Sig-line test.

Laurel,

you've forgot to put an editor's choice mark. You stupitit cat woman.
 
Did I mention on one of your other posts just how irritating you are?

I didn't?

Silly me.
 
ChilledVodka said:
Do not reply.

dont take this the wrong way or anything but you dont need to post a new thread to see your new sig line, just look at one of your old threads/posts, the new sig line will show up there :)
 
Re: Re: Sig-line test.

Asendin said:


dont take this the wrong way or anything but you dont need to post a new thread to see your new sig line, just look at one of your old threads/posts, the new sig line will show up there :)
I think he knew that already...yet even still the link is not a link yet
 
Re: Re: Sig-line test.

Asendin said:


dont take this the wrong way or anything but you dont need to post a new thread to see your new sig line, just look at one of your old threads/posts, the new sig line will show up there :)
Not necessarily true.

I've checked my old posts, and there wasn't a sig-line showing. That is why I posted this test. Do you think I'm that thick?
 
Re: Re: Re: Sig-line test.

JerseyBoy said:

I think he knew that already...yet even still the link is not a link yet
Cut 'n paste, you lazyboy.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sig-line test.

ChilledVodka said:

Cut 'n paste, you lazyboy.
what do you think, I'm at work or something?

put a {url} before the link and a {/url) after it. but use '[' instead of '{'
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sig-line test.

JerseyBoy said:

what do you think, I'm at work or something?

put a {url} before the link and a {/url) after it. but use '[' instead of '{'
It still doesn't work, yo.
 
sorry...you probably need to use this 'URL=http://' in the initial URL and dont forget your ending ']' its missing

and take out the http:// in your part
 
Back
Top