drksideofthemoon
West of the moon. . .
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2005
- Posts
- 4,778
The thread about genre in this forum prompted me to offer this story up. Jinglin' Spurs was my entry in the 2006 Valentines Day Contest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is one I read before and I have to agree it's Romance with a Western flavor.Darkniciad said:I'm going to have to say Romance with a Western flavor. We see the soft spot in the leading man pretty early on. To me, Western with a Romance flavor involves the leading woman scraping away the leathery, weathered layers of rough n' tough to find that soft spot below.
I think it works on all fronts. You have the dialects down, the scene is set well, the characters are vivid, with their own personalities. The romance comes out in build up and the bits of awkward caution.
angelicminx said:I haven't read the whole story yet, but I have a question about something that tripped me up a little bit.
What year is the story set in? I ask because of the use of binoculars. I'm not up on the history of binoculars and I'm curious about when they became readily available, lightweight enough to carry, and inexpensive enough for a ranch hand to have a pair.
I'm not being 'nit picky' or anything like that, I'm genuinely curious.
drksideofthemoon said:Oh, the story is set in the 1880's. Binoculars began to appear around the 1860's. I have a pair that belonged to my great-great-grandfather that has the date of 1895 on them. While they aren't as compact as modern ones, they are by no means cumbersome. As to the price of them back then, I have no idea, but as mentioned in the story, Lucky was a thrifty sort of fellow, and they would have definitely been useful in his line of work. And my great-great grandfather was railroad worker, and by no means a wealthy man.
Varian P said:First, thanks for offering up another sweet, tender story.
I'm afraid I come to this thread with multiple strikes against me: I don't really know anything about genre, in either literary or marketing terms, and I have minimal experience with Romance or Westerns.
Varian P said:That said, it seems to me that "Jinglin' Spurs" centers on the love relationship; the Western aspect seems to be more about the setting than the plot.
Having read some of what others have said in the genre thread, it strikes me that one key element of the Romance genre might be missing from this story: the obstacle that the lovers must overcome to be together.
Yes, they're both a bit shy and uncertain of their worth, and yes, Rose is a 'painted lady', which might be an obstacle to love and marriage in many circumstances, but it never felt like these were real obstacles between the pair in this story. From the get-go, it's clear Lucky wants Rose, and soon after, I'm as sure that Rose is full of hope that things will work out with Lucky. There's never a phase in the story when I'm worried things will go wrong for them, so I never feel the tension and relief that sort of plot arc provides.
Varian P said:In a similar way, there's little tension or excitement in the interactions between the characters, because the range of personalities seems to go from pretty nice to really, really nice. One fellow calls Rose a whore in front of Lucky, and that's the cruelest thing that happens (and he's not even particularly nasty about it). I feel like the sweet moments would be sweeter if they were juxtaposed with a customer of Lou's saying he wouldn't waste good money on an ugly whore, or a client of Rose's treating her mean (not even rough, necessarily, but even just going about his business in a perfunctory way that leaves her feeling like a thing being used, or something along those lines. And/or maybe one of the other girls teases Rose about her boyfriend being dumb as a mule, or what have you.
On the other hand, I thought you handled the dialog well; it worked both to take me into that alien (to me) setting, and also to give unique voices to the different characters.
Varian P said:And I enjoyed little details you brought in to flesh-out the realm of the story, like the cook serving as doctor and surgeon to the men.
Varian P said:One of my favorite things about the story was how tender and new the sex was between these two people who'd been together so many times before--how nervous and excited Rose is as she undresses him for the first time. Very sweet.
-Varian
Those are some great ideas!Varian said:I feel like the sweet moments would be sweeter if they were juxtaposed with a customer of Lou's saying he wouldn't waste good money on an ugly whore, or a client of Rose's treating her mean (not even rough, necessarily, but even just going about his business in a perfunctory way that leaves her feeling like a thing being used, or something along those lines. And/or maybe one of the other girls teases Rose about her boyfriend being dumb as a mule, or what have you.
True, it's interesting, but does the story change if the cook isn't the surgeon?Varian said:And I enjoyed little details you brought in to flesh-out the realm of the story, like the cook serving as doctor and surgeon to the men.
I agree. It's a lovely contrast.Varian said:One of my favorite things about the story was how tender and new the sex was between these two people who'd been together so many times before--how nervous and excited Rose is as she undresses him for the first time.
Penelope Street said:Those are some great ideas!
True, it's interesting, but does the story change if the cook isn't the surgeon?
Penelope Street said:"Yes Rose I do know what you are, you're a woman. You're the woman I love..."
That's my favorite line. It's a sweet little story, realistic and believable too.
If there's a shortcoming to the story, it might be that it's too realistic. What is there to keep this couple apart? Nothing except themselves. True, that's often the way it is in real life- but if real life was so interesting, I don't think we'd be so interested in fiction.
Since the tension is primarily internal, I think it a poor choice to get inside both character's heads. Keeping the perspective with one character would have increased the suspense since the reader would wonder how the other person felt. Isn't that the biggest question in a real world realationship- is the other person interested too? Removing this question really drained the tension from the tale.
I loved that Rose wasn't the prettiest girl at Lou's. Thank you. Girls with round glasses need some lovin' too.
Minor: Lucky was in town for a Saturday night, him and the other hands at the Double 8 had just been paid. I suspect this error was intentional, and meant to lend the tale a folksy style- but I believe this style works best with a first-person narrator. The way it is jarred me a bit- not what one wants from an opening line.
Is it a western or a romance? I don't know, but if there was a 'Western' category at Literotica, I would certainly have submitted it there instead of romance.
Verdad said:Hi, Darkside,
Late again, and this time I'll be really short, since Varian and Penny already said what I would have said, only better.
I'm very glad I found time to read, because it was another sweet offering. There's no doubt in my mind: you have a real storyteller's talent. Keep writing, keep learning and ironing those glitches, because that special something that's already there deserves it.
As for genre hair-splitting? For the Western part to be primary, I'd expect an additional plot line, dealing dramatically with some aspect of life particular to the West and occupying the central place in the story. So, Romance in a Western setting, and a nice one at that. Thanks again!
Best of luck,
Verdad