Senate GOP Nudges Trump: Don’t Nominate Herman Cain For The Fed

bbx56

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jan 29, 2019
Posts
5,258
Really?

if the guy were white

his qualifications would be lauded

#SAD
 
Sorry BB, I agree with the rest of them.

he was among other things

what do "YOU" see that makes you agree with the RACISTS?

Cain grew up in Georgia and graduated from Morehouse College in 1967 with a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics. Cain pursued graduate studies at Purdue University and graduated with a Master of Science in Computer Science in 1971, while also working full-time for the U.S. Department of the Navy. In 1977, he joined the Pillsbury Company in Minneapolis where he later became vice president. During the 1980s, his success as a business executive at Burger King prompted Pillsbury to appoint him as chairman and CEO of Godfather's Pizza, in which capacity he served from 1986 to 1996.

Cain was chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch from 1989 to 1991. He was deputy chairman, from 1992 to 1994, and then chairman until 1996, of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. In 1994, Cain publicly opposed the Health Security Act, resulting in him being appointed to the Kemp Commission in 1995. In 1996, he served as a senior economic adviser to Bob Dole's presidential campaign. Cain became the CEO of the National Restaurant Association, in which he served as president and CEO from 1996 to 1999. Additionally, he has served as a member of the board of directors of several companies.
 
what do "YOU" see that makes you agree with the RACISTS?

For one thing, I'm not agreeing with the "racists" I'm agreeing that Cain isn't the best pick.

Yes, he has experience and has managed public money supplies in the past. That's why I didn't say he wasn't qualified.

Right now, Trump is being seen as someone who picks cronies who can or have done favors for him. He doesn't need Cain and he certainly doesn't need any of the "improper' appearance that nominating Cain would bring. Not that there would be anything "improper" but the narrative would be that there is.

Trump needs to find someone who is low key, low profile, and totally qualified. Cain isn't that person.
 
For one thing, I'm not agreeing with the "racists" I'm agreeing that Cain isn't the best pick.

Yes, he has experience and has managed public money supplies in the past. That's why I didn't say he wasn't qualified.

Right now, Trump is being seen as someone who picks cronies who can or have done favors for him. He doesn't need Cain and he certainly doesn't need any of the "improper' appearance that nominating Cain would bring. Not that there would be anything "improper" but the narrative would be that there is.

Trump needs to find someone who is low key, low profile, and totally qualified. Cain isn't that person.

whoever he picks

the NARRATIVE would be the same

TRUMP=HITLER

every Pres has a right to PICK who he wants!

the NIGGERS is Sen have a right to say NO

Its RACISM!
 
It doesn't matter who Trump picks.


Quit skirting the issue.
This has nothing to do with Cain, one way or another and everything to do with the Trump issue(s).

If he nominated Jesus Christ, he would be nominating a violent angry man who attacks hapless bankers in an attempt to pander to the Evangelical Right.


:rolleyes:


Cain is far more qualified for a job like this than Van Jones was for any official office...

This is just another example of Progressive racism; Cain's not down for the struggle and the Progressives cannot claim to being the secret of his success as they could with President Obama and his picks like Jones and Holder.
 
Look who NIGGER had as Sec advisor

a FAILED NOVELIST!


Not only is this TDS, its RACIST as well
 
It doesn't matter who Trump picks.


Quit skirting the issue.
This has nothing to do with Cain, one way or another and everything to do with the Trump issue(s).

If he nominated Jesus Christ, he would be nominating a violent angry man who attacks hapless bankers in an attempt to pander to the Evangelical Right.


:rolleyes:


Cain is far more qualified for a job like this than Van Jones was for any official office...

This is just another example of Progressive racism; Cain's not down for the struggle and the Progressives cannot claim to being the secret of his success as they could with President Obama and his picks like Jones and Holder.

Which is why I suggested that Trump nominate someone who is low key but eminently qualified. I don't know who that could be, but that person is out there. I'm sure of it.
 
Which is why I suggested that Trump nominate someone who is low key but eminently qualified. I don't know who that could be, but that person is out there. I'm sure of it.

Cain IS qualified and what does LOW key have to do with anything

If Trump would nominate a deaf mute, they would be against him/her
 
Cain IS qualified and what does LOW key have to do with anything

If Trump would nominate a deaf mute, they would be against him/her

At this time, Chairman of the Fed should not be, IMO, something which could be easily politicized. The D's will do it, but let's at least make them work for it.

Cain is a public persona. He speaks regularly on Fox yet rarely on other networks. That alone is enough for some to say he's partisan and will act accordingly to the detriment of half the country.

Why hand that talking point to the D's? And it's not just "handing" it to them. It's plastering it on every telephone pole, billboard, tree and building in America as a way the Left can crucify both Trump and Cain at the same time. Even if unsuccessful in denying Cain the position, the outrage that the Left can manufacture over this going into an election year could sway low information voters toward progressive policies and candidates.
 
At this time, Chairman of the Fed should not be, IMO, something which could be easily politicized. The D's will do it, but let's at least make them work for it.

Cain is a public persona. He speaks regularly on Fox yet rarely on other networks. That alone is enough for some to say he's partisan and will act accordingly to the detriment of half the country.

Why hand that talking point to the D's? And it's not just "handing" it to them. It's plastering it on every telephone pole, billboard, tree and building in America as a way the Left can crucify both Trump and Cain at the same time. Even if unsuccessful in denying Cain the position, the outrage that the Left can manufacture over this going into an election year could sway low information voters toward progressive policies and candidates.

Fuckem

They are sayin the same about Moore



They are now saying that about Barr

They would say that about ANYONE
 
Fuckem

They are sayin the same about Moore



They are now saying that about Barr

They would say that about ANYONE


I'm not denying it. What I'm saying is that we shouldn't be GIVING it to them.
 
you miss the point

ANYONE he picks will be given same treatment

why is Cain so toxic..other then he is BLACK and a REPOH and not on the PLANTATION?
 
you miss the point

ANYONE he picks will be given same treatment

why is Cain so toxic..other then he is BLACK and a REPOH and not on the PLANTATION?

I already told you - he's too high profile.
 
Back
Top