Socialism brings people down - lowers quality of life

NeverEndingMe

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 20, 2011
Posts
15,925
lets face reality, I know you obama people hate that. The reality is that socialism is this. Socialism brings everyone down to a lower quality of life. period.

you obama people are lazy and I understand why you want socialism..so that you don't have to do anything.

attention obama slaves: time to pay your fair share!

get a job
 
lets face reality, I know you obama people hate that. The reality is that socialism is this. Socialism brings everyone down to a lower quality of life. period.

you obama people are lazy and I understand why you want socialism..so that you don't have to do anything.

attention obama slaves: time to pay your fair share!

get a job

Ouch!

That sounds like something someone told me once. "I vote democrat so I can keep getting welfare." As opposed to getting a job, or moving to another place where jobs in his field were available. :rolleyes:

With so much time on his hands, being idle, it only led to trouble.
Lack of character, and lack of judgement!
 
Look at Cuba, Venezuela, Greece, North Korea, China, Russia, any country that has a two class system of the poor and the royalist the people never win. Obama and his left wing communists (socialist) and progressive fascists have no respect for human rights, civil rights, job safety, product quality or the environment. They believe that the top elite, the corrupt and criminal have the divine right to rule the majority and that the people are there only to serve them. That is Socialism.

A dictator causes unrest among his/her own people. Keep them fighting each other so they can't fight those who are the real criminals. Every dictator and slave master (and yes the Democrats have always been the slave party and the Republicans always the Copperhead Party) knows that you attack the education, religion and the police. To become a police state first you must destroy the local police and then to bring the unrest to bay, you replace them with State Police whose loyalty is to the leader and not the law or the people. You take over the media and the education system and file the minds of the sheep with lies and anger at themselves. You destroy the religion and replace it with an occult of the state like the terrorists are doing in the Middle East.

Socialism Communism, Fascistism, Occultism are all the same. They all believe the same thing only like street gangs they each want the larger piece of the pie. They are absolute royalist. No difference in how the leaders live and rule. Even the most Communists of Communists, the little mad Emperor of North Korea lives like the worst kind of wall street capitalists. They live a rich life style while their people go poor and starve. Look at the Clinton's, Obama's and the Trump's. They all live the rich life off the money they steal from the people while they cry for more taxes, less freedom, and more power for themselves.

But it is not the system of government that is to blame, but the people. The same type of people who back these three and want us to be more like serfs of the state and not free people are the same misguided people who brought Hitler and Lenin to power. For some reason they believe that they will become part of the elite and live the life of royalty while all others are sold off into slavery. But if any of these fools were to look at what happened to the people who brought Hitler and Lenin and Mao and Castro, etc. to power they will see that they ended up at the bullet ridden walls. Dictators have no room for revolutionaries. They may get ideas.

People do not take time to study who they vote for, what each candidate stands for, who backs them, where they get their money, etc. Words mean nothing. Look at Obama. His words and his deeds never really match. From City to Federal elections you have to wonder, if this person is so good and has been around for so long while there are millions of us, and many who are better then them, including the people on this site, then why do we keep electing the same people over and over? If they were unable to keep the promise they first made when running what makes you think they can keep that same promise the 10th time you elect them?

And why do career politicians want more government, more power, more taxes (funny how they are unable to run their business with the money they already have, so they always ask for more and still more) and say look at how we can give the people free things, shinny things, a chicken in every pot, etc. And yet after they are elected and have power their socialism ideas drag the country into bankrupt and the people jobless and the country into slavery?

And you have to understand that a socialist can not be an American Constitutionist. They don't believe in the same type of government. That is why Obama and Clinton don't owe any loyalty to the people of this country. They don't believe in our system of the people running the government not the government running the people. They believe they are above the law and that the only laws are those they say. So if you want to end up like Cuba and Venezuela and Greece then put some chains on your wrist and give a bow to your little Gods.
 
l Socialism brings everyone down to a lower quality of life. period.

Which is why socialist-style countries lead in prosperity:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html

From the same timeframe, the countries with the best quality of life are, oddly enough, socialist-based:

http://www.fastcoexist.com/3021433/visualized/these-countries-have-the-best-quality-of-life-in-the-world\

Period.
 
Which is why socialist-style countries lead in prosperity:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html

From the same timeframe, the countries with the best quality of life are, oddly enough, socialist-based:

http://www.fastcoexist.com/3021433/visualized/these-countries-have-the-best-quality-of-life-in-the-world\

Period.


move there. period.

socialism is for the mentally retarded. why are you mentally retarded?
 
Which is why socialist-style countries lead in prosperity:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227334/Scandinavian-countries-list-worlds-prosperous-nations--U-S-drops-time.html

From the same timeframe, the countries with the best quality of life are, oddly enough, socialist-based:

http://www.fastcoexist.com/3021433/visualized/these-countries-have-the-best-quality-of-life-in-the-world\

Period.

How do Venezuela, Greece, North Korea and Cuba fit into that list? What was the standing of the former Soviet Union?
 
I just have a very difficult time with someone spouting out a group of people are stupid and/or ignorant (calling them retarded) when they refuse to use punctuation and proper sentence structure. Perhaps it is laziness on this person's part - I don't know. But if you're too lazy to sound like an intelligent person when making an argument, even in writing, then you're guilty of the same crime of all the alleged democrats and "socialists" - laziness.

Also, as for the comment that someone keeps voting democrat so they can get welfare, it's as ignorant as saying someone keeps voting republican because they are rich and want to protect their wealth. Ridiculous and childish stereotypes is all you have with those types of sentiments.
 
Also, as for the comment that someone keeps voting democrat so they can get welfare, it's as ignorant as saying someone keeps voting republican because they are rich and want to protect their wealth. Ridiculous and childish stereotypes is all you have with those types of sentiments.

Um, since it was my own beloved brother that said it to my face, I don't think I was 'stereo-typing' anyone... I was repeating what he said. Since I know him personally, and know he meant what he said, I can say he was certainly lazy and would rather 'party with friends' than get a job to support his family.

If that's the only reason you vote for a political party, whichever it might be, you've got a lazy outlook on things.
 
If that's the only reason you vote for a political party, whichever it might be, you've got a lazy outlook on things.

This sentiment I completely agree with. However, it was a stereotypical comment - the stereotype behind it being that only democrats endorse social programs such as welfare. Republicans are often more in favor of privately funded social programs whereas Democrats are more in favor of state/government-funded programs. Both parties do see a need for such programs.
 
Yep, stereo-typical usually means there is a basis for the comment. In other words, as you've said, Democrats like social programs. This idea of 'free money' that my brother, and others I know have, is a typical idea amongst democrats. Whereas, others understand that money comes from the hands of their hardworking neighbors. The mentality that they are entitled to said money is typical of most people who believe in socialism. I'd rather feed my neighbor than have the government take it and disburse it to lazy slackers while those who truly need help get turned away.

Just because it's stereo typical doesn't mean it isn't true.
 
Yep, stereo-typical usually means there is a basis for the comment. In other words, as you've said, Democrats like social programs. This idea of 'free money' that my brother, and others I know have, is a typical idea amongst democrats. Whereas, others understand that money comes from the hands of their hardworking neighbors. The mentality that they are entitled to said money is typical of most people who believe in socialism. I'd rather feed my neighbor than have the government take it and disburse it to lazy slackers while those who truly need help get turned away.

Just because it's stereo typical doesn't mean it isn't true.

I said both parties recognize the need for social programs, not that they like them. I also said Democrats are in favor of government-funded programs not "handing out free money."

But there is no point arguing with you - you are obviously set in your stereotypes.
 
I said both parties recognize the need for social programs, not that they like them. I also said Democrats are in favor of government-funded programs not "handing out free money."

But there is no point arguing with you - you are obviously set in your stereotypes.

Hi Fermina!!

Old people who wear depends probably take welfare. Do we know anyone like that?
 
Does Obamacare cover Depends?

And hello, lady. :rose:


Happy Friday!

We should find an expert and ask. Sometimes old people forget that they are old though. I bet we can find an expert ol'bag in this thread!!

Lets take a poll and see who has the biggest age gap from their avatar to their real age!
 
Happy Friday!

We should find an expert and ask. Sometimes old people forget that they are old though. I bet we can find an expert ol'bag in this thread!!

Lets take a poll and see who has the biggest age gap from their avatar to their real age!

No, because the trick is to get government assistance and then badmouth it so that you're not "one of them." So we'll never find someone willing to admit if Obamacare supplies Depends.
 
No, because the trick is to get government assistance and then badmouth it so that you're not "one of them." So we'll never find someone willing to admit if Obamacare supplies Depends.



Well I took a silent poll. You and I are our avatars. No age difference. I would think that women lie about their age. Maybe 10 years max. What if there was someone who had an avatar that was 35 or even 40 years younger?? That would make them...(31, 32, 33...

ANCIENT!!

You know I love conspiracy theories. I believe that we have had actual big foot sightings here!! Big foot does wear depends. The truth is out there...
 
Well I took a silent poll. You and I are our avatars. No age difference. I would think that women lie about their age. Maybe 10 years max. What if there was someone who had an avatar that was 35 or even 40 years younger?? That would make them...(31, 32, 33...

ANCIENT!!

You know I love conspiracy theories. I believe that we have had actual big foot sightings here!! Big foot does wear depends. The truth is out there...

You should join me in the conspiracy theory thread then. I think this place is dead now.
 
Well I took a silent poll. You and I are our avatars. No age difference. I would think that women lie about their age. Maybe 10 years max. What if there was someone who had an avatar that was 35 or even 40 years younger?? That would make them...(31, 32, 33...

ANCIENT!!

You know I love conspiracy theories. I believe that we have had actual big foot sightings here!! Big foot does wear depends. The truth is out there...

How do you determine the age of an AV? :confused: I don't now if I'm the oldest person here or not, but I am one of the oldest.
 
How do you determine the age of an AV? :confused: I don't now if I'm the oldest person here or not, but I am one of the oldest.

I think it was more of a reference to people hiding behind avs that are not their own or using an av of someone else and passing that person off as you.
 
How do you determine the age of an AV? :confused: I don't now if I'm the oldest person here or not, but I am one of the oldest.

You are a guy and get more distinguished with age. Women get liver spots and call them freckles.
 
Can we take that to mean you are moving to China? :rolleyes:

By that logic all the whiners who keep saying how horrible things are in this country should leave for better pastures. Right?

P.S. Speaking of handouts, go take a look at how much money Republicans hand out in the form of subsidies or tax breaks. There's a reason the M1 Abrams program hasn't been cancelled despite the military saying for a decade they no longer need it.
 
Back
Top