Should Chris Matthews be shot for warning about socialist executions?

if Chris were honest or would have kept his eyes open he would have seen Bernie coming years ago like we did.
 
And then who do we go after?

PROPERTY OWNERS!!!!!

COmmmieShaw and Lincoln have no problem with a little progress....gotta get rid of the 4 olds!!! Before they can have a great leap forward in progress!!!
 
Not trying to take those socialists out of the race :D

Apparently so.

The dems are so incompetent and corrupt they can't run a primary in a fly-over state. And once more it's obvious to all that they will cheat and change the rules on the fly even with their own slate of candidates. The "ends justify the means" still seems the be the parties motto.

The democrats claim they aren't socialist/communist but whenever they achieve power they begin to put in place regulations that essentially attempt to micro-manage all things private, by that property or business. That is essentially the Chinese Communist model under Ji. They count on us being too fucking stupid to see what's happening.
 
I hate to say it, but there are a lot of really stupid people out there.






:eek:

Of course. The democrat party wants to be the deliverance of vengeance for all "victims" for all crimes, real or imagined. And that always ends up the same way every time it's tried.
 
Apparently so.

The dems are so incompetent and corrupt they can't run a primary in a fly-over state. And once more it's obvious to all that they will cheat and change the rules on the fly even with their own slate of candidates. The "ends justify the means" still seems the be the parties motto.

The democrats claim they aren't socialist/communist but whenever they achieve power they begin to put in place regulations that essentially attempt to micro-manage all things private, by that property or business. That is essentially the Chinese Communist model under Ji. They count on us being too fucking stupid to see what's happening.

That's pretty generic socialism....control all things private because it doesn't recognize privacy. Everything is the states and the states bidnizz.

IMO the Chinese flavor comes from Mao.

This is where "progress" comes in.....look at what progressives want to do, what they consider "progress".

Getting rid of old culture, customs, habits, ideas and replacing it all with the state/collective pursuit of equity is "progress".

Getting rid of old culture, customs, habits and ideas is a major part of what distinguishes Moaism from other spins on socialism....and why most modern 'progressivism' in the west has a large if not dominant share of it's roots in Maoism.

The primary characteristic where they differ is Maos extreme isolationism/nationalism vs. progressives globalism and the weird desire to see an end of nation states/self governance in favor of global authority.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top