Spygate 101, A Synopsis For Those Who Don't Want To Wade Into The Minutia

[Rightguide]

This was an attack on the American people and their constitutional franchise to choose their national leader. It was a conspiracy to defraud the American people orchestrated by The Democrat Party, the Obama administration, their Intelligence Community, and their controlled national media:

SpyGate 101: A Primer On The Russia Collusion Hoax’s Years-long Plot To Take Down Trump​

BY: MARGOT CLEVELAND
MARCH 18, 2022


For those who care about our country’s future but don’t want to be buried in the minutia of the Russia collusion hoax scandal, here is your big-picture primer.

As Special Counsel John Durham continues to expose more details of the “SpyGate” or “Russia collusion” scandal, it can be difficult for any apolitical, non-news-junkie member of the public to grasp the ongoing developments.

After all, for more than five years, the corrupt legacy media has refused to report on scandal or done so with a slanted portrayal of the facts. So most Americans remain unaware of the Democrats’ years-long duplicity that sought to destroy first candidate and then President Donald Trump. Add to that reality the overlapping conspiracies and sprawling cast of characters involved, and it can be difficult to follow the story.


That the scandal is dense, however, does not mean it should be ignored. To the contrary, the duplicity must not be disregarded because what Trump’s political enemies tried to accomplish over the course of five years represents the biggest threat our constitutional republic has seen in the last century.

So for those who care about our country and her future but don’t want to be buried in the minutia of the scandal, here is your big-picture primer.

Much more here:
https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/1...ion-hoaxs-years-long-plot-to-take-down-trump/

 

[phrodeau]

If it’s what you say, I love it, especially later in the summer.

I would like you to do us a favor, though.

 

[pecksniff]

the corrupt legacy media

Not much point in reading further, is there?

 

[Rightguide]

Not much point in reading further, is there?

^^^
Translation: I hate to face my lack of intellectual rigor, especially when it is jarringly showcased by Rightguide.

 

[DeluxAuto]

^^^
Translation: I hate to face my lack of intellectual rigor, especially when it is jarringly showcased by Rightguide.

An opinion piece from a alt-right webrag isn't you "showcasing" anything, Reichguide.

 

[Rightguide]

An opinion piece from a alt-right webrag isn't you "showcasing" anything, Reichguide.

The article is written by a very well-known and highly competent source. You could only hope to be as qualified:

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. She is also a contributor to National Review Online, the Washington Examiner, Aleteia, and Townhall.com, and has been published in the Wall Street Journal and USA Today. Cleveland is a lawyer and a graduate of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize—the law school’s highest honor. She later served for nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk for a federal appellate judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Cleveland is a former full-time university faculty member and now teaches as an adjunct from time to time. As a stay-at-home homeschooling mom of a young son with cystic fibrosis, Cleveland frequently writes on cultural issues related to parenting and special-needs children. Cleveland is on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.

 

[pecksniff]

The Federalist:

The Federalist is an American conservative online magazine and podcast that covers politics, policy, culture, and religion, and publishes a newsletter.[1][2][3][4] The site was co-founded by Ben Domenech and Sean Davis and launched in September 2013.[4]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, The Federalist published many pieces that contained false information, pseudoscience, and contradictions or misrepresentations of the recommendations of public health authorities.[5][6][7] While ballots were being counted in the 2020 United States presidential election, The Federalist made false claims that there had been large-scale election fraud.[8][9]

A source with zero credibility, and certainly with no business pointing fingers at the "corrupt legacy media."

 

[pecksniff]

The article is written by a very well-known and highly competent source. You could only hope to be as qualified:

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. She is also a contributor to National Review Online, the Washington Examiner, Aleteia, and Townhall.com

Wait, you said she was competent. No competent or self-respecting journalist would have anything to do with those.

 

[DeluxAuto]

The article is written by a very well-known and highly competent source. You could only hope to be as qualified:

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. She is also a contributor to National Review Online, the Washington Examiner, Aleteia, and Townhall.com, and has been published in the Wall Street Journal and USA Today. Cleveland is a lawyer and a graduate of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize—the law school’s highest honor. She later served for nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk for a federal appellate judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Cleveland is a former full-time university faculty member and now teaches as an adjunct from time to time. As a stay-at-home homeschooling mom of a young son with cystic fibrosis, Cleveland frequently writes on cultural issues related to parenting and special-needs children. Cleveland is on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.

Yes, I'm sure her being a stay-at-home mom qualifies her to give you your opinion, Jack.

 

[BombBastic]

The Federalist:



A source with zero credibility, and certainly with no business pointing fingers at the "corrupt legacy media."

wikipedia isnt a credible source

 

[Rightguide]

The Federalist:



A source with zero credibility, and certainly with no business pointing fingers at the "corrupt legacy media."

Anyone including you can edit a Wiki page. That's why it's a source of only limited value and in this case clearly useless as it spouts leftwing propaganda against all conservative sources. You speaking nonsense like "She is also a contributor to National Review Online, the Washington Examiner, Aleteia, and Townhall.com" as if that alone impeaches her integrity instead of your partisanship is laughable.

 

[icanhelp1]

The article is written by a very well-known and highly competent source. You could only hope to be as qualified:

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. She is also a contributor to National Review Online, the Washington Examiner, Aleteia, and Townhall.com, and has been published in the Wall Street Journal and USA Today. Cleveland is a lawyer and a graduate of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize—the law school’s highest honor. She later served for nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk for a federal appellate judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Cleveland is a former full-time university faculty member and now teaches as an adjunct from time to time. As a stay-at-home homeschooling mom of a young son with cystic fibrosis, Cleveland frequently writes on cultural issues related to parenting and special-needs children. Cleveland is on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.

These know nothing cerebrally challenged dipshits would rather parrot the likes of Keith Olbermann or Joy Reid.

 

[pecksniff]

wikipedia isnt a credible source

What source is more credible? Certainly not The Federalist.

 

[phrodeau]

In that Federalist link, I found this quote by Robby Mook.

I think we need to be concerned that we also saw last week at the Republican Convention that Trump and his allies made changes to the Republican platform to make it more pro-Russian. And we saw him talking about how NATO shouldn’t intervene to defend — necessarily should intervene to defend our Eastern European allies if they are attacked by Russia.

These are both true, but aren’t followed up in the piece at all.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

Anyone including you can edit a Wiki page. That's why it's a source of only limited value and in this case clearly useless as it spouts leftwing propaganda against all conservative sources. You speaking nonsense like "She is also a contributor to National Review Online, the Washington Examiner, Aleteia, and Townhall.com" as if that alone impeaches her integrity instead of your partisanship is laughable.

All fake news outlets, vettedummy.

 

[pecksniff]

These know nothing cerebrally challenged dipshits would rather parrot the likes of Keith Olbermann or Joy Reid.

Both more credible than Cleveland, certainly.

 

[icanhelp1]

Both more credible than Cleveland, certainly.

Only in your tiny tiny mind!

 

[ll74]

Durham's pace and filings suggest much less drama than the piece.

 

[pecksniff]

Only in your tiny tiny mind!

I'm a lot smarter than you.

 

[icanhelp1]

I'm a lot smarter than you.

Again, only in your teenie teenie delusional one celled protoplasm you call a brain.

 

[jomar]

trump’s administration behavior, his election results denial efforts and his 1/6 insurrection indicate trump represents the biggest threat our constitutional republic has seen in the last century.