something interesting i received in email.

rengadeirishman

Built for comfort
Joined
May 13, 2006
Posts
4,440
I'm a little confused. Let me see if I have this straight.....



* If you grow up in Hawaii, raised by your grandparents, you're 'exotic,
different.'


* Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, a quintessential American
story.


* If your name is Barack you're a radical, unpatriotic Muslim.


* Name your kids Willow, Trig and Track, you're a maverick.


* Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable.


* Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you're well
grounded.


* If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the
first
black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration
drive
that registers 150,000 new vo ters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional
Law
professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with
over 750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate's Health and
Human
Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate
representing
a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on
the
Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs
committees, you don't have any real leadership experience.


* If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city
council
and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20
months as
the governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you're qualified
to
become the country's second highest ranking executive.


* If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising
2
beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you're not a real
Christian.


* If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your
disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a
Christian.


* If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including the
proper use of birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society.


* If, while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no
other
option in sex education in your state's school system while your unwed
teen
daughter ends up pregnant, you're very responsible.


* If your wife is a Harvard graduate laywer who gave up a position in a
prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city
community,
then gave that up to raise a family, your family's values don't
represent
America's.


* If you're husband is nicknamed 'First Dude', with at least one DWI
conviction and no college education, who didn't register to vote until
age
25 and once was a member of a group that advocated the secession of
Alaska
from the USA, your family is extremely admirable.


OK, much clearer now.
 
Here is one I got:




You couldn't get a job at McDonalds and become district manager after 143 days of experience.

You couldn't become chief of surgery after 143 days of experience of being a surgeon.

You couldn't get a job as a teacher and be the superintendent after 143 days of experience.


You couldn't join the military and become a colonel after a 143 days of experience.

You couldn't get a job as a reporter and become the nightly news anchor after 143 days of experience.

You couldn't get a job as Director of Nursing after 143 days experience as an RN!

BUT....

'From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logge d 143 days of experience in the Senate. That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working. After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World ... 143 days.


We all have to start somewhere. The senate is a good start, but after 143 days, that's all it is - a start.


AND, strangely, a large sector of the American public is okay with this and campaigning for him. We wouldn't accept this in our own line of work, yet some are okay with this for the Presidency of the United States of America ? Come on folks, we are not voting for the next American Idol!
 
Here is one I got:




You couldn't get a job at McDonalds and become district manager after 143 days of experience.

You couldn't become chief of surgery after 143 days of experience of being a surgeon.

You couldn't get a job as a teacher and be the superintendent after 143 days of experience.


You couldn't join the military and become a colonel after a 143 days of experience.

You couldn't get a job as a reporter and become the nightly news anchor after 143 days of experience.

You couldn't get a job as Director of Nursing after 143 days experience as an RN!

BUT....

'From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logge d 143 days of experience in the Senate. That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working. After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World ... 143 days.


We all have to start somewhere. The senate is a good start, but after 143 days, that's all it is - a start.


AND, strangely, a large sector of the American public is okay with this and campaigning for him. We wouldn't accept this in our own line of work, yet some are okay with this for the Presidency of the United States of America ? Come on folks, we are not voting for the next American Idol!


To repeat what I said elsewhere...

Go for it. Vote for experience first!

Vote for Joe Biden. :D
 
Here is one I got:




You couldn't get a job at McDonalds and become district manager after 143 days of experience.

You couldn't become chief of surgery after 143 days of experience of being a surgeon.

You couldn't get a job as a teacher and be the superintendent after 143 days of experience.


You couldn't join the military and become a colonel after a 143 days of experience.

You couldn't get a job as a reporter and become the nightly news anchor after 143 days of experience.

You couldn't get a job as Director of Nursing after 143 days experience as an RN!

BUT....

'From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logge d 143 days of experience in the Senate. That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working. After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World ... 143 days.


We all have to start somewhere. The senate is a good start, but after 143 days, that's all it is - a start.


AND, strangely, a large sector of the American public is okay with this and campaigning for him. We wouldn't accept this in our own line of work, yet some are okay with this for the Presidency of the United States of America ? Come on folks, we are not voting for the next American Idol!

There's more to it than that, and if you'd open your damned eyes to what's happened to this country in the last eight years, then you wouldn't be voting for the same damn people that put us there to begin with.
 
There's more to it than that, and if you'd open your damned eyes to what's happened to this country in the last eight years, then you wouldn't be voting for the same damn people that put us there to begin with.

Cloudy, go to the AIG bailout thread and see why it's the remains of the Clinton erea corruption that you are complaining about.
 
Last edited:
There's more to it than that, and if you'd open your damned eyes to what's happened to this country in the last eight years, then you wouldn't be voting for the same damn people that put us there to begin with.

Cloudy, whatever they are McC and Moose girl aren't the 'same damn people'.
 
I'd prefer to vote for anyone else!

So what you are telling me then is that your own argument does not apply to you?

Are you actually saying that factors OTHER than experience play into your decision making?
 
So what you are telling me then is that your own argument does not apply to you?

Are you actually saying that factors OTHER than experience play into your decision making?

I'm saying I won't vote for Biden because he stands for things that I will never support. I wouldn't trust him to do anything about shrinking the bloated abcess that is the Federal Govt. Those are the two main reasons that ticket will loose, Obama is the same.
 
Last edited:
I'm saying I won't vote for Biden because he stands for things that I will never support. I wouldn't trust him to do anything about shrinking the bloated abcess that is the Federal Govt. Those are the two main reasons that ticket will loose, Obama is the same.

So then your answer is yes, factors OTHER than experience count for more in your decision making.

Therefore, your opening gambit in this discussion is irrelevant to your own behavior. Now, tell me again why what is irrelevant to your decision should somehow be relevant enough to make me change my behavior.
 
Considering that none of Barack's experience is executive at all, one has to wonder.

Community organizer, what precisely does that mean, anyway? Maybe it's my rustic, West Virginia background, but I've never heard someone explain exactly what that is. If I organize a group of nerds against acne, can I put "community organizer" on my resume then?

Con Law professor....where he proceeded to teach the most absurd interpretation of the Constitution known to man (I mean, really "living document"- give me a break). As is also true of most college profs when it comes to the Constitution, come to think of it.

State Senate, with a record of voting "present" on key issues. Less than a full first term in the U.S. Senate, and half of that spent running for an office that he promised not to seek on the strength of a speech made at a Democratic convention which nominated a man who snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

Where is this vital experience, again?

Not that Palin has much, either, I'll grant you.

But let's look at Biden. Do we even know for sure how much experiene he has, since he likes to fudge his resume? Though I admire him for keeping Bork off the Supreme Court. Thank the Gods for that success. Mind you, many resented him for failing to keep Clarence Thomas off that same court, but I guess that's been forgiven by his fellow Dems, eh?

As for McCain. War hero. Maverick senator. Two-time Presidential candidate. A man of conscience and principle. A man whom I met and respected. But not a man I can vote for anymore. Not with Palin on his ticket and a call for a new, bloated Federal bureaucracy. That's not conservatism, at least in my book.

The people were better off when the Electoral College actually chose the Presidents, instead of being walking mechanisms for expressing popular will. Something tells me that another choice be selected by a truly independent Electoral College.

Anyway, when the best candidates are rejected for the nomination, what do you expect?
 
As for McCain. War hero. Maverick senator. Two-time Presidential candidate. A man of conscience and principle.

A man who has left any sense of honor he might have had in the dust, and doesn't flinch at lying if it'll put him in office.

A man who the men that were with him in POW camp say they're afraid of his "volcanic" temper getting anywhere near our war machine.

A man who's wife doesn't even know what Roe v. Wade is, for fuck's sake, and who has a pill-popping habit that Jimi Hendrix would be proud of.

A man who, upon finding out that his wife (who had stuck by him faithfully) had been in a horrible and disfiguring car accident while he was in Vietnam, promptly cheated on her, then divorced her to marry the woman he was cheating with - Cindy.

Yeah, that's who I want for president. :rolleyes:
 
A man who, upon finding out that his wife (who had stuck by him faithfully) had been in a horrible and disfiguring car accident while he was in Vietnam, promptly cheated on her, then divorced her to marry the woman he was cheating with - Cindy.

Yeah, that's who I want for president. :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]

Whatever happened to one's personal life not being an issue in the election?
 
A man who, upon finding out that his wife (who had stuck by him faithfully) had been in a horrible and disfiguring car accident while he was in Vietnam, promptly cheated on her, then divorced her to marry the woman he was cheating with - Cindy.

Yeah, that's who I want for president. :rolleyes:

Whatever happened to one's personal life not being an issue in the election?[/QUOTE]

It speaks to McCain's integrity, or lack thereof.
 
Whatever happened to one's personal life not being an issue in the election?

It speaks to McCain's integrity, or lack thereof.[/QUOTE]

Hamilton, for instance, would disagree.

And this is the opposite of the argument during the Clinton-Lewinsky business.

Face it. Dems only care about Republican sex scandals, and vice versa.

We Libertarians, on the other hand, leave that crap alone.
 
Where's Ron Paul when you need him? I'm not sure that Bob Barr is the best substitute.

Though I'm tempted to vote for him out of spite. Better a reformed (possibly) social conservative who might have seen the light at last than a so-called maverick who has gone out of his way to kiss the asses of the same preachers he denounced just 8 years ago.

This is why McCain should have bolted the GOP when he lost the nomination. He would have been a serious third-party contender and still retained his reputation as a maverick and a real leader. Palin's selection proves that he sold out totally, and his plan for a new Federal agency shows a distinct lack of fiscal conservatism.

Throw aside the economic liberty, and what possible reason do I have to vote Republican? It's not even remotely my party anymore.

And the Dems never were.
 
Whatever happened to one's personal life not being an issue in the election?

Who the fuck said that?


A person's KIDS personal life's not being an issue in the election? Yeah, I agree with that.


But personal lives of the actual candidates? No, those are actually revealing of character.
 
Who the fuck said that?


A person's KIDS personal life's not being an issue in the election? Yeah, I agree with that.


But personal lives of the actual candidates? No, those are actually revealing of character.

So, then Hamilton's adultery and Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky should be used against them after all, and the electors should appoint themselves moral judges according to standards that not all people even agree on anymore?
 
So, then Hamilton's adultery and Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky should be used against them after all, and the electors should appoint themselves moral judges according to standards that not all people even agree on anymore?

Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky shows things about the man's judgment. But is it criminal???? NO. Is it deserving of a republican-led witchhunt? NO.

Does it make me want to slap Bill across his stupid fucking face and tell him he should have just told the fucking truth? YES.


But the rest of your statement is not at all relevant. I never even hinted that people should appoint themselves moral judges.
 
Back
Top