Sister humiliation

[LindsayRae]

It is a scary thought. It's like in the Incest is Best thread...others said "why u here if u no like incest" I made a comment that I "cannot get into" the whole mommy/son thing since my son is only twelve and I'm not a pedophile. I can't wrap my mind around fake role play of that sort even.

 

[lovecraft68]

It is a scary thought. It's like in the Incest is Best thread...others said "why u here if u no like incest" I made a comment that I "cannot get into" the whole mommy/son thing since my son is only twelve and I'm not a pedophile. I can't wrap my mind around fake role play of that sort even.

I believe to each their own, but yes a lot of what is on that thread is disturbing.

I think honestly, there is a lot of chain yanking and most of it is bs, but damn do they eat it up.

Thing is there is two types of incest. There is the fun sexy 18+ stuff we write and read here at Lit and then the reality.

In reality most parent child incest is molestation. It does not happen between an 18 year old son and his hot cougar mother, nor does it happen between a 19 year old girl eager to plese her lonely 40 year old dad. It is usually done when the child is still a child and a total abuse of trust and love.

I have written a couple of mother/son stories, but to see how they do, I have no actual kink for it.

I am in your boat with daddy/daughter as I have two and could never attempt to even think about writing it.

Personally my kink is sibling. to me even if that happened below 18 it is usually consensual and personally I get into the romantic taboo of it (loving who you shouldn't) as much as the sex.

again though if the brother is 30 and sis is young it bothers me. Guess I'm a little bit of a paradox on the matter.

 

[DocCIS]

Anyway personally I have no desire to write underage. There have been a coupel of times in my long SWB series when I used a little word plat to get the reader to understand some of the things that happened to the sister were before 18, but nothing blatant.

If you want to write or read about 14 year olds you have issues.

Sometimes things are unintentional. I wrote a scene where I had the sister wearing a night shirt with scooby doo on it. I'm just thinking she's the cutesy type and would wear that.

Just before I submitted it my wife is like, "You know you made her sound 14 right? Why not give her pigtails too?" so I changed it. Honestly it never occurred to me. It should have, but didn;t. I guess since I'm not obsessed with it, I don;t focus on every little thing.

I agree. I'm not into the whole pedophile thing, but sometimes a 17-year-old can be more mature than an 18-year-old, yet we are prevented from mentioning their age or changing it to 18. My first Annie story actually started out with the two boys being 16, but to abide by Lit's rules, they were changed to 18...but that made talking about high-school much more difficult to the point where I had to change the story completely to abide by the age limitation.

And the comment about all cheerleaders being 18 on the varsity high school team holds merit!

The problem is where to draw the line, and ultimately, Laurel and co. have drawn it at 18, so we abide by it. There are times it is constraining, but at least it's a hard-and-fast rule with less ways to circumvent it.

And I totally see where Lindsay is coming from...I don't get into incest stories. I look at my 12-year-old daughter and thinking about all the incest stories here makes me want to gag. Hell, I'll feel the same way when she turns 18...because she's MY DAUGHTER for Christ's sake...

Again. That doesn't make the rule any less stupid.

It would be different if they didn't build an ENORMOUS back door into it. You defeat the purpose of saying "ladies can't have sex with dogs" if you're going to toss in that Warg only exists in Lord of the Rings and thus doesn't count. Same for horse, what's the point in saying "no horses, but Unicorns aren't horses, and neither a Pegasi. You see those wings and that horn? That makes them magical and all your problems go away. Their problem isn't with being inteligent enough to consent (which would be a not stupid rule) their problem isn't with it being animal, not really or they wouldn't advertise the backdoor. It's like saying thou shall not steal. . .without your Batman costume. Either stealing is bad and wrong or it isn't. Dressing up as Batman shouldn't allow you to break the law. Like I said stupid. And I do follow it. I write the story and then go google up mythical monsters.

It also raises all sorts of other problems. Is Scooby a dog? How bout Brian Griffin? Both are capable of speech and other things dogs can't do, and in both of their cartoons these are special cases (Scooby doesn't even know he's a dog and is always confused when someone gets mad at him for beign where dogs don't belong.) and even "in verse" are clearly something other than dogs. A rule (that isn't stupid) should be clear and concise. The age rule is clear and concise. Noone under 18. The fact that you can dance around it nonwithstanding.

The only time the age rule gets confusing is with that pesky charachter/actor issue and I don't think I've ever seen anybody test that particular rule as it's too complicated and as long as you were quiet the mods probably wouldn't know the difference.

Agree wholeheartedly with you here. The Bestiality rule has too many back-doors. If they don't want bestiality, it should be against ALL creatures, mythical or real. If you're going to allow people having sex with unicorns and wargs, then horses and dogs should not be immediately dismissed.

I'm almost tempted to write a hardcore bestiality story and substitute 'little pink butterflies with magical properties shooting fairy dust out their asses" in place of the animals just to see if it would pass..."and she was mounted from behind by the little pink butterfly with magical properties shooting fairy dust out of its ass" LOL!

Sadly ASSTR and some other sites are loaded with that age and younger. More frightening is that many of the stories are rape stories including gang rapes.

I really think anyone who reads or writes that should be registered as a sex offender because it is a matter of time.

Again agreed about the whole underaged thing...and although at times there is some constraint with the "only 18" rule, it's at least a solid rule and the line has been dranw.

One of the reasons I rarely visit ASSTR any longer is due to the open underaged and rape thing, instead preferring to devote my time and submissionts on this site. To each there own, and although there are people who like that sort of shit, I personally don't and worry about their states of mind.

Same holds true with the more hardcore BDSM stories with gold showers and scat scenarios. Not into it, never will be as I don't find it interesting (although I am writing a story with a golden shower scene at this moment just to see if I can). But ASSTR is wide open to the most crudest drivel around...at least this site has some moderation.

I, like Sean, just don't agree with the hypocrisy of some of the rules and the ways people can easily get around it (particularly bestiality). I'm not necessarily into that sort of thing, but the large back-doors to circumvent those rules make them completely useless...


===== /off soapbox ====


Now, back to the original topic...

I love the premise of the hot sister wanting to get her brothers in trouble and having it backfire on her. Maybe she arranged the entire thing and the father/uncle/brother found out and played along until she strung up her own noose. In the end they decide since she acted like a little girl she will be punished as one and spank her.

She finds she likes it and gets turned on.

They in turn see a hot girl squirming under their laps getting turned on, and things move on from there.



My twist (and personal back-door) for this would be she is adopted, so they are not truly blood-relatives, so let the sex begin freely without invading my boundaries!


...see what I did thar?

 

[Sean Renaud]

The reason I stay off of ASSTR is say what you want about crap stories getting on Lit there is some amount of quality control here. They get some garbage that is unreadable.

One the original topic the age issue is really the problem here. In what world are children the youngest of which is eighteen getting spanked. I know we can suspend reality but that's not a suspension of it, that's simply shattering it to the point where you need to explain why this guy in blue with his underwear on the outside can fly and why people take this other guy dressed up as a bat with boomerangs seriously. I mean we are in a REALLY weird place here and you'd need back story that would bore people.

 

[Tmmldr]

It is a scary thought. It's like in the Incest is Best thread...others said "why u here if u no like incest" I made a comment that I "cannot get into" the whole mommy/son thing since my son is only twelve and I'm not a pedophile. I can't wrap my mind around fake role play of that sort even.

I agree. (But I did try to talk my really hot 7th grade math teacher into doing it with me. She wouldn't...)

 

[LindsayRae]

I agree. (But I did try to talk my really hot 7th grade math teacher into doing it with me. She wouldn't...)

You mean after you were an adult and came back to the school for a visit, or...?