view the disagreement as an attack on their person but on a particular point or view. I've found myself allied with a particular person on one thread, only to be totally at odds on another. Such is the nature of intelligent discourse.

I personally would like to thank you and Bri for your contributions of late. While I don't always agree with you two, I typically enjoy your comments.

This of course is coming from a man with under 200 posts in more than a year...
 
Bob Peale said:
This of course is coming from a man with under 200 posts in more than a year...

Content, not quantity. Style is up to the individual too. Make 'em count, and let others crunch on the numbers. It'll be a welcome supplement to grass no doubt.


*Note: I know that you know that I know that you know that they know that we know that you know that I know [forever]*

*Another note: But that's not important right now. Never was and never will be*
 
Back
Top