Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does it say why the story has been rejected now; for what reason?
Someone may have reported the story. If you disagree with the reason for rejection, you may send a PM to Laurel to complain. But know that things have changed; topics that were acceptable a couple of years ago may now be considered an issue. And on the other hand, quite often stories with 'forbidden' content do slip through, but that doesn't mean they follow the rules.
The rules have been the same since I've been here, nothing has changed, including the half ass enforcing of them.
The story could get republished, but I think they lose all the votes, comments, etc it gained over the last five years so personally if it were me I wouldn't bother.
I have just received notice that a story of mine has been rejected.
This would not surprise me much except the fact that this story of mine has been on the Literotica site for 5 years!!!!
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
Someone's reported it, and the rejection notice will clue you in as to why.I have just received notice that a story of mine has been rejected.
This would not surprise me much except the fact that this story of mine has been on the Literotica site for 5 years!!!!
Any thoughts?
Scan of OP's submissions finds a lot of non-con and abuse.
Someone going through a back catalogue - although if it's five years old, and someone is reading non-con, there's some sort of a hierarchy of acceptable non-con for that reader, which I find a bit odd.Most of it looks like very dark themes, but it's been there for a while. He hasn't added anything in over a year, and much of it is quite a bit older than that.
I wonder why one story was chosen out of the whole lot.
Part 2 of the war story?
Probably someone reported your story because she was offended by it, and the site administrator has been rather willing to reduce offensive—or reported as such—content on here in the last few years.
The rules have been the same since I've been here, nothing has changed, including the half ass enforcing of them.
Someone's reported it, and the rejection notice will clue you in as to why.
You've got three choices:
1. address the issues being flagged as if it was a new story being submitted now, under today's application of the content policies, and resubmit;
2. argue why it should remain as is (which more than likely won't fly, because it's already been reported); or
3. do nothing, it which case it stays down forever (and coming here's been a waste of time).
Except Laurel's already done a quick review and taken it down, and from what the others are saying, it sounds like the content might be extreme in terms of her criteria in 2021 vs 2016.Option 2 works, I think.
Simplistic example. The story was accepted initially, meaning it met site standards. Then somebody reported is for not meeting site standards. Let's say that they complainant said, "It includes underage sex!" If you resubmit the story and include a note to Laurel in the appropriate box showing that the characters are all over 18, with reasons, then it should go back up with no problems.
Option 2 works, I think.
Simplistic example. The story was accepted initially, meaning it met site standards. Then somebody reported is for not meeting site standards. Let's say that they complainant said, "It includes underage sex!" If you resubmit the story and include a note to Laurel in the appropriate box showing that the characters are all over 18, with reasons, then it should go back up with no problems.
Maybe it has nothing to do with age, but maybe it came too close to non-consent. One of the main characters in Part 2 seems too mentally-ill to give proper consent, and she is raped by a number of men. "Rape" is the word she uses, but she thinks to herself that she deserves it and doesn't try to resist. How would one classify scenes like that?
I now have had a second story deleted. Pity the woman was fine with it for 5 years.
I now have had a second story deleted. Pity the woman was fine with it for 5 years.
She must not only think she deserves it but must enjoy (to some degree) the treatment to be inside the guidelines here. And while I understand some women orgasm during rape, the orgasm doesn't really constitute enjoyment to me. I can write that way, just don't buy it due to personal experience.
But Rules are Rules!