starrkers
Down two, then left
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2006
- Posts
- 10,427
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, he probably could, but only one of them.
Yep, he probably could, but only one of them.
Other actors/directors thought the same, and eventually tried to prove it by making "meaningful" movies -- often as their last movies.
He's speaking to women, Harold, not to you and me. Jayne Mansfield could have said the same thing to men in the sixties, and she's have been right too.![]()
Nope, wrong again. He's an amazing actor, and that speaks to both men and women.
Nope, wrong again. He's an amazing actor, and that speaks to both men and women. It doesn't have anything to do with his looks, not for me.
Nope, wrong again. He's an amazing actor, and that speaks to both men and women. It doesn't have anything to do with his looks, not for me.
So what does that make Harold?[/COLOR]
However, in the sixties, I would have been avid to see Jayne Mansfield doing such a movie, especially if she was doing it nude.
That's the interesting thing about Depp-- he doesn't make stinkers. Oh, except for "The Astronaut's Wife", that was pretty smelly. So is "The Ninth Gate" unless you're a horror fan and love those cliches...Exactly: I don't find JD particularly atractive, but he is an incredible actor who can make you forget he's acting. He's good enough that he very nearly made Edward Scissorhands and Gilbert Grape popular successes as well as artistic statements.
Like I said, he could make ONE stinker without losing his fan base, but they'd be "once bitten, twice shy" if he tried to pull it off twice.
And he's made movies that would have been stinkers except that he was in them, like "Don Juan De Marco", and "Sweeny Todd" for goddsake.![]()
That's the interesting thing about Depp-- he doesn't make stinkers. Oh, except for "The Astronaut's Wife", that was pretty smelly. So is "The Ninth Gate" unless you're a horror fan and love those cliches...
he's made movies you've never heard of, though, like Arizona Dream, and "The Brave", or "Before Night Falls". And he's made movies that would have been stinkers except that he was in them, like "Don Juan De Marco", and "Sweeny Todd" for goddsake.![]()
Exactly: I don't find JD particularly atractive, but he is an incredible actor who can make you forget he's acting. He's good enough that he very nearly made Edward Scissorhands and Gilbert Grape popular successes as well as artistic statements. :rolleyes
(snip)
Box, I did go see movies because of purported near-nudity of actresses like Brigittte Bardot, Jayne Mansfield, Marilyn Monroe, or Rachael Welsh: I was uniformly disappointed with the amount of bad movie I had to sit through to get to the "artistic nudity" and the "artistic nudity" when it did appear -- if I hadn't been bored into a stupor so that I missed it entirely.
I was going to use Sweeny Todd as an example of something of his that I will never see even with him in it. I don't care for the subject matter or the fact that it is a musical. It's on my "will not watch" list as is evident by me avoiding it on cable all this month.
...he doesn't make stinkers. Oh, except for "The Astronaut's Wife", that was pretty smelly. So is "The Ninth Gate" unless you're a horror fan and love those cliches...
I'd say he doesn't play bad roles -- every character he plays, he plays the best it can be played; thus saving some otherwise horrible movies.
The implication ot the original caption, though, is that he could "mail-in" a performance and his fans would go watch it and forgive him for it. He's not the type to "take a movie or two off" but he could once -- or maybe more often if he doesn't try to make them back-to-back.
If he ever gives up on that all-out performance for every character, his fan base will dwindle to a few hormone-driven women with no artistic sensibilities -- the female equivalents of Boxlicker in the sixties.![]()
I thought the implication was that he could make that movie and make it worth watching, because he never "mails in" a performance.I'd say he doesn't play bad roles -- every character he plays, he plays the best it can be played; thus saving some otherwise horrible movies.
The implication ot the original caption, though, is that he could "mail-in" a performance and his fans would go watch it and forgive him for it. He's not the type to "take a movie or two off" but he could once -- or maybe more often if he doesn't try to make them back-to-back.
Brando in "Don Juan De Marco," perhaps? And, perhaps, that performance will be in support of some young fireball of an actor, to whom he's passing the torch.If he ever gives up on that all-out performance for every character, his fan base will dwindle to a few hormone-driven women with no artistic sensibilities -- the female equivalents of Boxlicker in the sixties.![]()
That was my take on it as well.I thought the implication was that he could make that movie and make it worth watching, because he never "mails in" a performance.
I thought the implication was that he could make that movie and make it worth watching...
That was my take on it as well.
I watched it on Monday after swearing I wouldn't ever see it. Johnny Depp can sing, too. He made the movie good, but the ending was very disturbing.![]()