Weird Harold
Opinionated Old Fart
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2000
- Posts
- 23,768
I did laundry this weekend and because the aprtment complex laundry rooms were both full, I went in search of a laundromat that could make use of my stash of quarters -- either by making change for a "Money Card" such as the apartment's laundries use or by accepting coins directly in the machine.
The closest Laundromat used the "Money Card" system, but a different money card system than the apartment complex -- that meant an additional two dollars for a compatible card to load with value to transfer to the machines.
Where the question of "Scam" comes into the picture is that neither the apartment complex nor the Laundromat "value transfer" machines will accept anything smaller than a $5 bill and no combination of washer and dryer charges add up to a multiple of five dollars; the only way you can use the card down to zero balance is to do something like thirty loads of laundry at once.
Whether intended or not, the end result is that the laundry machine company winds up holding (and likely earning interest on) the balance left on the card without giving anything of value in return or making any (obvious) provision for refunding the unused balance.
So is this a scam or the "reasonable security precaution" and "customer convenience" it's promoted as.
In the case of the apartment complex, I do believe it's largely security driven -- there have been far fewer machines trashed for the coin boxes since the went to the money card system and they provide the (first) card with $3 balance at no cost. (if you lose it, you have to pay the two dollars for a new card --with a $3 balance because you can't feed the value transfer machine with $1 bills or quarters.)
The Laundromat, I think it's a scam because there is ample 24 hours security both inside the laundromat and in the shopping center where it's located. The sytem could be designed to accept singles and coins to load the cards with the exact amount required for doing laundry. The $5 minimum guarantees the company is always dgoing to be holding value remaining on the card at least until the next laundry.
So, what's your verdict? Should such systems be required to accept exact value or is the interest earned on remainders the just due to the company for providing this safe, secure, reliable mode of feeding their washers and dryers? (don't slip on the sarcasm dripping of that last bit of description.
)
The closest Laundromat used the "Money Card" system, but a different money card system than the apartment complex -- that meant an additional two dollars for a compatible card to load with value to transfer to the machines.
Where the question of "Scam" comes into the picture is that neither the apartment complex nor the Laundromat "value transfer" machines will accept anything smaller than a $5 bill and no combination of washer and dryer charges add up to a multiple of five dollars; the only way you can use the card down to zero balance is to do something like thirty loads of laundry at once.
Whether intended or not, the end result is that the laundry machine company winds up holding (and likely earning interest on) the balance left on the card without giving anything of value in return or making any (obvious) provision for refunding the unused balance.
So is this a scam or the "reasonable security precaution" and "customer convenience" it's promoted as.
In the case of the apartment complex, I do believe it's largely security driven -- there have been far fewer machines trashed for the coin boxes since the went to the money card system and they provide the (first) card with $3 balance at no cost. (if you lose it, you have to pay the two dollars for a new card --with a $3 balance because you can't feed the value transfer machine with $1 bills or quarters.)
The Laundromat, I think it's a scam because there is ample 24 hours security both inside the laundromat and in the shopping center where it's located. The sytem could be designed to accept singles and coins to load the cards with the exact amount required for doing laundry. The $5 minimum guarantees the company is always dgoing to be holding value remaining on the card at least until the next laundry.
So, what's your verdict? Should such systems be required to accept exact value or is the interest earned on remainders the just due to the company for providing this safe, secure, reliable mode of feeding their washers and dryers? (don't slip on the sarcasm dripping of that last bit of description.
