So, you think this memo thing has legs?

[Que]

If you get any farther into the tank for these criminals, you're going to start calling me a nigger in all caps.

You are no different than Busy in delighting in the use of that word. Rot in hell with him, you useless piece of shit.

 

[William_James]

You are no different than Busy in delighting in the use of that word. Rot in hell with him, you useless piece of shit.

Are you willing to call out AJ for the same infraction?

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1384764

 

[HisArpy]

I’m curious as to whom else here believes that the Russians did not hack the emails?

If you mean the DNC email server - I don't. They may have come along later but the leaks were obviously an inside job.

This says nothing about H's emails and the fiasco that went along with those. You know there was something there there by the hullabaloo that she and everyone else from the State Dept/FBI/DOJ raised as soon as someone wanted them. That we didn't get them only means that they were more successful in hiding them that we were at getting to them before they were destroyed.

And, it says nothing about the texts between Strzok and Page. Or the BS dossier. Or the fact that the FBI Director HIMSELF was leaking classified information. Or that these Gov Depts weren't even releasing the information to the oversight committees. And, when pressed by additional investigation, suddenly those items went missing too.

It's all too coincidental. To pat. To well played too often.

What's the most obvious thing about in this mess is that it's the same players time and time again no matter where you look. And, as a result of the closer scrutiny BECAUSE of all the BS that's been going on, hidden players are also now being revealed. And, all of them seem to be using the same bag of dirty tricks. Tricks that no one is falling for any longer.

 

[Sean]

If you mean the DNC email server - I don't. They may have come along later but the leaks were obviously an inside job.

This says nothing about H's emails and the fiasco that went along with those. You know there was something there there by the hullabaloo that she and everyone else from the State Dept/FBI/DOJ raised as soon as someone wanted them. That we didn't get them only means that they were more successful in hiding them that we were at getting to them before they were destroyed.

And, it says nothing about the texts between Strzok and Page. Or the BS dossier. Or the fact that the FBI Director HIMSELF was leaking classified information. Or that these Gov Depts weren't even releasing the information to the oversight committees. And, when pressed by additional investigation, suddenly those items went missing too.

It's all too coincidental. To pat. To well played too often.

What's the most obvious thing about in this mess is that it's the same players time and time again no matter where you look. And, as a result of the closer scrutiny BECAUSE of all the BS that's been going on, hidden players are also now being revealed. And, all of them seem to be using the same bag of dirty tricks. Tricks that no one is falling for any longer.

Well, case closed then. Tim knows this stuff.

 

[Luk]

Are you willing to call out AJ for the same infraction?

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1384764

Poor little guy. Off board bromance fail.

 

[Que]

Are you willing to call out AJ and myself for the same infraction?

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1384764

Of course. You are both debased by using it, Bobs. But you knew that.

I've noticed it seems to trip of your tongue much more easilly, though. Must be your racist Georgia roots.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Someone's rather testy.

 

[BobBalouski]

No matter how much one sincerely wishes to compromise for the positive general welfare of all, or even simply for the sake of common politeness and kindness, if the same one practical believes in any absolute truth, like human life can only be human life, and any other party seriously rejects outright such unarguable, absolute truths...

No matter the determined politeness, no matter the efforted kindness, no matter how sincerely one wishes to just get along, that unbridgeable chasm of basic human honesty (which is just as unarguably fundamental for any meaningful discussion about anything to ever occur at all), that reality will always dismiss every desire besides it.

It is not possible to have honest discussion to any degree with someone who denies truth. And, just to remind you, even when you imagine your sincere efforts may have won some good side with them, their evil disdain for truth can instantly turn into the very dagger they'll use to remind you who they truly are.

 

[coati]

The question posed by this thread was, "So, you think this memo thing has legs?"

It turns out that yes, it does have legs. It has revealed who wants to make a preemptive strike on the Mueller investigation, and who is willing to simply let the findings of the Mueller investigation speak for themselves.

And, it has defined these two groups both in the halls of government and in two-bit forums like the GB.

 

[Luk]

No matter how much one sincerely wishes to compromise for the positive general welfare of all, or even simply for the sake of common politeness and kindness, if the same one practical believes in any absolute truth, like human life can only be human life, and any other party seriously rejects outright such unarguable, absolute truths...

No matter the determined politeness, no matter the efforted kindness, no matter how sincerely one wishes to just get along, that unbridgeable chasm of basic human honesty (which is just as unarguably fundamental for any meaningful discussion about anything to ever occur at all), that reality will always dismiss every desire besides it.

It is not possible to have honest discussion to any degree with someone who denies truth. And, just to remind you, even when you imagine your sincere efforts may have won some good side with them, their evil disdain for truth can instantly turn into the very dagger they'll use to remind you who they truly are.

That makes sense and now we see why you ejected from the conversation yesterday when I called your bullshit.

 

[BobaFetaCheese]

I'm not super political and not a major news junkie or anything but in the last couple days I haven't seen anything on Fox News or CNN about the memo. They got stuck on the texts for 5 minutes then this wife beating asshole comes along. Just saying.

 

[Que]

That makes sense and now we see why you ejected from the conversation yesterday when I called your bullshit.

You were engaged in actual conversation? Link?

 

[Que]

The question posed by this thread was, "So, you think this memo thing has legs?"

It turns out that yes, it does have legs. It has revealed who wants to make a preemptive strike on the Mueller investigation, and who is willing to simply let the findings of the Mueller investigation speak for themselves.

And, it has defined these two groups both in the halls of government and in two-bit forums like the GB.

It does separate the world into two camps, but not at all as you suggest.

It is those that are looking for the truth, some of whom hope that helps their particular cause vs those that would rather obfuscate. Such as yourself.

Trey Gowdy who is responsible for the legal analysis thst resulted in the memo's content specifically said it has no meaning or bearing with regards to Mueller's investigation.

You seem rather troubled by information coming to light. Why is that?

 

[Luk]

You were engaged in actual conversation? Link?

I'm not apologizing for being able to make my points in a few sentences rather than the 6 paragraphs of circular bullshit that it takes you. That's been pointed out to you multiple times just today.

 

[Que]

I'm not apologizing for being able to make my points in a few sentences rather than the 6 paragraphs of circular bullshit that it takes you. That's been pointed out to you multiple times just today.

That's an awful lot of words to display your ignorance about what a conversation is or isn't. Here's a hint it has nothing to do with the number of words exchanged.

Not really my problem that my word count exacerbates your feelings of intellectual inferiority. You're going to just have to deal with those on your own.

In case you're wondering, this little exchange between you and I just now is not an actual conversation.

 

[Luk]

That's an awful lot of words to display your ignorance about what a conversation is or isn't. Here's a hint it has nothing to do with the number of words exchanged.

Not really my problem that my word count exacerbates your feelings of intellectual inferiority. You're going to just have to deal with those on your own.

In case you're wondering, this little exchange between you and I just now is not an actual conversation.

Inferior to WHAT? You're as intellectual as 45 on a bender. It's just hilarious to watch you think anyone would feel inferior to you about anything.

 

[BobBalouski]

Trey Gowdy...

Didn't even take him 4 full terms (8 years) to figure-out statist federal government partisan politics are nothing more useful than the gigantic pile of corrupt crap they are. He's says his most serving place is in the law, not politics - and he means it. Lindsey Graham offered him a federal district judgeship (4th, I think) - he said, no thanks. Asked what he'd say to whomever is President 10 years from now if that Chief Executive nominated him to the Supreme Court, he says he'll happy offer to compile a list of whom he thinks would rule best, without his name on it at all. He relates how corrupt, partisan politics has infected every level of federal government and he wants no more repugnant taste of it at all.

I believe 2 things could begin turning around this nation almost immediately: 1) enough patriots quit financing statist federal government; 2) enough patriots resign from statist federal government and pronounce to the rest of America exactly why they did.

Those two things would definitely get peoples' attention - without any physical aggression of any kind.

BTW: you probably shouldn't point out to Vermina Dunza's latest toilet deposit, since it's so wannabe smug in fantasizing it's so naturally superior to you at this low bowl point of its life, that it's simply "You're", not "Your".

 

[William_James]

Of course. You are both debased by using it, Bobs. But you knew that.

I've noticed it seems to trip of your tongue much more easilly, though. Must be your racist Georgia roots.

So AJ is a "useless piece of shit."

It's nice to see some moral clarity from you.

 

[cowslinger64]

That's an awful lot of words to display your ignorance about what a conversation is or isn't. Here's a hint it has nothing to do with the number of words exchanged.

Not really my problem that my word count exacerbates your feelings of intellectual inferiority. You're going to just have to deal with those on your own.

In case you're wondering, this little exchange between you and I just now is not an actual conversation.

Are you botanydummys alt, or is he your alt? No way both of you are real humans.

 

[Hypoxia]

blah blah statist federal government blah blah

You realize that the purpose of a gov't is to maintain a state, right? ANY gov't is by definition statist. It's like a harmonica is inherently musical even if you aren't.

Don't eat the pizza.

(That's an Alex Jones reference. Just in case you didn't catch it.)

BTW be careful with this anti-statist stuff. They used to hang anarchists.

 

[Que]

Inferior to WHAT? You're as intellectual as 45 on a bender. It's just hilarious to watch you think anyone would feel inferior to you about anything.

You certainly sound bemused.

I'm curious. How do you watch someone think?

 

[mark_j]

We're not talking about Benghazi, do keep up.

I wasn't talking about Benghazi either.. So why don't you fuck off...

 

[WoundedKnee]

That's an awful lot of words to display your ignorance about what a conversation is or isn't. Here's a hint it has nothing to do with the number of words exchanged.

Not really my problem that my word count exacerbates your feelings of intellectual inferiority. You're going to just have to deal with those on your own.

In case you're wondering, this little exchange between you and I just now is not an actual conversation.

They're paranoid over the idea that Mueller has to keep going because he's going to get something and he's going to take Trump out. All of their hopes and dreams are now thrown into that basket. If he doesn't get Trump and nail him to the wall, then he will be the most hated man in the nation.

 

[cowslinger64]

They're paranoid over the idea that Mueller has to keep going because he's going to get something and he's going to take Trump out. All of their hopes and dreams are now thrown into that basket. If he doesn't get Trump and nail him to the wall, then he will be the most hated man in the nation.

Of course that's a buncha crap. The left isn't paranoid about this.. It's an ongoing investigation and thorough one too.. That takes time. Mueller is NOT a Democrat. You whackadoodles seem to constantly forget that.

Personally, I think the chances are good they will nail Trump. And for the first time in his life, he'll get his comeuppance. But, if they don't find anything on him and the investigation is allowed to continue without outside interference.. Then that's fine. It needed to be done. If they catch others in the snare, including Hillary, that's fine too..

For a group of unemployed, disabled morons.. You sure "know a lot".

 

[Aglaopheme]

One of these things is not like the other.

Trump's sudden concern for properly classified material and the views of Justice and the FBI is rich considering his handling of the Nunes memo. In that case, recall, he promised to declassify before he had read it; in that case, FBI Director Christopher Wray issued a rare public statement expressing "grave concerns" about the memo; in that case, White House spokesman Raj Shah told CNN that "the Department of Justice doesn't have a role in this process." Nevertheless, Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein made a last-ditch appeal to White House Chief of Staff John Kelly and were ignored. The memo was released, scoring a victory for febrile right-wing Trump boosters and Russian bots. "The memo totally vindicates 'Trump' in probe," the president triumphantly tweeted the next day. (No, it really didn't.)

In this case, by contrast, Trump made a show of meeting with Wray and a senior Justice Department official – apparently this time they did have a role – to consider whether to release the Democrats' memo. This time he's deeply concerned about hastily or improperly declassifying the memo.

https://www.usnews.com/opinion/thom...wont-declassify-democrats-nunes-memo-rebuttal