Huckleman2000
It was something I ate.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2004
- Posts
- 4,400
The Supremes channeled Boxlicker in their reasoning to eliminate corporate spending limits in Citizens United vs FEC (pdf).
Here's a summary of the case and arguments.
And here is the always-insightful Dahlia Lithwick:
Here's a summary of the case and arguments.
And here is the always-insightful Dahlia Lithwick:
But you can plainly see the weariness in Stevens eyes and hear it in his voice today as he is forced to contend with a legal fiction that has come to life today, a sort of constitutional Frankenstein moment when corporate speech becomes even more compelling than the "voices of the real people" who will be drowned out. Even former Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist once warned that treating corporate spending as the First Amendment equivalent of individual free speech is "to confuse metaphor with reality." Today that metaphor won a very real victory at the Supreme Court. And as a consequence some very real corporations are feeling very, very good.