Sexually cool or Sexually super uncool

[Catsandtats]

Delete

Please delete post

 

[lovetoread]

dude, thats just wrong

the people simply doing their job deserve to be able to give their consent

 

[rae121452]

uncool. now, if you had invited them in for a gangbang, that would have been totally cool.

 

[Pairaclities]

Hey, you never know.
The outside workers may have been turned on and their sex that evening may have been exceptional.

 

[ToPleaseHim]

So, I have been into an exhibition kick lately, and my partner isn't. Which means most of the ideas I have around that are out, respectful boo.

I was hanging around in my house with no pants on, when a team of workers came to fix something on the outside of the house (we aren't in charge of that, didn't know they were coming, etc.). I started freaking out a bit trying to figure out how to get to part of my home that had pants in it without being seen.

Partner decided it's a totally cool time to push me against the wall (in a very tiny out of sight area) and fuck my absolute brains out. Which, he was doing all my favorite things to get me louder, and when you get deep in enough your brain stops working and I stopped trying to be so quiet... So there is zero chance they didn't hear me.

Now though, I have some uncertainty. They didn't ask to be part of our game, but we were inside our own house. I don't really want to make people uncomfortable, but I'm in my own home? I'm not going to turn down really good sex? But I still feel unsure.

So, fucking inside your house but innocent workers hear you getting railed: (vote in poll above)

100% not okay to involve people in your kink without their consent. Ridiculous.

When I first saw this thread on the GB, I felt sorry for you for the responses you’re likely to get. But, yeah, you deserve them.