SamScribble
Yeah, still just a guru
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2009
- Posts
- 38,862
Here in Somewhere-Out-There, one of the TV channels is currently hyping a forthcoming documentary series as ‘a truly amazing and astounding revelation over three fantastic weeks’.
If you happen to be the executive responsible for commissioning or purchasing the show then, yes, you might possibly hold the view that the show is ‘amazing and astounding’. (Although I very much doubt that it is.) But claiming foreknowledge that three weeks – 21 days, somewhere in the future – are going to be ‘fantastic’ seems more than a little over the top.
Mind you, this is the same TV channel that began a recent sports bulletin with a reporter standing in the middle of an empty sports field saying: ‘Standing here today, the late Fred Smith seems like a giant of the game’. I suppose it’s possible that the reporter could see dead Fred standing there. But I certainly couldn’t see dead Fred on my screen.
Other channels are just as bad. If not worse. One channel labels every second news item as ‘exclusive’, even though ‘our reporter’ – who always seems to be ‘across the story’(whatever that means) – is generally shown reporting from some sort of press conference at which there are at least a couple of dozen other reporters. Clearly, exclusivity is not what it once was.
Am I being picky here? Am I the only reader/listener/viewer who is fed up with the increasingly-sloppy writing of the 24/7 news media?
If you happen to be the executive responsible for commissioning or purchasing the show then, yes, you might possibly hold the view that the show is ‘amazing and astounding’. (Although I very much doubt that it is.) But claiming foreknowledge that three weeks – 21 days, somewhere in the future – are going to be ‘fantastic’ seems more than a little over the top.
Mind you, this is the same TV channel that began a recent sports bulletin with a reporter standing in the middle of an empty sports field saying: ‘Standing here today, the late Fred Smith seems like a giant of the game’. I suppose it’s possible that the reporter could see dead Fred standing there. But I certainly couldn’t see dead Fred on my screen.
Other channels are just as bad. If not worse. One channel labels every second news item as ‘exclusive’, even though ‘our reporter’ – who always seems to be ‘across the story’(whatever that means) – is generally shown reporting from some sort of press conference at which there are at least a couple of dozen other reporters. Clearly, exclusivity is not what it once was.
Am I being picky here? Am I the only reader/listener/viewer who is fed up with the increasingly-sloppy writing of the 24/7 news media?