GreyFlannel
Corner Table
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2011
- Posts
- 564
As a shareholder, I'm more interested in my investment portfolio than I am about the Russian-Ukranian problem.
My vote: They should stay.
My vote: They should stay.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a question of morality vis a vis profit. No need to feel alone. These ten companies helped Hitler, one of them is Coca-Cola:As a shareholder, I'm more interested in my investment portfolio than I am about the Russian-Ukranian problem.
My vote: They should stay.
'Calls grow to boycott Coca-Cola, McDonald’s and PepsiCo as major firms stay in Russia.'
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/calls-grow-boycott-coca-cola-182445654.html
It's an old issue. Back in the Apartheid days, college students were always demanding the university divest from any South African investments in its portfolio.That's a personal choice and the OP says he'd made the choice. Seems no particular reason to post this thread.
And as I just pointed out Coca-Cola supported Hitler.It's an old issue. Back in the Apartheid days, college students were always demanding the university divest from any South African investments in its portfolio.
Older than that -- during the Revolution, Patriots boycotted British manufactures.
The word is named after Captain Charles Boycott, agent of an absentee landlord in Ireland, against whom the tactic was successfully employed after a suggestion by Irish nationalist leader Charles Stewart Parnell and his Irish Land League in 1880.
Looks like McDonald's is going to close 850 of its stores in Russia, temporarily.As a shareholder, I'm more interested in my investment portfolio than I am about the Russian-Ukranian problem.
My vote: They should stay.
'Calls grow to boycott Coca-Cola, McDonald’s and PepsiCo as major firms stay in Russia.'
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/calls-grow-boycott-coca-cola-182445654.html
And during the American Civil War, cotton workers in Manchester refused to work on cotton picked by slaves even though that meant the British workers starved.It's an old issue. Back in the Apartheid days, college students were always demanding the university divest from any South African investments in its portfolio.
Older than that -- during the Revolution, Patriots boycotted British manufactures.
As a shareholder, I'm more interested in my investment portfolio
Couldn't they get cotton from Egypt and India?And during the American Civil War, cotton workers in Manchester refused to work on cotton picked by slaves even though that meant the British workers starved.
At the time the US was the worlds' largest producer of cotton. India was not happy to supply Manchester because the mills were undercutting Indian cotton fabric production.Couldn't they get cotton from Egypt and India?
I have read that the American Civil War had the unintended consequence of providing a lot of stimulus to the Egyptian and Indian economies.At the time the US was the worlds' largest producer of cotton. India was not happy to supply Manchester because the mills were undercutting Indian cotton fabric production.
It did as cotton fabric manufacturers struggled to get cotton that wasn't supplied by the Southern US, but the two countries could not make up what had come from America.I have read that the American Civil War had the unintended consequence of providing a lot of stimulus to the Egyptian and Indian economies.
Well, you can't reasonably expect an investment advisor to anticipate revolutions.My maternal ancestors were told to invest in Russian stocks in 1900. They lost all their money in 1917.
That's what they get for not using slave labor.It did as cotton fabric manufacturers struggled to get cotton that wasn't supplied by the Southern US, but the two countries could not make up what had come from America.
He should have advised diversification. Of course he sold out of Russian stocks before 1914.Well, you can't reasonably expect an investment advisor to anticipate revolutions.
Anyone who had stocks in 1914 would have been well advised to sell everything and put it all into war industries.He should have advised diversification. Of course he sold out of Russian stocks before 1914.
In America. They made fantastic profits in WW1.Anyone who had stocks in 1914 would have been well advised to sell everything and put it all into war industries.