Beatnic_jazzman
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2010
- Posts
- 142
Here's a quote from a reply to an article in HuffPo;
Recomended for any who are interested.
Wow--so much to say and only 250 words to say it: vampire fiction as you mention actually goes back hundreds of years and while it would appear to be going through a renaissanc*e, the last big one wasn't that long ago (Buffy, Anne Rice). Not to get too Freudian, but vampirism is penetratio*n and therefore is sexual (but not strictly heterosexu*al). Meyer's fiction is vampirism lite and was written for the tween set (and hitchhiked on the Potter phenomenon*) and therefore must contain the requisite repression*. And for the biggest piece? I theorized in the late 90s that the then seeming popularity of supernatur*al romance was in response to the changing roles of women and feminist criticisms of the bodice-rip*pers of the 70s and early 80s. That is (and this is over-simpl*fying), in the bodice-rip*pers, the beautiful but weak woman is swept off her feet by the overbearin*g and yet dashing, swashbuckl*ing cad. Womens' roles were changing and as they became more confident and powerful, so too did the heroines. But in order for them to be swept off their feet, the heroes had to become that much more powerful--*and thus the resurgance of the supernatur*al hero. Women were equal in brains and power and sexuality-*-but still not quite as powerful as the vampire, the werewolf, the time traveler, etc. And even though it's been over 10 years since I studied the phenomenon (academica*lly), the thesis still holds. Would that I had published.
Recomended for any who are interested.