So I guess the AH isn't as intelligent as I thought.

[Le Jacquelope]

Just like the General Board, this place is packed with people who completely do not comprehend the clearest written English, who go totally off topic and attack you based on stuff you didn't write, and spout "principles" that every day people would totally consider to be crazy. Principles you don't even hear people espousing because it's so ridiculous.


It is logically impossible for

Okay, so who wants to get rid of the FDIC?
And if the FDIC didn't exist, how would we help people like Debbie Ingham who had $120,000 in the bank before this Andrew McCain (adopted son of John McCain)-run bank shut down? She participated with good faith in the market, and now $20,000 of her hard earned money is gone.

Libertarians would have abolished the FDIC and Debbie Ingham would have lost all $120,000 of her money.

to mean the answer is "Well, anyone who doesn't know by now that only the first 100K is issued by the FDIC, should know better."

Totally impossible. It's off topic.

But somehow that's how things get taken.

The answer is, "Well, if the FDIC didn't exist, none of that $100K is covered at all."


I'd love to get you guys from behind that computer screen in front of a college podium and watch you respond to THAT opening statement with THAT response.

Phew.

 

[starrkers]

Oh for heaven's sake. Three of the first four responses to that train wreck of a thread answered your convoluted question.

Give it a break already.

 

[sr71plt]

attack you based on stuff you didn't write

Good point. Now back to that question I keep asking and you won't respond directly to:

Show me specifically where I said the FDIC is for idiots--or where I said a single negative thing about the FDIC system.

 

[starrkers]

How is

"Well, if the FDIC didn't exist, none of that $100K is covered at all."

the answer to

Okay, so who wants to get rid of the FDIC?

which is the only question posed in your original quoted section.

 

[3113]

So I guess the AH isn't as intelligent as I thought.

How intelligent did you think it was? Or want it to be? I'll work up an I.Q. test for all authors to pass before they can post--but you'll have to take it also, and I'm gonna make it really, really hard

 

[Le Jacquelope]

How intelligent did you think it was? Or want it to be? I'll work up an I.Q. test for all authors to pass before they can post--but you'll have to take it also, and I'm gonna make it really, really hard

Oh Lord... bring that bad boy on.

I test too damned well. I passed my series 7 with plenty of room to spare.

You'd be better off hitting me by surprise with real world puzzles, face to face. Much better tests of intelligence there. Quick on your feet stuff handicaps me because I'm a contemplative kinda guy, which is why I've been pushing that angle as of late.

 

[sr71plt]

Just stay away from anything requiring common sense.

 

[3113]

Just stay away from anything requiring common sense.

Hey, Mister, this isn't going to be any sort of namby-pamby I.Q. test where you get out of a maze or compare shapes to one another or even talk common sense. I'm talking essay and reading comprehension! I'm talking obscure vocabulary. I'm talking calculus and geometry problems relevant to the forum! For example:

"When engaging in a classic 69' position with a 1.8 meter female (91 centimeters of which are leg) and a 1.6 meter male (60 centimeters of which are leg) with a slong 304 centimeters in length, what degree of angle would be optimal for the woman in order to deep throat the man while he brings her to orgasm?"

See? Not so simple!

 

[sr71plt]

Hey, Mister, this isn't going to be any sort of namby-pamby I.Q. test where you get out of a maze or compare shapes to one another or even talk common sense. I'm talking essay and reading comprehension! I'm talking obscure vocabulary. I'm talking calculus and geometry problems relevant to the forum! For example:

"When engaging in a classic 69' position with a 1.8 meter female (91 centimeters of which are leg) and a 1.6 meter male (60 centimeters of which are leg) with a slong 304 centimeters in length, what degree of angle would be optimal for the woman in order to deep throat the man while he brings her to orgasm?"

See? Not so simple!

You lost me at calculus. But for some reason, I understood the example clearly.

 

[3113]

You lost me at calculus. But for some reason, I understood the example clearly.

Well, I'm a very good teacher. [preen] I know how to make these things relevant and interesting to students.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Hey, Mister, this isn't going to be any sort of namby-pamby I.Q. test where you get out of a maze or compare shapes to one another or even talk common sense. I'm talking essay and reading comprehension! I'm talking obscure vocabulary. I'm talking calculus and geometry problems relevant to the forum! For example:

"When engaging in a classic 69' position with a 1.8 meter female (91 centimeters of which are leg) and a 1.6 meter male (60 centimeters of which are leg) with a slong 304 centimeters in length, what degree of angle would be optimal for the woman in order to deep throat the man while he brings her to orgasm?"

See? Not so simple!

He CAN'T. With a 304 centimeter dick, he's about 9 feet AWAY from her when she deep throats him. He can't even get close in any direction unless he can roll that sucker up. Which ain't likely if she's deep throating him.

Then again she could be straddling his dick like a log and rubbing herself along its length while bending down to deep throat. She'd have to bend her neck like crazy though.

 

[Vermilion]

Well, I'm a very good teacher. [preen] I know how to make these things relevant and interesting to students.

psst, 3113 - I think you're gonna have to include some kind of sense-of-humour measurement in that test...

x
V

 

[Just-Legal]

psst, 3113 - I think you're gonna have to include some kind of sense-of-humour measurement in that test...

x
V

Agreed.

 

[Safe_Bet]

He CAN'T. With a 304 centimeter dick, he's about 9 feet AWAY from her when she deep throats him. He can't even get close in any direction unless he can roll that sucker up. Which ain't likely if she's deep throating him.

Then again she could be straddling his dick like a log and rubbing herself along its length while bending down to deep throat. She'd have to bend her neck like crazy though.

I'd pass the sense-of-humour measurement part. I think it's funny as hell that it took him 20 minutes to come up with his response. I can just see him working away to figure out the CORRECT answer.

 

[neonlyte]

I'd pass the sense-of-humour measurement part. I think think it's funny as hell that it took him 20 minutes to come up with his response. I can just see him working away to figure out the CORRECT answer.

With all that 'rubbing along its length', I'm guessing he used a slide rule Dead give away on age

 

[Remec]

"When engaging in a classic 69' position with a 1.8 meter female (91 centimeters of which are leg) and a 1.6 meter male (60 centimeters of which are leg) with a slong 304 centimeters in length, what degree of angle would be optimal for the woman in order to deep throat the man while he brings her to orgasm?"

See? Not so simple!

Clarification please, *raising hand*

Should I assume he is bringing her to orgasm strictly through oral methods, or is possible to factor in the use of fingers or a toy, thus altering the attitude of her body in relation to his?

 

[jomar]

"When engaging in a classic 69' position with a 1.8 meter female (91 centimeters of which are leg) and a 1.6 meter male (60 centimeters of which are leg) with a slong 304 centimeters in length, what degree of angle would be optimal for the woman in order to deep throat the man while he brings her to orgasm?"

See? Not so simple!

Actually, very simple and asks two questions. The answers are, of course, a Guinness World Record, and a huge signing bonus for his porn contract.

Unless you're implying alien sex and bestiality here, and I know you wouldn't do that because no proper teacher would suggest placing such things ahead of family values. Not even in moose crazy Alaska where they have those funny lights in the sky.

 

[SweetWitch]

Aw, you guys are being mean to poor LJ. Stop. Don't you see he's hurting inside? Every since kindergarten he's been saddled with a serious handicap, an inability to understand or have empathy for anyone who isn't him. Have pity on the poor boy. He needs our sympathy.

 

[trysail]

...my series 7...

Ahhh. That explains everything. What we've got here is a stock jobber.

 

[Emerald_Dragon]

BWAAAAAAAAAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAA

You guys crack me up!!

 

[redpaint]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v291/willow47501/assholes-N-%20kackasses/sucks.gif

 

[Selena_Kitt]

people who completely do not comprehend the clearest written English, who go totally off topic and attack you based on stuff you didn't write, and spout "principles" that every day people would totally consider to be crazy. Principles you don't even hear people espousing because it's so ridiculous.

You need a mirror.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

With all that 'rubbing along its length', I'm guessing he used a slide rule Dead give away on age

I think it's funny as hell that Safe Bet has taken hours to figure out how to put me on ignore after announcing that I'm on ignore. But I guess that one slipped by ya, right?

 

[Safe_Bet]

I think it's funny as hell that Safe Bet has taken hours to figure out how to put me on ignore after announcing that I'm on ignore. But I guess that one slipped by ya, right?

Nope, LJ. You got your facts wrong again (am I sensing a trend here?).

"Ignoring you" is different that putting you on "ignore." I'd never put you on Ignore. If I'm in the right mood, your crap is funny as hell. Read you posts is better than watching the monkeys at the zoo. (of course real monkeys are smarter and have their facts right before THEY start poo fights).

 

[3113]

Clarification please, *raising hand*

Should I assume he is bringing her to orgasm strictly through oral methods, or is possible to factor in the use of fingers or a toy, thus altering the attitude of her body in relation to his?

Oh, very good Remec! You get extra points for that excellent intellectual question. That's going to help you gain a much larger post quotient.

For this question oral methods only. However, for question 87b you can presume the use of other methods. That's the one where the man is hanging from the ceiling, swinging like a foucault pendulum's and knocking down pegs in between trying to stimulate the woman.

Remember, everyone, number two pencils and no using calculators.