LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
http://lil-purrfect-femme.tumblr.com/post/86934517648/shootings-can-be-good-for-feminists
It sure can be, if your movement is based upon the same mindset as America's War on Terror culture.
But while modern feminism is little more than McCarthyism repackaged, its insanity offers men's rights activists and egalitarians an important lesson. It's not enough to know that shootings are barbaric, it's necessary to know that they're counterproductive and, most importantly, it's necessary to know what is the best way to destroy feminist extremism.
The worst fate for a radfem is not death. It is to suffer and live through the collapse of their ideology under the weight of its own lies, arrogance and hypocrisy. To see their constituents (women) turn against them while fed up men realize that they don’t need to consider themselves the expendable gender any longer. The beauty of watching feminists careen into a frenzy of mass panics at the ongoing rise of women protesting and denouncing (radicalized) feminism is but a taste of the right and proper end that should befall all who believe in that bigoted nonsense.
A ruined, despirited radical feminist who lives out her life with rejection and misery, is a glorious and beautifully intricate work of art and righteous karma, woven into a warning message for all future generations. A violently killed feminist, moreso than any other example of ideological violent aggression* (the exception being self-defense**), is the result of the world’s animalistic cruelty, and its moral and ideological failure. The man who kills a feminist is an uncivilized feral beast (as is a woman who kills a man for non self-defense reasons). It tells future generations that radical feminism is a victim, not a villain: it perpetuates the feminist myth of men as the Great Oppressor. In a greatly sanitized understatement: counterproductive. Every Marc Lepine style shooting is first a dead innocent woman who most likely did nobody any wrong, and then a great leap forward for the radical feminist male-bashing propaganda machine, which is then a giant step back for men's freedom.
If a feminist must ever die - this not being an optimal situation - she must die by her own hands with absolutely no man having any direct or indirect part in it whatsoever.
A man’s involvement in the destruction of radical feminism must be 100,000% nonviolent.
* This is due to Western society's public perception. A murdered man makes heads shake but many will ask if he brought it upon himself. A murdered woman is a national emergency and a feminist war cry.
** Even in the case of self-defense against a feminist bent on murder, it is better to, if possible, imprison her with other women… whom she won’t, let us say, always find to be her allies.
It sure can be, if your movement is based upon the same mindset as America's War on Terror culture.
But while modern feminism is little more than McCarthyism repackaged, its insanity offers men's rights activists and egalitarians an important lesson. It's not enough to know that shootings are barbaric, it's necessary to know that they're counterproductive and, most importantly, it's necessary to know what is the best way to destroy feminist extremism.
The worst fate for a radfem is not death. It is to suffer and live through the collapse of their ideology under the weight of its own lies, arrogance and hypocrisy. To see their constituents (women) turn against them while fed up men realize that they don’t need to consider themselves the expendable gender any longer. The beauty of watching feminists careen into a frenzy of mass panics at the ongoing rise of women protesting and denouncing (radicalized) feminism is but a taste of the right and proper end that should befall all who believe in that bigoted nonsense.
A ruined, despirited radical feminist who lives out her life with rejection and misery, is a glorious and beautifully intricate work of art and righteous karma, woven into a warning message for all future generations. A violently killed feminist, moreso than any other example of ideological violent aggression* (the exception being self-defense**), is the result of the world’s animalistic cruelty, and its moral and ideological failure. The man who kills a feminist is an uncivilized feral beast (as is a woman who kills a man for non self-defense reasons). It tells future generations that radical feminism is a victim, not a villain: it perpetuates the feminist myth of men as the Great Oppressor. In a greatly sanitized understatement: counterproductive. Every Marc Lepine style shooting is first a dead innocent woman who most likely did nobody any wrong, and then a great leap forward for the radical feminist male-bashing propaganda machine, which is then a giant step back for men's freedom.
If a feminist must ever die - this not being an optimal situation - she must die by her own hands with absolutely no man having any direct or indirect part in it whatsoever.
A man’s involvement in the destruction of radical feminism must be 100,000% nonviolent.
* This is due to Western society's public perception. A murdered man makes heads shake but many will ask if he brought it upon himself. A murdered woman is a national emergency and a feminist war cry.
** Even in the case of self-defense against a feminist bent on murder, it is better to, if possible, imprison her with other women… whom she won’t, let us say, always find to be her allies.
