Slippery Dope, You were RIGHT!
- Thread starter Busybody
- Start date
hssh345Alt
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2015
- Posts
- 395
??
Is that a code for "Hey assholes, come and troll me"
or is it in reference to some news or article ?
Is that a code for "Hey assholes, come and troll me"
or is it in reference to some news or article ?
Recidiva
Harastal
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Posts
- 89,726
when he gets over his SHOCK that he was finally right abut something
Tell him to c'mere, Will you, Mrs Slippery Dope?
No.
You want me in a loop you tell me something useful!
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Recidiva
Harastal
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Posts
- 89,726
have I ever said anything useful?
why would I start NOW????????
At least entertaining!
Dammit man, I've got time to waste elsewhere!
I'm not saying coyly "Oooh, busybody has something to say to you"
Nuh uh.
Not when it's boring!
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Well, after the Iran sellout deal was signed
and REPOZ were against
Ole Slippery Dope screamed HOW CAN THEY BE AGAINST, they didnt see the deal
I said sure they did, its OUT THERE
He axed for a LINK, I provided,
He disappeared, of course,
Cause he was wrong
AS USUAL
Well it turns out, HE WAS RIGHT....they didnt see teh WHOLE deal, cause Hussein (half)Black Obama is hiding it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Obama cut separate deals with Iran over Parchin and military nukes, hid deals from Congress
Congressman Mike Pompeo (R-Ks) and Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark) have been told by the IAEA at a meeting in Vienna on Friday that President Hussein Obama cut separate deals with Iran over its Parchin military complex (you know, the one they won't show to the IAEA) and its military nuclear program, and then hid the deals from Congress.
“According to the IAEA, the Iran agreement negotiators, including the Obama administration, agreed that the IAEA and Iran would forge separate arrangements to govern the inspection of the Parchin military complex – one of the most secretive military facilities in Iran – and how Iran would satisfy the IAEA’s outstanding questions regarding past weaponization work. Both arrangements will not be vetted by any organization other than Iran and the IAEA, and will not be released even to the nations that negotiated the JCPOA. This means that the secret arrangements have not been released for public scrutiny and have not been submitted to Congress as part of its legislatively mandated review of the Iran deal.”
The American public has not been given all the facts on the Iran deal, nor has congress. This is not only distressing but a violation:
“Even under the woefully inadequate Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, the Obama administration is required to provide the U.S. Congress with all nuclear agreement documents, including all “annexes, appendices, codicils, side agreements, implementing materials, documents, and guidance, technical or other understandings and any related agreements, whether entered into or implemented prior to the agreement or to be entered into or implemented in the future.”
Both Pompeo and Cotton are U.S. military veterans. Each of them included a personal statement in the press release:
and REPOZ were against
Ole Slippery Dope screamed HOW CAN THEY BE AGAINST, they didnt see the deal
I said sure they did, its OUT THERE
He axed for a LINK, I provided,
He disappeared, of course,
Cause he was wrong
AS USUAL
Well it turns out, HE WAS RIGHT....they didnt see teh WHOLE deal, cause Hussein (half)Black Obama is hiding it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Obama cut separate deals with Iran over Parchin and military nukes, hid deals from Congress
Congressman Mike Pompeo (R-Ks) and Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark) have been told by the IAEA at a meeting in Vienna on Friday that President Hussein Obama cut separate deals with Iran over its Parchin military complex (you know, the one they won't show to the IAEA) and its military nuclear program, and then hid the deals from Congress.
“According to the IAEA, the Iran agreement negotiators, including the Obama administration, agreed that the IAEA and Iran would forge separate arrangements to govern the inspection of the Parchin military complex – one of the most secretive military facilities in Iran – and how Iran would satisfy the IAEA’s outstanding questions regarding past weaponization work. Both arrangements will not be vetted by any organization other than Iran and the IAEA, and will not be released even to the nations that negotiated the JCPOA. This means that the secret arrangements have not been released for public scrutiny and have not been submitted to Congress as part of its legislatively mandated review of the Iran deal.”
The American public has not been given all the facts on the Iran deal, nor has congress. This is not only distressing but a violation:
“Even under the woefully inadequate Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, the Obama administration is required to provide the U.S. Congress with all nuclear agreement documents, including all “annexes, appendices, codicils, side agreements, implementing materials, documents, and guidance, technical or other understandings and any related agreements, whether entered into or implemented prior to the agreement or to be entered into or implemented in the future.”
Both Pompeo and Cotton are U.S. military veterans. Each of them included a personal statement in the press release:
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
I am never boring
I am always entertaining
You musta gotten me confused with
He whose name must not be said, Aka, Slippery Dope
Recidiva
Harastal
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Posts
- 89,726
you did tell him to IGNORE me
yrs ago
remember?
This is often our conversation regarding Lit:
"Asshole online said this ridiculous thing"
"Isn't that how they usually act? How can you be surprised?"
Though first I have to get him to narrow down 'asshole' for me.
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Recidiva
Harastal
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Posts
- 89,726
so a criminal with a gun is the same a LE with a gun?
No, I'm saying that cat is so far away from the bag it is never going back in.
Genie far from bottle.
Nuclear arms on sovereign soil are the best way to prevent invasion. EVERYONE WANTS ONE.
There's no real way to prevent it.
phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
Did you read the statement from ISIS on the Iran deal?
http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/Possible_Military_Dimensions_Final.pdf
http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/Possible_Military_Dimensions_Final.pdf
Ulaven_Demorte
Non-Prophet Organization
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2006
- Posts
- 30,016
Congrats
You will learn to get used to admitting that I'm right.
Your slanted article, is bullshit, I'm right about that too, just wait.
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
You will learn to get used to admitting that I'm right.
Your slanted article, is bullshit, I'm right about that too, just wait.
well of course CupCake, you would say that
Ulaven_Demorte
Non-Prophet Organization
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2006
- Posts
- 30,016
well of course CupCake, you would say that
Any source that refers to the President by only his middle and last
name instead of President Obama can be safely dismissed as bullshit.
Your welcome.
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Despite Slippery Dope shouts of MISLEADING....despite his pretense of ITA AINT SO
It is so, the NIGGER HOUSE didnt provide, in fact HID parts of the agreement
IRAN DEAL IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE: So says Andrew McCarthy in his latest NRO post.
The president “must certainly be punishable for giving false information to the Senate.” One can imagine hearing such counsel from a contemporary United States senator on the receiving end of President Obama’s “full disclosure” of the nuclear deal with Iran. But the admonition actually came from James Iredell, a champion of the Constitution’s ratification, who was later appointed to the Supreme Court by President George Washington.
Iredell was addressing the obligations the new Constitution imposed on the president in the arena of international affairs. Notwithstanding the chief executive’s broad powers to “regulate all intercourse with foreign powers,” it would be the president’s “duty to impart to the Senate every material intelligence he receives.” Indeed, among the most egregious offenses a president could commit would be fraudulently inducing senators “to enter into measures injurious to their country, and which they would not have consented to had the true state of things been disclosed to them.” . . .
After a few days of misdirection, administration officials now admit that there are “side deals” that the administration has not revealed to Congress and does not intend to make public. So far, we know of two “side deals” — who knows how many more there may actually be? As the Center for Security Policy’s Fred Fleitz writes in National Review, they involve (a) a full accounting of Iran’s prior nuclear activities (many of which are believed to have been in blatant violation of international law) and (b) access to the Parchin military base, where Iran has conducted explosive testing related to nuclear missiles. . . .
Now consider this: Under cover of this IAEA ruse, Obama ran to the Security Council and rammed through a resolution commencing implementation of his Iran deal before Congress or the American people could consider it. He thus undermined American sovereignty and the Constitution by scheming to impose an international-law fait accompli. And he thus undermined American national security by transferring his inspection commitments to an international agency that he knows is not close to being capable of executing them — an agency that will be further hampered by notice restrictions that, as Charles Krauthammer concludes, render the inspections “farcical” in any event.
The Constitution forbids providing aid and comfort to America’s enemies. And the Framers’ notion that a president would be punishable for deceiving Congress regarding the conduct of foreign affairs meant that lawmakers would be obliged to use their constitutional powers to protect the United States — not merely shriek on cable television as if they were powerless spectators.
Well?
McCarthy’s right, of course. But as his ending query reveals, no one realistically expects the Republican establishment to call for impeachment, despite the fact that the House GOP could issue articles of impeachment with a simple majority vote, sending the case to the Senate for conviction (which would require 2/3 supermajority).
Why not? Because the GOP leadership has given up, and like a jilted lover, is trying so hard to “look the other way” that it no longer sees the obvious, and has lost all self-confidence in its own power, and the power of the truth. It also is betting the farm–i.e., the country–that the U.S. can survive another 18 months of an Obama presidency, and that the next (hopefully) GOP President can magically “cure” all of the Obama-induced cancers. It’s a risky and stupid gamble.
It is so, the NIGGER HOUSE didnt provide, in fact HID parts of the agreement
IRAN DEAL IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE: So says Andrew McCarthy in his latest NRO post.
The president “must certainly be punishable for giving false information to the Senate.” One can imagine hearing such counsel from a contemporary United States senator on the receiving end of President Obama’s “full disclosure” of the nuclear deal with Iran. But the admonition actually came from James Iredell, a champion of the Constitution’s ratification, who was later appointed to the Supreme Court by President George Washington.
Iredell was addressing the obligations the new Constitution imposed on the president in the arena of international affairs. Notwithstanding the chief executive’s broad powers to “regulate all intercourse with foreign powers,” it would be the president’s “duty to impart to the Senate every material intelligence he receives.” Indeed, among the most egregious offenses a president could commit would be fraudulently inducing senators “to enter into measures injurious to their country, and which they would not have consented to had the true state of things been disclosed to them.” . . .
After a few days of misdirection, administration officials now admit that there are “side deals” that the administration has not revealed to Congress and does not intend to make public. So far, we know of two “side deals” — who knows how many more there may actually be? As the Center for Security Policy’s Fred Fleitz writes in National Review, they involve (a) a full accounting of Iran’s prior nuclear activities (many of which are believed to have been in blatant violation of international law) and (b) access to the Parchin military base, where Iran has conducted explosive testing related to nuclear missiles. . . .
Now consider this: Under cover of this IAEA ruse, Obama ran to the Security Council and rammed through a resolution commencing implementation of his Iran deal before Congress or the American people could consider it. He thus undermined American sovereignty and the Constitution by scheming to impose an international-law fait accompli. And he thus undermined American national security by transferring his inspection commitments to an international agency that he knows is not close to being capable of executing them — an agency that will be further hampered by notice restrictions that, as Charles Krauthammer concludes, render the inspections “farcical” in any event.
The Constitution forbids providing aid and comfort to America’s enemies. And the Framers’ notion that a president would be punishable for deceiving Congress regarding the conduct of foreign affairs meant that lawmakers would be obliged to use their constitutional powers to protect the United States — not merely shriek on cable television as if they were powerless spectators.
Well?
McCarthy’s right, of course. But as his ending query reveals, no one realistically expects the Republican establishment to call for impeachment, despite the fact that the House GOP could issue articles of impeachment with a simple majority vote, sending the case to the Senate for conviction (which would require 2/3 supermajority).
Why not? Because the GOP leadership has given up, and like a jilted lover, is trying so hard to “look the other way” that it no longer sees the obvious, and has lost all self-confidence in its own power, and the power of the truth. It also is betting the farm–i.e., the country–that the U.S. can survive another 18 months of an Obama presidency, and that the next (hopefully) GOP President can magically “cure” all of the Obama-induced cancers. It’s a risky and stupid gamble.
Ulaven_Demorte
Non-Prophet Organization
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2006
- Posts
- 30,016
If these "secret" side deals are being laid out for congress then they aren't actually secret are they?
Ulaven_Demorte
Non-Prophet Organization
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2006
- Posts
- 30,016
So your entire story is speculative bullshit, as usual.
This is my not surprised face.
This is my not surprised face.
Similar threads
